{"id":775783,"date":"2023-12-18T17:08:53","date_gmt":"2023-12-18T22:08:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=775783"},"modified":"2023-12-18T17:08:53","modified_gmt":"2023-12-18T22:08:53","slug":"astronomers-scan-hundreds-of-stars-for-anomalous-transits","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=775783","title":{"rendered":"Astronomers Scan Hundreds of Stars for &#8220;Anomalous Transits&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>Telescopes have been collecting copious amounts of data on exoplanets in recent years. One of the most common datasets tracks what are known as \u201ctransits,\u201d where an exoplanet crosses in front of its host star and dims the star\u2019s light slightly as it does so. The majority of exoplanets have been found this way, but other interesting details might be hidden in the data. For example, what would it mean if the transits happened in a way that disagreed with typical Newtonian physics? One answer to that question is that there might be an intelligent force behind the discrepancy \u2013 and that\u2019s what a group of researchers at Breakthrough Listen began looking for in a paper recently published on arXiv.<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-164883\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Technically, the researchers weren\u2019t looking simply at transits but at a data set called a \u201clightcurve.\u201d These graphs track an object\u2019s brightness over time \u2013 transits usually are identified by a noticeable dip in a star\u2019s lightcurve.<\/p>\n<p>But how a star\u2019s lightcurve is affected by a planet could vary in several ways. For example, the path might vary somewhat across the star\u2019s surface or at a slower speed on a second pass. Anomalies like that keep astronomers awake all night \u2013 to do their job, of course.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<p>\n<span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Breakthrough Listen Candidate 1: Alien Technology or not?\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/E_Bhg5on5us?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/span>\n<\/p><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Breakthrough Listen has had several promising leads so far, but nothing definitive as of yet.<br \/>Credit \u2013 SETI Institute YouTube Channel<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>In their downtime, though, they might be dreaming about aliens. A technologically advanced civilization could modify its planet\u2019s lightcurve through gigantic thrusters or a similar colossal engineering project. In fact, the planet itself might be such an engineering project, such as a Birch world or other megalithic structure.<\/p>\n<p>The way to track that down would be to try to determine if there were any such anomalous lightcurves that other physical phenomena couldn\u2019t explain. Unfortunately, after a preliminary search of the lightcurve data from Kepler, the answer seems to be \u201cno.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s not to say there weren\u2019t any anomalous signatures at all. There were, in fact, 228 exoplanetary systems that had an \u201canomalous\u201d signal. However, ten of those systems couldn\u2019t nicely fit into the software model the researchers decided to know (known, interestingly, as \u201cBatman\u201d), leaving them with 218 candidate systems to check manually.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<p>\n<span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Jason Wright | An Overview of Technosignatures | 21 \/ 22  | Life in the Universe 2021\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/TcNCBZTEzQc?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/span>\n<\/p><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Jason Wright, a professor at Penn State and technical member of Breakthrough Listen, describes different types of technosignatures that could be found.<br \/>Credit \u2013 BerkeleySETI YouTube Channel<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>To make that daunting task more accessible, the researchers broke the anomalous signals into three different categories \u2013 transits that appeared to be \u201cmissing,\u201d transits that were deeper than expected, and transits that had significant \u201ctransit timing variations\u201d (TTV) \u2013 i.e., the planet was either going faster or slower than it was when it was initially seen.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0Breaking down the details of these 218 anomalous systems takes up the bulk of the paper. Still, the outcome of all that research is there aren\u2019t any transits that look to be clearly created by something that could be considered technological \u2013 what modern-day astronomers have come to call a \u201ctechnosignature.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>This is still early days, though. So far, we\u2019ve found 5000+ exoplanets out of the billions that probably exist. Statistics is not really on our side for this one, and as such more data is needed. Sifting through that data using techniques like the one developed in this paper will be a focal point of astrobiologists and others interested in SETI for the next few decades. They certainly won\u2019t lack for data to scroll through, as more and more planety hunting telescopes continually come online.<\/p>\n<p>Learn More:<br \/>Zuckerman et al. \u2013 The Breakthrough Listen Search for Intelligent Life: Detection and Characterization of Anomalous Transits in Kepler Lightcurves<br \/>UT \u2013 Breakthrough Listen Scans Entire Galaxies for Signals From Extremely Advanced Civilizations<br \/>UT \u2013 Astronomers are Searching for a Galaxy-Wide Transmitter Beacon at the Center of the Milky Way<br \/>UT \u2013 Astronomers Scan the Skies for Nanosecond Pulses of Light From Interstellar Civilizations<\/p>\n<p>Lead Image:<br \/>Artist\u2019s impression of an anomalous transit. Credit: DALL-E<\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-164883-6580c0f66df93\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=164883&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-164883-6580c0f66df93\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-164883-6580c0f66df93\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/164883\/astronomers-scan-hundreds-of-stars-for-anomalous-transits\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Telescopes have been collecting copious amounts of data on exoplanets in recent years. One of the most common datasets tracks what are known as \u201ctransits,\u201d where an exoplanet crosses in&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":775784,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-775783","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/775783","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=775783"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/775783\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/775784"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=775783"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=775783"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=775783"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}