{"id":776763,"date":"2024-02-11T15:25:01","date_gmt":"2024-02-11T20:25:01","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=776763"},"modified":"2024-02-11T15:25:01","modified_gmt":"2024-02-11T20:25:01","slug":"the-k7ra-solar-update-15","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=776763","title":{"rendered":"The K7RA Solar Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">01\/26\/2024<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Just four new sunspot groups emerged this reporting week, January<br \/>18-24, one on each day, January 18-21.<\/p>\n<p>But it looks like we may see flares, CMEs and geomagnetic storms<br \/>over the next few days. Spaceweather.com identified sunspot<br \/>group AR3561 as &#8220;hyperactive.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Sunspot numbers and solar flux declined, and geomagnetic indicators<br \/>rose, but only slightly.<\/p>\n<p>Average daily sunspot number dropped from 167.3 to 130.6, and<br \/>average solar flux from 184.1 to 173.3.<\/p>\n<p>Average planetary A index rose from 5 to 7.4, and middle latitude<br \/>numbers from 3.9 to 5.1.<\/p>\n<p>Looking ahead, we may see a short term peak in solar flux centered<br \/>around February 11, and another about six weeks from now.<\/p>\n<p>Predicted solar flux is 160 on January 26-27, 150 on January 28 to<br \/>February 1, 170 on February 2, 175 on February 3-4, 180 on February<br \/>5-8, then 190, 190 and 195 on February 9-11, then 190 and 185 on<br \/>February 12-13, 180 on February 14-15, then 175. 170, 175, 175, 170,<br \/>175, and 170 on February 16-22, then 165, 160, 165, 160 and 165 on<br \/>February 23-27, 170 on February 28-29, and 175 on March 1-2, then<br \/>180 on March 3-6.<\/p>\n<p>Predicted planetary A index is 25, 30, 18, 10 and 8 on January<br \/>26-30, then 5 on January 31 through February 16, and 8 on February<br \/>17-18, then 5 on February 19-24, then 10, 12 and 10 on February<br \/>25-27, and 5 on February 28 through early March.<\/p>\n<p>Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>Ionosphere &#8211; January 25, 2024, from OK1HH:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;At the present stage of the 11-year solar cycle, there are five to<br \/>thirteen groups of spots (or active regions) on the Sun. In three of<br \/>them, we can observe such magnetic configuration that allows the<br \/>development of a larger flare, possibly with a CME.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;On the other hand, there are relatively few coronal holes on the<br \/>Sun, reducing the likelihood of Earth being hit by an enhanced solar<br \/>wind and then geomagnetic disturbances. Therefore, the evolution is<br \/>quieter, and the level of shortwave propagation is a little calmer<br \/>than we might otherwise expect.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Glenn Packard, K4ZOT reported from Atlanta, Georgia on January 22<br \/>that he worked New Zealand on 6 meter FT8 at 0257 UTC:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I just happened to tune to 6M tonight after being disappointed on<br \/>6M for the Winter season.\u00a0 Then Bloom, ZL4TT, comes through at R-19<br \/>and me at -08.\u00a0 Just WOW.\u00a0 Called once and he came right back to me.<br \/>Band then went dead after the contact.\u00a0 Amateur Radio still has<br \/>surprised this Olde Man.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Solar Cycle 25 nearing its peak?<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Sv70GF<\/p>\n<p>Articles about recent Solar activity:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/4b6n48Z<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3OiSL5r<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Ohoy6L<\/p>\n<p>A NOAA article about Solar Cycle Progression:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/www.swpc.noaa.gov\/products\/solar-cycle-progression<\/p>\n<p>The latest report from Dr. Tamitha Skov, WX6SWW, for January 22:<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Big Back-to-Back Storms Head To Earth | Solar Storm Forecast 22 January 2024\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/41LGqYbxsvk?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Did you know she has about 84,500 subscribers?<\/p>\n<p>New, long program from Dr. Skov for January 25:<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Incoming Solar Storms &amp; Big Flare Players | Informal Live Briefing 25 January 2024\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/wQ7VFh_D2Mw?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Send your tips, reports, observations, questions, and comments to<br \/>k7ra@arrl.net. When reporting observations, don&#8217;t forget to tell us<br \/>which mode you were operating.<\/p>\n<p>For more information concerning shortwave radio propagation, see<br \/> and the ARRL Technical Information<br \/>Service web page at,  . For<br \/>an explanation of numbers used in this bulletin, see<br \/> .<\/p>\n<p>An archive of past propagation bulletins is at<br \/> . More good<br \/>information and tutorials on propagation are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Also, check this QST article about Solar Indices:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Rc8Njt<\/p>\n<p>Instructions for starting or ending email distribution of ARRL<br \/>bulletins are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Sunspot numbers for January 18 through 24 2024 were 113, 137, 144,<br \/>150, 139, 123, and 108, with a mean of 130.6. 10.7 cm flux was<br \/>162.3, 157.4, 166.3, 178.5, 196.1, 180.3, and 172, with a mean of<br \/>173.3. Estimated planetary A indices were 6, 8, 6, 6, 9, 7, and 10,<br \/>with a mean of 7.4. Middle latitude A index was 4, 5, 4, 5, 6, 5,<br \/>and 7, with a mean of 5.1.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-k7ra-solar-update-814?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>01\/26\/2024 Just four new sunspot groups emerged this reporting week, January18-24, one on each day, January 18-21. But it looks like we may see flares, CMEs and geomagnetic stormsover the&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-776763","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/776763","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=776763"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/776763\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=776763"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=776763"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=776763"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}