{"id":777336,"date":"2024-02-15T23:19:33","date_gmt":"2024-02-16T04:19:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=777336"},"modified":"2024-02-15T23:19:33","modified_gmt":"2024-02-16T04:19:33","slug":"passing-stars-changed-the-orbits-of-planets-in-the-solar-system","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=777336","title":{"rendered":"Passing Stars Changed the Orbits of Planets in the Solar System"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>The orbit of Earth around the Sun is always changing. It doesn\u2019t change significantly from year to year, but over time the gravitational tugs of the Moon and other planets cause Earth\u2019s orbit to vary. This migration affects Earth\u2019s climate. For example, the gradual shift of Earth\u2019s orbit and the changing tilt of Earth\u2019s axis leads to the Milankovitch climate cycles. So if you want to understand paleoclimate or the shift of Earth\u2019s climate across geologic time, it helps to know what Earth\u2019s orbit was in the distant past.<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-165727\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Fortunately, Newtonian mechanics and the law of gravity work backward in time as well as forward. We can use Newtonian dynamics to predict eclipses and the trajectories of spacecraft to the outer solar system, but we can also use it to turn back the clock and map Earth\u2019s orbit into the deep past. Within limits.<\/p>\n<p>Since there is no exact solution for the orbital motion of more than two bodies, we have to run our calculations computationally. A bit of chaos comes into the works, so any uncertainty we have in the current positions and motions of large solar system bodies decreases the accuracy of our retrodiction the further back in time we go. Fortunately with radar ranging and other measurements, our computations are so accurate we can trace Earth\u2019s orbit back 100 million years into the past with some confidence. Or so we thought because a new paper demonstrates we\u2019ve been overlooking the gravitational effect of passing stars.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">The uncertainty of Earth\u2019s orbit 54 million years ago. Credit: N. Kaib\/PSI<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Most stars are too distant to have any measurable effect on Earth\u2019s orbit. They tug upon our world no more than the distant rocks of the Oort Cloud. But now and then a star will make a close approach. Not close enough to throw our solar system into chaos, but close enough to give the solar planets a gravitational nudge. The most recent close approach was HD 7977. Right now the star is about 250 light-years away, but 2.8 million years ago it passed within 30,000 AU or half a light-year of the Sun. It may have passed as close as 4,000 AU from the Sun. At the larger distance, the gravitational effect of HD 7977 would be negligible, but at the closer end of the range, it would be significant. When you add this into the computational mix, the uncertainties of Earth\u2019s past orbit make it difficult to be confident more than 50 million years. And that has a significant impact on paleoclimate studies.<\/p>\n<p>For example, about 56 million years ago Earth entered a period known as the Paleocene-Eocene Thermal Maximum, where global temperatures rose 5 \u2013 8 \u00b0C. Orbital models point to the fact that Earth\u2019s orbit was particularly eccentric during that time, which could be the underlying cause. But this new study raises the uncertainty of that conclusion, meaning that other factors such as geologic activity may have played a major role.<\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s estimated that a star passes within 10,000 AU of the Sun every 20 million years or so. This means that as we map Earth\u2019s orbital motion deeper into the past, we must also look for effects that may be written in the stars.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Reference:<\/strong> Kaib, Nathan A. and Raymond, Sean N. \u201cPassing Stars as an Important Driver of Paleoclimate and the Solar System\u2019s Orbital Evolution.\u201d <em>Astrophysical Journal Letters<\/em> 962 (2024): L28.<\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-165727-65cee0e46b3eb\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=165727&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-165727-65cee0e46b3eb\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-165727-65cee0e46b3eb\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/165727\/passing-stars-changed-the-orbits-of-planets-in-the-solar-system\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The orbit of Earth around the Sun is always changing. It doesn\u2019t change significantly from year to year, but over time the gravitational tugs of the Moon and other planets&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":777337,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-777336","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/777336","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=777336"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/777336\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/777337"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=777336"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=777336"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=777336"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}