{"id":776658,"date":"2024-02-11T11:21:01","date_gmt":"2024-02-11T16:21:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=776658"},"modified":"2024-02-11T11:21:01","modified_gmt":"2024-02-11T16:21:01","slug":"the-k7ra-solar-update-14","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=776658","title":{"rendered":"The K7RA Solar Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">02\/02\/2024<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;ASWFC GEOMAGNETIC DISTURBANCE WARNING ISSUED AT 0248 UTC\/02 FEBRUARY 2024 BY THE AUSTRALIAN SPACE WEATHER FORECASTING CENTRE.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A CME was observed from 01\/0800 UT. This CME is expected to pass<br \/>mostly above the Earth, however a glancing blow is possible either<br \/>late UT day 03-Feb or early UT day 04-Feb to cause possible G1-G2<br \/>geomagnetic storming. A coronal hole wind stream may also contribute<br \/>to enhanced geomagnetic activity.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;INCREASED GEOMAGNETIC ACTIVITY EXPECTED DUE TO CORONAL MASS EJECTION FROM 04-05 FEBRUARY 2024.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Seven new sunspot groups emerged this reporting week, but solar<br \/>activity was lower. One new spot appeared on January 26, two more on<br \/>January 28, three more on January 30 and one more on January 31.<\/p>\n<p>Then on February 1 five new sunspot groups emerged, and the daily<br \/>sunspot number rose to 113, far above the average for the previous<br \/>seven days.<\/p>\n<p>Average daily sunspot number dropped from 130.6 to 71.6, and average<br \/>daily solar flux declined from 173.3 to 145.4.<\/p>\n<p>Average planetary A index changed from 7.4 to 6.9, while middle<br \/>latitude averages shifted from 5.1 to 5.6.<\/p>\n<p>What is the outlook for the next month? Looks like a modest peak in<br \/>solar flux at 175 on February 20.<\/p>\n<p>Predicted solar flux is 135 on February 2, 140 on February 3-5, 145<br \/>on February 6-8, then a jump to 165 on February 9-11, 170 on<br \/>February 12, 165 on February 13-15, 170 on February 16-19, 175 on<br \/>February 20, then 170, 165, 160, 150, 140, 135 and 140 on February<br \/>21-27, 145 on February 28-29, and 150 on March 1-2, then 155 on<br \/>March 3-4, 160 on March 5, and 165 on March 6-9.<\/p>\n<p>Predicted planetary A index is 5 on February 2-3, then 14, 20 and 8<br \/>on February 4-6, then 5 on February 7-16, 8 on February 17-18, 5 on<br \/>February 19-24, then 10, 12 and 10 on February 25-27, and 5 on<br \/>February 28 through March 2, then 10 on March 3-4, and 5 on March 5<br \/>through the middle of the month.<\/p>\n<p>Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>Ionosphere &#8211; February 1, 2024, from OK1HH:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A week ago, it appeared that more activity would come from the<br \/>large sunspot group AR3561, but it has been quiet. Then another<br \/>larger one, AR3559, surprised us when energetic protons began to<br \/>penetrate the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere in the early hours of January 29<br \/>UTC.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Such an event is called a &#8216;radiation storm,&#8217; denoted by the letter<br \/>S, and this one was classified as S2. The letter R denotes the<br \/>effects of solar X-ray and ultraviolet radiation, which in this case<br \/>was caused by a fairly massive M6.8 class solar flare. The Dellinger<br \/>effect with a maximum at 0632 UTC affected frequencies up to 30 MHz<br \/>in the region of Western Australia and the adjacent Indian Ocean.<br \/>Protons with an energy of 100 MeV hit the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere for<br \/>almost the entire day on 29 January, and protons with lower energies<br \/>continued to hit on the following days.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Only isolated, weaker C-class flares were observed in the following<br \/>days. However, the Earth was not affected by the CME; its magnetic<br \/>field remained calm to slightly unsettled, and so shortwave<br \/>propagation conditions were generally between average to slightly<br \/>above average.\u00a0 However, the increased solar radiation caused<br \/>regular daily openings of the upper shortwave bands, including the<br \/>10-meter band.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>UC Berkeley article on Sunspots:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/48ThdlY<\/p>\n<p>Two articles on a Solar Cycle peak this year:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/48Yjcpa<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3u53ZDK<\/p>\n<p>Two articles about the Sun&#8217;s poles reversing:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/4bvvmro<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/42kfljC<\/p>\n<p><em>Times Now<\/em> article about Radio Blackout:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3HGWYfn<\/p>\n<p>Send your tips, reports, observations, questions, and comments to<br \/>k7ra@arrl.net. When reporting observations, don&#8217;t forget to tell us<br \/>which mode you were operating.<\/p>\n<p>For more information concerning shortwave radio propagation, see<br \/> and the ARRL Technical Information<br \/>Service web page at,  . For<br \/>an explanation of numbers used in this bulletin, see<br \/> .<\/p>\n<p>An archive of past propagation bulletins is at<br \/> . More good<br \/>information and tutorials on propagation are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Also, check this <em>QST <\/em>article about Solar Indices:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Rc8Njt<\/p>\n<p>Instructions for starting or ending email distribution of ARRL<br \/>bulletins are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Sunspot numbers for January 25 through 31 2024 were 101, 97, 52, 75,<br \/>48, 53, and 75, with a mean of 71.8. 10.7 cm flux was 160.5, 156.7,<br \/>148.1, 141.1, 140.3, 135, and 136.2, with a mean of 145.4. Estimated<br \/>planetary A indices were 6, 6, 5, 8, 9, 8, and 6, with a mean of<br \/>6.9. Middle latitude A index was 4, 4, 4, 5, 7, 8, and 7, with a<br \/>mean of 5.6.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-k7ra-solar-update-815?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>02\/02\/2024 &#8220;ASWFC GEOMAGNETIC DISTURBANCE WARNING ISSUED AT 0248 UTC\/02 FEBRUARY 2024 BY THE AUSTRALIAN SPACE WEATHER FORECASTING CENTRE. &#8220;A CME was observed from 01\/0800 UT. This CME is expected to&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-776658","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/776658","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=776658"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/776658\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=776658"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=776658"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=776658"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}