\n<\/p>\n
What do you call a galaxy without stars?<\/p>\n
Earlier this month, radio astronomers announced that they had discovered the darkest galaxy ever not quite seen, a cloud of hydrogen gas resembling our own Milky Way galaxy in many respects, such as its mass and rotation, but with no stars that anyone can discern.<\/p>\n
\u201cWhat we might have here \u2014 might <\/em>\u2014 is the discovery of a primordial galaxy, a galaxy that is so diffuse, it hasn\u2019t been able to form stars readily,\u201d Karen O\u2019Neil of the Green Bank Observatory in West Virginia told a news conference at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society in New Orleans on Jan. 8.<\/p>\n That same week, a group of Spanish astronomers led by Mireia Montes, a research fellow at the Canary Islands Institute of Astrophysics, revealed the discovery of another nearly starless galaxy they called Nube, Spanish for \u201ccloud.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cWith our present knowledge, we do not understand how a galaxy with such extreme characteristics can exist,\u201d Dr. Montes said in a statement released by the institute. Dr. Montes is the first author of the new paper, which was published in the journal Astronomy & Astrophysics.<\/p>\n And so, we can add \u201cdark galaxies\u201d to \u201cdark matter,\u201d \u201cdark energy\u201d and the other terms of darkness already in the cosmic lexicon.<\/p>\n Dark galaxies are entities whose stars are so sparse and faint that their light cannot be discerned other than as a thin, transparent haze that doesn\u2019t seem to contain any stars at all. (Early on, dark galaxies were referred to as \u201clow surface-brightness galaxies\u201d or \u201cultra-diffuse galaxies,\u201d but time and jargon march on.) As astronomers continue to probe deeper into the skies with more powerful and smarter eyes, dark galaxies have begun popping up more frequently, challenging long-held views about the formation and evolution of galaxies.<\/p>\n These dim ghosts are hard to find and even harder to study, requiring hours or days of observation to bring their visible starlight into focus. One way is to scan the heavens with radio telescopes tuned to the frequency of the interstellar hydrogen gas that pervades galaxies.<\/p>\n Dr. O\u2019Neil was part of such a study, involving a variety of telescopes, of some 350 low-surface-brightness galaxies. \u201cI mistyped the coordinates to the galaxy I intended to observe, resulting in the telescope pointing to a different part of the sky than intended,\u201d she recounted recently in an email. The telescope landed on something she had never seen before.<\/p>\n \u201cIt\u2019s a galaxy made only out of gas \u2014 it has no visible stars,\u201d she said. \u201cStars could <\/em>be there, we just can\u2019t see them.\u201d<\/p>\n The galaxy, known as J0613+52, is about 270 million light-years away. It is swimming amid two billion solar masses worth of primordial hydrogen that was produced in the Big Bang, but the galaxy is not forming any stars, probably because the gas is too diffuse to clump together into the clouds that become stars. Moreover, there are no galaxies nearby with a gravitational influence that could trigger such clumping.<\/p>\n \u201cJ0613+52 appears to be both undisturbed and underdeveloped,\u201d Dr. O\u2019Neil said. \u201cThis could be our first discovery of a nearby galaxy made up of primordial gas.\u201d<\/p>\n
\nThe accidental galaxy<\/h2>\n
\nA diminutive Nube<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n