{"id":776007,"date":"2023-12-21T14:16:52","date_gmt":"2023-12-21T19:16:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=776007"},"modified":"2023-12-21T14:16:52","modified_gmt":"2023-12-21T19:16:52","slug":"finally-a-productive-use-for-nuclear-weapons-asteroid-defence","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=776007","title":{"rendered":"Finally. A Productive Use for Nuclear Weapons: Asteroid Defence"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>While it has been a favorite disaster movie theme, nuking an incoming asteroid in the real world has been touted as a very bad idea. While a nuclear bomb could possibly obliterate a smaller asteroid, nuking a larger asteroid would only break it into pieces. Those pieces would still threaten our planet, and perhaps even makes things worse by producing multiple impacts across the planet. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>But is using nuclear weapons on an incoming asteroid really a bad idea? If the right technique is used, a nuclear blast could possibly be used as an asteroid deflection device. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-164932\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Researchers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) have now created a modeling tool that can simulate what might happen if a nuclear device is detonated above the surface of an asteroid. \u00a0The tool is helping to improve the understanding of how the radiation from a nuclear blast interacts with an asteroid\u2019s surface, and also looks at the shockwave dynamics that might affect the inner asteroid. \u00a0<\/p>\n<p>The explosive technique called nuclear ablation, where the blast\u2019s radiation would vaporize part of the asteroid\u2019s surface, generating an explosive thrust and a change in velocity in response.<\/p>\n<p>The model can incorporate a wide range of initial conditions which simulate the kinds of asteroids we\u2019ve recently been able to study up close, from solid rocks to rubble piles. These simulations are giving planetary scientists more insights \u2013and more options \u2013 for when a space rock might one day be bearing down on Earth.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf we have enough warning time, we could potentially launch a nuclear device, sending it millions of miles away to an asteroid that is headed toward Earth,\u201d said researcher Mary Burkey from LLNL. \u201cWe would then detonate the device and either deflect the asteroid, keeping it intact but providing a controlled push away from Earth, or we could disrupt the asteroid, breaking it up into small, fast-moving fragments that would also miss the planet.\u201d<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Image captured by the Italian Space Agency\u2019s LICIACube a few minutes after the intentional collision of NASA\u2019s Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) mission with its target asteroid, Dimorphos, captured on Sept. 26, 2022. Credits: ASI\/NASA<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Thanks to the Double Asteroid Redirection Test (DART) mission \u2013 where a kinetic impactor was deliberately crashed into an asteroid to alter its trajectory \u2014 scientists have learned much about what it would take to redirect a dangerous asteroid. This new model, called the X-ray energy deposition model, gives researchers the tools to build upon the insights gained from DART while exploring how nuclear ablation could be a viable alternative to kinetic impact missions.<\/p>\n<p>Burkey said in a LLNL press release that nuclear devices have the highest ratio of energy density per unit of mass of any human technology, which could make them an invaluable tool in mitigating asteroid threats.<\/p>\n<p>But, as the team wrote in their paper, published in The Planetary Science Journal, \u201cpredicting the effectiveness of a potential nuclear deflection or disruption mission depends on accurate multiphysics simulations of the device\u2019s X-ray energy deposition into the asteroid and the resulting material ablation.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The team said the relevant physics in these simulations require a variety of different complex physics packages, they span many orders of magnitude and are computationally very demanding. Burkey and her colleagues set the goal of developing an efficient and accurate way of modeling nuclear deflection for a range of physical properties of an asteroid.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"638\" height=\"425\" src=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/2023_MaryBurkey_AsteroidDeflection_6945_1000px.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-164934\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/2023_MaryBurkey_AsteroidDeflection_6945_1000px.jpg 638w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/2023_MaryBurkey_AsteroidDeflection_6945_1000px-580x386.jpg 580w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/12\/2023_MaryBurkey_AsteroidDeflection_6945_1000px-250x167.jpg 250w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 638px) 100vw, 638px\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Physicist Mary Burkey developed a novel approach to simulating the energy deposition from a nuclear device on an asteroid\u2019s surface. Credit: LLNL. <\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Burkey said that their high-fidelity simulations can track photons penetrating surfaces of asteroid-like materials such as rock, iron, and ice, while accounting for more complex processes, such as reradiation. The model also considers a wide variety of asteroid bodies. They said this comprehensive approach makes the model applicable to a wide range of potential asteroid scenarios.<\/p>\n<p>If a real planetary defense emergency should arise, Megan Bruck Syal, LLNL\u2019s planetary defense project lead, said this high-fidelity simulation modeling will be critical in providing decision-makers with actionable, risk-informed information that could prevent asteroid impact, protect essential infrastructure and save lives, explained<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhile the probability of a large asteroid impact during our lifetime is low, the potential consequences could be devastating,\u201d Bruck Syal said.<\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-164932-65848e09c1dc8\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=164932&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-164932-65848e09c1dc8\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-164932-65848e09c1dc8\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/164932\/finally-a-productive-use-for-nuclear-weapons-asteroid-defence\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>While it has been a favorite disaster movie theme, nuking an incoming asteroid in the real world has been touted as a very bad idea. While a nuclear bomb could&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":776008,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-776007","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/776007","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=776007"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/776007\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/776008"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=776007"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=776007"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=776007"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}