{"id":777397,"date":"2024-02-16T16:36:51","date_gmt":"2024-02-16T21:36:51","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=777397"},"modified":"2024-02-16T16:36:51","modified_gmt":"2024-02-16T21:36:51","slug":"nasa-is-done-setting-fires-inside-its-doomed-cargo-spacecraft","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=777397","title":{"rendered":"NASA is Done Setting Fires Inside its Doomed Cargo Spacecraft"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>Fire on a spacecraft can be catastrophic. It can spread quickly in a confined space, and for trapped astronauts, there may be no escape. It\u2019s fading in time now, but Apollo 1, which was to be the first crewed Apollo mission, never got off the ground because of a fire that killed the crew. There\u2019ve been other dangerous spacecraft fires too, like the one onboard the Russian Mir space station in 1997. <\/p>\n<p>In an effort to understand how fire behaves in spacecraft, NASA began its Saffire (Spacecraft Fire Safety Experiment) in 2016. Saffire was an eight-year, six-mission effort to study how fire behaves in space. The final Saffire test was completed on January 9th.<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-165747\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Fire behaviour in buildings here on Earth is well-studied and well-understood. Fire prevention and suppression are important components in building design. It makes sense to bring that same level of understanding to space travel and even to surpass it.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHow big a fire does it take for things to get bad for a crew?\u201d asked Dr. David Urban, Saffire principal investigator at NASA\u2019s Glenn Research Centre. \u201cThis kind of work is done for every other inhabited structure here on Earth \u2013 buildings, planes, trains, automobiles, mines, submarines, ships \u2013 but we hadn\u2019t done this research for spacecraft until Saffire.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>NASA has conducted six experiments under Saffire, and each one was conducted in an uncrewed Cygnus cargo vehicle after it completed its supply mission to the ISS. The vehicles are sent into the atmosphere to burn up, and the experiments are run prior to the vehicle\u2019s destruction. Saffire 1 ran in 2016 inside an avionics bay with an airflow duct. The bay contained a cotton and fibreglass burn blend, which was ignited remotely with a hot wire. <\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<p>\n<span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"NASA Glenn Saffire experiment | Watch how it will be conducted in space.\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/0JkQ12JluJ0?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/figure>\n<p>Subsequent Saffire experiments tested how different materials burned, including the fire-resistant fabric Nomex and even acrylic spacecraft windows. Tests also included varied oxygen flows, different atmospheric pressures, and different oxygen levels. Each Saffire test generated important data on how fire behaves inside spacecraft. <\/p>\n<p>The final segment of the Saffire program, Saffire-VI, was conducted on January 9th, 2024, prior to the uncrewed Northrop Grumman Cygnus spacecraft carrying the experiment burning up during re-entry. Saffire-VI was different than its predecessors in the program because the experiment had higher oxygen content and lower pressure similar to actual conditions in spacecraft. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe Saffire flow unit is a wind tunnel,\u201d said Dr. Gary Ruff, Saffire project manager at NASA\u2019s Glenn Research Center. \u201cWe\u2019re pushing air through it. Once test conditions are set, we run an electrical current through a thin wire, and the materials ignite.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Fire in a confined environment does more than just damage things and burn people. It also generates harmful combustion by-products. Alongside the predictable carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide, a fire onboard a spacecraft can generate trace amounts of hydrogen fluoride, hydrogen chloride, and hydrogen cyanide. Hydrogen fluoride is a very toxic chemical, and exposure requires immediate medical attention. Hydrogen chloride is an irritant that can become fatal, and hydrogen cyanide can damage the brain, heart, and lungs and can also be fatal. A piece of equipment called the Combustion Product Monitor (CPM) instrument uses laser spectroscopy to analyze the contents of the smoke and detect these hazardous chemicals. <\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">The Combustion Product Monitor uses laser spectroscopy to detect hazardous chemicals created by fire. Image Credit: NASA\/JPL\/Microdevices Laboratory.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Cameras inside the experiment record what happens, while other instruments outside collect data. After the experiments collect their data, it\u2019s downloaded before the Cygnus vehicle is sent plummeting toward its atmospheric destruction. By altering variables like oxygen content and flow and atmospheric pressure, the experiments gather data that the researchers use to build a predictive model of fire behaviour aboard a spacecraft. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou\u2019ve got a heat release rate and a rate of release of combustion products,\u201d Ruff said. \u201cYou can take those as model input and predict what will happen in a vehicle.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>At this point in time, humans are poised for a big leap. We\u2019re working towards establishing a presence on the Moon. From there, future crewed missions to Mars beckon. Researchers are studying how to protect astronauts\u2019 health during those flights by understanding how their bodies respond to extended time in microgravity, exposure to radiation, and other hazards. Preventing fires and extinguishing them quickly are critical issues in spaceflight and astronaut safety, especially when astronauts are so far away there\u2019s no chance of any assistance. <\/p>\n<p>The models built on Saffire data will help missions succeed and help everyone get home safely. <\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-165747-65cfd384e929d\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=165747&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-165747-65cfd384e929d\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-165747-65cfd384e929d\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/165747\/nasa-is-done-setting-fires-inside-its-soomed-cargo-spacecraft\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Fire on a spacecraft can be catastrophic. It can spread quickly in a confined space, and for trapped astronauts, there may be no escape. It\u2019s fading in time now, but&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":777398,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-777397","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/777397","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=777397"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/777397\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/777398"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=777397"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=777397"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=777397"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}