{"id":776814,"date":"2024-02-11T18:27:56","date_gmt":"2024-02-11T23:27:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=776814"},"modified":"2024-02-11T18:27:56","modified_gmt":"2024-02-11T23:27:56","slug":"the-k7ra-solar-update-16","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=776814","title":{"rendered":"The K7RA Solar Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">01\/19\/2024<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Solar activity increased substantially over the past week, with<br \/>twelve new sunspot groups. One appeared on January 11, five more on<br \/>January 12, another on January 13, two more on January 15, and three<br \/>more on January 16.<\/p>\n<p>Two more sunspot groups emerged on January 18.<\/p>\n<p>Average daily sunspot number rose from 146.1 to 167.3, and solar<br \/>flux from 163.3 to 184.1.<\/p>\n<p>Geomagnetic numbers remained low and practically unchanged, with<br \/>planetary A index moving from 4.9 to 5, and middle latitude A index<br \/>shifting from 4.3 to 3.9.<\/p>\n<p>Predicted solar flux is 162, 160 and 155 on January 19-21, then 150<br \/>on January 22-23, 152 on January 24-25, 167 on January 26, 170 on<br \/>January 27-29, then 175 and 180 on January 30-31, 185 on February<br \/>1-4, then 187 and 185 on February 5-6, 170 on February 7-8, 175 on<br \/>February 9-10, 190 on February 11-12, then 185, 175, 170 and 165 on<br \/>February 13-16, then 162 on February 17-18, then 160, 160, 165 and<br \/>167 on February 19-22, and 170 on February 23-25.<\/p>\n<p>Predicted planetary A index is 5, 1, and 10 on January 19-21, then 5<br \/>on January 22-27, 8 on January 28-30, 5 on January 31 through<br \/>February 11, 8 on February 12-14, and 5 on February 15-23, then 12<br \/>on February 24-25.<\/p>\n<p>In an email report on January 14, Jon Jones, N0JK wrote, &#8220;Today<br \/>there are thirteen sunspot groups on the Earthside of the Sun &#8211; the<br \/>greatest number so far in Solar Cycle 25. Despite the surfeit of<br \/>sunspots, the Sun has been quiet all weekend. Could it be the calm<br \/>before the storm? One of the sunspots (AR3541) has a delta-class<br \/>magnetic field that poses a threat for X-class solar flares.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>Ionosphere &#8211; January 18, 2024 from OK1HH:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We&#8217;ve had two weeks of mostly quiet conditions, with relatively<br \/>high solar activity but only a few flares. And most importantly &#8211; no<br \/>CMEs hitting the Earth. In addition, 13 sunspot groups were observed<br \/>on the Sun on January 13 &#8211; the highest number in the current 11-year<br \/>cycle. Despite the glut of sunspots, the Sun remained quiet.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Shortwave conditions were therefore more influenced by changes in<br \/>solar wind parameters. The exception was on 15 January, when<br \/>shortwave propagation was affected by a sporadic-E layer, which<br \/>occurred over Europe before noon UTC and over the USA later in the<br \/>afternoon UTC.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Although solar flares were not massive, they were nevertheless<br \/>accompanied by CMEs on several occasions, but were directed away<br \/>from Earth. The biggest of these left the Sun on January 14 and was<br \/>headed toward Mercury and Venus (these planets can be seen in the<br \/>east before sunrise).<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We are now expecting solar flares of C-class at 0-2 per day, with<br \/>the rare possibility of a M-class flare. Coronal holes are mostly<br \/>small and do not occur near active regions, which also reduces the<br \/>likelihood of geomagnetic disturbances. Therefore, it appears that<br \/>the current relatively favorable trend will continue.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Bil Paul, KD6JUI in Northern California operates from a fresh water<br \/>kayak, and sent this report:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I was out in the kayak yesterday, January 11, with 10w and a small<br \/>loop. With solar flux at 180+ I expected a lot happening on 10m but<br \/>that was not the case. Was disappointed. Did get a few contacts.<br \/>Heard Chile and Argentina coming in fairly strong (I had no luck<br \/>there) and heard very faintly an Israeli station. Best distance I<br \/>contacted was Bermuda, a VP9, on CW.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Went down to 12m and had a few more contacts.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Quite a bit of QSB on both bands.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Dave, N4KZ in Kentucky reported via email:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;For the second time in the past month I have decoded DX signals on<br \/>8 meters. Several countries have authorized their amateurs to<br \/>operate on 8 meters. The FT8 frequency is 40.680 MHz. On January 14,<br \/>2024, at 1540 UTC I saw a spot for 8 meter activity on the DX Summit<br \/>website. As soon as I moved to that frequency, I decoded several DX<br \/>signals from Europe and the Caribbean. But within a few minutes<br \/>signals faded out.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;About a month ago, I saw an Irish station work an American station<br \/>who has an experimental license for 8 meters. No other activity was<br \/>heard that time. I know of at least one American on 8 meters with an<br \/>experimental license. He&#8217;s in Georgia. I&#8217;m not sure if there are<br \/>others.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I was using my 3-element 6-meter Yagi up 60 feet to listen. On the<br \/>two occasions I have decoded European stations, they had good<br \/>signals. Offhand, crossing the Atlantic on 40 MHz seems much easier<br \/>than at 50 MHz.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Tolvo, W8JTM of Liberty Lake, Washington sent this report:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The &#8216;Santa Claus Polar Path&#8217; described by Carl Luetzelschwab, K9LA<br \/>(link follows) is well and good! Not sure if it was winter F2<br \/>ionization or Aurora-E, but I had a nice SSB ragchew with OH6RM on<br \/>10 meters on 15 January when it was 11 PM Finland time (2100 UTC),<br \/>well after the MUF had dropped to not support 28 MHz.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Signals were 20 dB over S9 with no flutter the whole time, and<br \/>after I signed off, I heard him work station-after-station all over<br \/>the USA for almost two hours with his signal only dropping to S9.<br \/>It was an incredibly solid path for 10 meters from Eastern<br \/>Washington, some 4500 miles.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I also worked into Finland on 17 January on 15 meter phone, but<br \/>there was heavy slow flutter on the signals.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;As reported by Carl, these polar paths are surprisingly reliable in<br \/>Fall and Winter, and I always enjoy working into Finland where my<br \/>parents were from.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/k9la.us\/Sep14_The_Santa_Claus_Polar_Path.pdf<\/p>\n<p>From Scientific American, a story about the upcoming Solar Eclipse,<br \/>with sunspots this time:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3vESa7r<\/p>\n<p>An image of Sunspot AR3545 from Sky and Telescope magazine:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/48BmDCb<\/p>\n<p>SciTechDaily article about the Solar peak:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/4b4f60g<\/p>\n<p>An article about a gigantic solar hole:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3O5ful2<\/p>\n<p>Explanation of the Babcock Model:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Babcock_model<\/p>\n<p>From News Rebeat, the US\/Korea to monitor solar storms:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Snq5ui<\/p>\n<p>A &#8220;Travel and Leisure&#8221; article about the Northern Lights with regard<br \/>to a Solar max January to October 2024:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3RXNKQC<\/p>\n<p>Here is the latest report from Dr. Tamitha Skov, WX6SWW:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/youtu.be\/jo0Tg2W4fEE<br \/>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 <br \/>Send your tips, reports, observations, questions and comments to<br \/>k7ra@arrl.net. When reporting observations, don&#8217;t forget to tell us<br \/>which mode you were operating.<\/p>\n<p>For more information concerning shortwave radio propagation, see<br \/> and the ARRL Technical Information<br \/>Service web page at,  . For<br \/>an explanation of numbers used in this bulletin, see<br \/> .<\/p>\n<p>An archive of past propagation bulletins is at<br \/> . More good<br \/>information and tutorials on propagation are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Also, check this:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Rc8Njt<\/p>\n<p>Instructions for starting or ending email distribution of ARRL<br \/>bulletins are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Sunspot numbers for January 11 through 17 2024 were 151, 188, 191,<br \/>183, 150, 150, and 158, with a mean of 167.3. 10.7 cm flux was<br \/>192.5, 186.4, 185.4, 187.9, 182.5, 179.6, and 174.1, with a mean of<br \/>184.1. Estimated planetary A indices were 6, 4, 3, 6, 6, 6, and 4,<br \/>with a mean of 5. Middle latitude A index was 4, 4, 3, 5, 4, 4, and<br \/>3, with a mean of 3.9.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-k7ra-solar-update-813?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>01\/19\/2024 Solar activity increased substantially over the past week, withtwelve new sunspot groups. One appeared on January 11, five more onJanuary 12, another on January 13, two more on January&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-776814","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/776814","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=776814"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/776814\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=776814"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=776814"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=776814"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}