{"id":776840,"date":"2024-02-11T20:21:51","date_gmt":"2024-02-12T01:21:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=776840"},"modified":"2024-02-11T20:21:51","modified_gmt":"2024-02-12T01:21:51","slug":"nasa-delays-artemis-astronaut-moon-missions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=776840","title":{"rendered":"NASA Delays Artemis Astronaut Moon Missions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">For NASA and its astronauts, the moon is no farther away in terms of distance, but it is slipping further into the future.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Officials at the space agency announced on Tuesday that Artemis II, the first American mission to send astronauts close to the moon in more than 50 years, will not take place late this year, as had been scheduled.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">They set a target date of September 2025 for the mission, which will swing around the moon without landing there.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">The delay in Artemis II also pushes back the subsequent mission, Artemis III, which is to land two astronauts on the moon near its south pole. That will now occur no earlier than September 2026.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Artemis II will be the first mission to send astronauts to space using NASA\u2019s huge Space Launch System rocket and Orion capsule, and NASA officials want to fix potential problems that could endanger the crew.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">\u201cWe don\u2019t fly until it\u2019s ready,\u201d Bill Nelson, the NASA administrator, said during a news conference on Tuesday afternoon. \u201cSafety is paramount.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">For the mission\u2019s delay, the officials cited a slew of technical issues including concerns about electronics in the life support system that will keep the astronauts alive inside Orion, continuing analysis of wear and tear of the capsule\u2019s heat shield during an earlier uncrewed mission and repairs to the launch tower.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Unlike the Apollo missions, Artemis II will not enter orbit around the moon; the Orion capsule will swing around the moon, using lunar gravity to sling it back to Earth for a Pacific Ocean splashdown. The entire trip should take around 10 days.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">The crew will consist of three NASA astronauts \u2014 Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover and Christina Koch \u2014 and one Canadian astronaut, Jeremy Hansen.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Amit Kshatriya, the deputy associate administrator in charge of the Moon to Mars program at NASA, said the discovery of problems with the valves in the Orion capsule\u2019s life support system was the main cause for the Artemis II delay.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Valves that were destined for the Orion capsule for Artemis III failed in tests. \u201cThat gave us pause to stop and look at that circuit in a more detailed way,\u201d Mr. Kshatriya said. <\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">The valve components for Artemis II had passed tests and had been installed, but \u201cit became very clear to us that it was unacceptable to accept that hardware, and we need to replace it in order to guarantee the safety of the crew,\u201d Mr. Kshatriya said. <\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">He said NASA also discovered a potential deficiency in Orion\u2019s batteries if the spacecraft needed to separate quickly from the rocket in case of an emergency. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Even with the change of destination, the major pieces of NASA\u2019s human spaceflight plans \u2014 the S.L.S. rocket and the Orion capsule \u2014 had already been under development for years and remained unchanged.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Initially, the pace of the lunar return was languid, with astronauts not scheduled to land until at least 2028. Then in 2019, Vice President Mike Pence, who chaired the National Space Council, announced a sudden acceleration, and said that American astronauts would walk on the moon again by the end of 2024 \u201cby any means necessary.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Mr. Pence and other critics said NASA was not moving with urgency, pointing out that only eight years elapsed between President John F. Kennedy\u2019s famous announcement in 1961 of a plan to reach the moon and the landing of Apollo 11.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Mr. Pence also raised the specter of China, which had just put a robotic lander on the far side of the moon and was aiming to land astronauts on the moon by 2030.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">The moon program was given a name: Artemis, who in Greek mythology is the twin sister of Apollo.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">In 2021, NASA hired Elon Musk\u2019s company SpaceX to build the lander for Artemis III. The company is adapting the giant Starship rocket to be able to take two NASA astronauts from lunar orbit to the moon\u2019s surface.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">NASA\u2019s accelerated schedule started slipping. Artemis I, a test launch of the S.L.S. rocket that sent an uncrewed Orion capsule on a weekslong test flight around the moon, was scheduled for late 2020 but did not launch until November 2022.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Artemis I was largely successful, and NASA officials were hopeful that Artemis II could follow two years later. <\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Although NASA\u2019s budget has received large increases in recent years, it is still a much smaller slice of the federal budget than at the height of the Apollo program in the 1960s.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">In December, the Government Accountability Office said the December 2025 target for the Artemis III moon landing was unlikely, pointing to overly optimistic schedules for the development of the Starship lunar lander and the spacesuits that astronauts would need for walking on the moon.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Two test launches of Starship last year failed to reach orbit, although SpaceX said both provided bounties of data to make improvements. The accountability office said that if Starship took as long as the average major project at NASA, it would not be ready until 2027.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">The delay allows more time for SpaceX to tackle the challenges of developing Starship, including a full-scale uncrewed lunar landing of the vehicle, now scheduled for 2025.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">James Free, NASA\u2019s associate administrator, said that the revised Artemis schedule was not overly optimistic, although he admitted that additional delays could still occur.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">\u201cWe\u2019ve tried to address the unknown unknowns and set a realistic plan in place,\u201d Mr. Free said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Other parts of NASA\u2019s moon program have also not gone as planned.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">On Monday, Peregrine, a commercial robotic lunar lander carrying five NASA experiments, was successfully sent on a trajectory toward the moon after a launch, but then its propulsion system suffered a crippling failure soon afterward. While that is a setback for NASA lunar studies, it is unlikely to add to the Artemis delays.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">In <a rel=\"nofollow noopener\" class=\"css-yywogo\" href=\"https:\/\/twitter.com\/astrobotic\/status\/1744770456626893215\" title=\"\" target=\"_blank\">its latest update<\/a> on Tuesday afternoon, Astrobotic Technology of Pittsburgh, which built the spacecraft, said it might run out of propellant for its maneuvering thrusters within about 40 hours.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">\u201cGiven the propellant leak, there is, unfortunately, no chance of a soft landing on the moon,\u201d the company said. The engineers are continuing to look for ways to extend the spacecraft\u2019s lifetime and gather data that could help future missions. <\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">NASA already has additional experiments booked on other commercial landers, part of an effort to conduct scientific research on the moon at a lower cost. NASA officials have said they expect some of these commercial missions to fail.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">However, NASA might also be leery about proceeding with Astrobotic\u2019s second mission, to take a $433.5 million rover called VIPER to the south polar region where it would explore for water ice and other resources. That flight would use a larger lander named Griffin.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">The rover is by far the most complex and expensive payload NASA has planned for the commercial lunar missions.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<p><script async src=\"https:\/\/platform.twitter.com\/widgets.js\" charset=\"utf-8\"><\/script><br \/>\n<br \/><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2024\/01\/09\/science\/nasa-moon-artemis-spacex-delay.html?rand=772170\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For NASA and its astronauts, the moon is no farther away in terms of distance, but it is slipping further into the future. Officials at the space agency announced on&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":776841,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-776840","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-new-york-times-space-cosmos"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/776840","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=776840"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/776840\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/776841"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=776840"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=776840"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=776840"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}