{"id":776644,"date":"2024-02-11T11:12:49","date_gmt":"2024-02-11T16:12:49","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=776644"},"modified":"2024-02-11T11:12:49","modified_gmt":"2024-02-11T16:12:49","slug":"japan-explains-how-it-made-an-upside-down-moon-landing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=776644","title":{"rendered":"Japan Explains How It Made an Upside-Down Moon Landing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Japan became the fifth nation to land on the moon on Saturday, but its spacecraft ended up in an awkward position, with its engine nozzle pointed up toward space.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">By design, the Japanese spacecraft, known as Smart Lander for Investigating Moon, or SLIM, was supposed to land on its side, a strategy to avoid tipping over on the sloped terrain of the landing site.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">But about 150 feet above the ground, one of SLIM\u2019s two main engines appears to have failed, officials at JAXA, the Japanese space agency, said on Thursday.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">With the onboard computer trying to compensate for the sudden loss of half of the thrust, the spacecraft was still able to hit the ground at a modest vertical velocity of about 3 miles per hour. But SLIM\u2019s horizontal speed and orientation at landing were outside what it was designed to handle.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">As a result, the spacecraft rolled onto its head. It escaped the fate of some other recent robotic missions, which smashed into pieces on the moon, and its systems worked, communicating with Earth. But the solar panels ended up facing west, away from the lunar morning sun, and were unable to generate electricity. With the battery mostly drained, mission controllers on Earth sent a command to shut down the spacecraft less than three hours after landing.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Despite the stumble, the mission accomplished its primary goal: a soft landing in rugged terrain on the moon, within 100 meters of a target landing site, much more precise than the uncertainty of miles that most landers aim for.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">\u201cIt successfully achieved the controlled landing,\u201d Hitoshi Kuninaka, director general of JAXA\u2019s Institute of Space and Astronautical Science, said in Japanese at a news conference. \u201cWe confirmed that the landing position was 55 meters away from the initial target. So we concluded that we achieved the 100-meter-accuracy pinpoint landing.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">During its brief operation, an instrument on the lander took low-resolution, black-and-white images of the surrounding landscape. SLIM team members bestowed nicknames of dog breeds on rocks that caught their interest.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Two small rovers ejected from SLIM just before landing both moved around the lunar surface, and one of them snapped a photograph of the upside-down lander.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">JAXA officials remain optimistic that SLIM could revive in about one week, when, during the two-week lunar afternoon, the sun will be shining from the west, illuminating the solar panels.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">\u201cWe will try to establish communications as SLIM automatically starts operation when the power generation starts,\u201d which could allow operations to resume, said Shinichiro Sakai, the project manager for SLIM, during the news conference.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">If SLIM comes back to life, the lander\u2019s instrument will make detailed measurements of the composition of the rocks and soil.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Dr. Sakai said he had \u201cmixed feelings\u201d about the orientation that the spacecraft ended up in. \u201cIf the solar cells happened to face down on the surface, there won\u2019t be any chance to receive sunlight, so I feel so relieved it stayed as it is,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Dr. Sakai said photographs taken by SLIM during its descent, before and after its partial loss of thrust, indicate that one of the engine nozzles fell off. JAXA officials are investigating what went wrong.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2024\/01\/25\/science\/japan-moon-lander-slim.html?rand=772170\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Japan became the fifth nation to land on the moon on Saturday, but its spacecraft ended up in an awkward position, with its engine nozzle pointed up toward space. By&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":776645,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-776644","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-new-york-times-space-cosmos"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/776644","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=776644"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/776644\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/776645"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=776644"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=776644"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=776644"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}