{"id":775476,"date":"2023-12-13T11:42:58","date_gmt":"2023-12-13T16:42:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=775476"},"modified":"2023-12-13T11:42:58","modified_gmt":"2023-12-13T16:42:58","slug":"webb-identifies-tiniest-free-floating-brown-dwarf-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=775476","title":{"rendered":"Webb identifies tiniest free-floating brown dwarf"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div id=\"\">\n<header class=\"entry article__block\">\n\t<span class=\"pillar article__item\">Science &amp; Exploration<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>13\/12\/2023<\/span><br \/>\n\t\t\t\t<span><span id=\"viewcount\">483<\/span><small> views<\/small><\/span><br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span><span id=\"ezsr_total_25361489\">16<\/span><small> likes<\/small><\/span><\/p>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"abstract article__block article__item\">\n<p>\nDiscovery helps answer the question: How small can you go when forming stars?<br \/>Brown dwarfs are sometimes called failed stars, since they form like stars through gravitational collapse, but never gain enough mass to ignite nuclear fusion. The smallest brown dwarfs can overlap in mass with giant planets. In a quest to find the smallest brown dwarf, astronomers using the NASA\/ESA\/CSA James Webb Space Telescope have found the new record-holder: an object weighing just three to four times the mass of Jupiter.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"article__block\">\n<p>Brown dwarfs are objects that straddle the dividing line between stars and planets. They form like stars, growing dense enough to collapse under their own gravity, but they never become dense and hot enough to begin fusing hydrogen and turn into a star. At the low end of the scale, some brown dwarfs are comparable with giant planets, weighing just a few times the mass of Jupiter.<\/p>\n<p>Astronomers are trying to determine the smallest object that can form in a star-like manner. An international team using the NASA\/ESA\/CSA James Webb Space Telescope has identified the new record-holder: a tiny, free-floating brown dwarf with only three to four times the mass of Jupiter.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cOne basic question you\u2019ll find in every astronomy textbook is, what are the smallest stars? That\u2019s what we\u2019re trying to answer,\u201d explained lead author Kevin Luhman of Pennsylvania State University.<\/p>\n<p>To locate this newfound brown dwarf, Luhman and his colleague, Catarina Alves de Oliveira, chose to study the star cluster IC 348, located about 1000 light-years away in the Perseus star-forming region. This cluster is young, only about five million years old. As a result, any brown dwarfs would still be relatively bright in infrared light, glowing from the heat of their formation.<\/p>\n<p>The team first imaged the centre of the cluster using Webb\u2019s NIRCam (Near-Infrared Camera) to identify brown dwarf candidates from their brightness and colours. They followed up on the most promising targets using Webb\u2019s NIRSpec (Near-Infrared Spectrograph) microshutter array.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"article__block\">\n<figure class=\"article__image article__image--left\"><figcaption class=\"image__caption\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tStar Cluster IC 348 (NIRCam image annotated)<br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Webb\u2019s infrared sensitivity was crucial, allowing the team to detect fainter objects than ground-based telescopes. In addition, Webb\u2019s sharp vision enabled them to determine which red objects were pinpoint brown dwarfs and which were blobby background galaxies.<\/p>\n<p>This winnowing process led to three intriguing targets weighing three to eight Jupiter masses, with surface temperatures ranging from 830 to 1500 degrees Celsius. The smallest of these weighs just three to four times Jupiter, according to computer models.<\/p>\n<p>Explaining how such a small brown dwarf could form is theoretically challenging. A heavy and dense cloud of gas has plenty of gravity to collapse and form a star. However, because of its weaker gravity, it should be more difficult for a small cloud to collapse to form a brown dwarf, and that is especially true for brown dwarfs with the masses of giant planets.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt\u2019s pretty easy for current models to make giant planets in a disc around a star,\u201d said Catarina Alves de Oliveira of ESA, principal investigator on the observing program. \u201cBut in this cluster, it would be unlikely that this object formed in a disc, instead forming like a star, and three Jupiter masses is 300 times smaller than our Sun. So we have to ask, how does the star formation process operate at such very, very small masses?\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In addition to providing clues about the star formation process, tiny brown dwarfs also can help astronomers better understand exoplanets. The least massive brown dwarfs overlap with the largest exoplanets; therefore, they would be expected to have some similar properties. However, a free-floating brown dwarf is easier to study than a giant exoplanet since the latter is hidden within the glare of its host star.<\/p>\n<p>Two of the brown dwarfs identified in this survey show the spectral signature of an unidentified hydrocarbon, a molecule containing both hydrogen and carbon atoms. The same infrared signature was detected by NASA\u2019s Cassini mission in the atmospheres of Saturn and its moon Titan. It has also been seen in the interstellar medium, the gas between stars.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is the first time we\u2019ve detected this molecule in the atmosphere of an object outside our Solar System,\u201d explained Catarina. \u201cModels for brown dwarf atmospheres don\u2019t predict its existence. We\u2019re looking at objects with younger ages and lower masses than we ever have before, and we\u2019re seeing something new and unexpected.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Since the objects are well within the mass range of giant planets, it raises the question of whether they are indeed brown dwarfs, or in fact rogue planets that were ejected from planetary systems. While the team can\u2019t rule out the latter, they argue that they are far more likely to be brown dwarfs than an ejected planets.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"article__block\">\n<figure class=\"article__image article__image--right\"><figcaption class=\"image__caption\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tStar Cluster IC 348 (NIRCam compass image)<br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>An ejected giant planet is unlikely for two reasons. First, such planets are uncommon in general compared to planets with smaller masses. Second, most stars are low-mass stars, and giant planets are especially rare among those stars. As a result, it\u2019s unlikely that most of the stars in IC 348 (which are low-mass stars) are capable of producing such massive planets. In addition, since the cluster is only five million years old, there probably hasn\u2019t been enough time for giant planets to form and then be ejected from their systems.<\/p>\n<p>The discovery of more such objects will help clarify their status. Theories suggest that rogue planets are more likely to be found in the outskirts of a star cluster, so expanding the search area may identify them if they exist within IC 348.<\/p>\n<p>Future work may also include longer surveys that can detect fainter, smaller objects. The short survey conducted by the team was expected to detect objects as small as twice the mass of Jupiter. Longer surveys could easily reach one Jupiter mass.<\/p>\n<p>These observations were taken as part of Guaranteed Time Observation program #1229. The results were published in the\u00a0<i>Astronomical Journal<\/i>.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\n<b>More information<\/b><br \/>Webb\u00a0is the largest, most powerful telescope ever launched into space. Under an international collaboration agreement, ESA provided the telescope\u2019s launch service, using the Ariane 5 launch vehicle. Working with partners, ESA was responsible for the development and qualification of Ariane 5 adaptations for the Webb mission and for the procurement of the launch service by Arianespace. ESA also provided the workhorse spectrograph\u00a0NIRSpec\u00a0and 50% of the mid-infrared instrument\u00a0MIRI, which was designed and built by a consortium of nationally funded European Institutes (The MIRI European Consortium) in partnership with JPL and the University of Arizona.<\/p>\n<p>Webb is an international partnership between NASA, ESA and the Canadian Space Agency (CSA).<\/p>\n<p>Release on esawebb.org<\/p>\n<p>\n<b>Contact:<\/b><br \/>ESA Media relations<br \/>media@esa.int<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"share button-group article__block article__item\">\n<p><button id=\"ezsr_25361489_4_5\" class=\"btn ezsr-star-rating-enabled\" title=\"Like\">Like<\/button><\/p>\n<p id=\"ezsr_just_rated_25361489\" class=\"ezsr-just-rated hide\">Thank you for liking<\/p>\n<p id=\"ezsr_has_rated_25361489\" class=\"ezsr-has-rated hide\">You have already liked this page, you can only like it once!<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.esa.int\/Science_Exploration\/Space_Science\/Webb\/Webb_identifies_tiniest_free-floating_brown_dwarf?rand=771654\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Science &amp; Exploration 13\/12\/2023 483 views 16 likes Discovery helps answer the question: How small can you go when forming stars?Brown dwarfs are sometimes called failed stars, since they form&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":775468,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-775476","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ESA"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/775476","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=775476"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/775476\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/775468"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=775476"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=775476"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=775476"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}