\n<\/p>\n
American intelligence agencies have told their closest European allies that if Russia is going to launch a nuclear weapon into orbit, it will probably do so this year \u2014 but that it might instead launch a harmless \u201cdummy\u201d warhead into orbit to leave the West guessing about its capabilities.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
The assessment came as American intelligence officials conducted a series of rushed, classified briefings for their NATO and Asian allies, as details of the American assessment of Russia\u2019s intentions began to leak out.<\/p>\n
The American intelligence agencies are sharply divided in their opinion about what President Vladimir V. Putin is planning, and on Tuesday Mr. Putin rejected the accusation that he intended to place a nuclear weapon in orbit and his defense minister said the intelligence warning was manufactured in an effort to get Congress to authorize more aid for Ukraine.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
During a meeting with the defense minister, Sergei K. Shoigu, Mr. Putin said Russia had always been \u201ccategorically against\u201d placing nuclear weapons in space, and had respected the 1967 Outer Space Treaty, which prohibits weaponizing space, including the placement of nuclear weapons in orbit.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe not only call for the observance of the existing agreements that we have in this area,\u201d he was quoted as saying by the Russian state media, \u201cbut we have proposed many times to strengthen these joint efforts.\u201d<\/p>\n
On Wednesday, Mr. Putin reinforced the central role he believes Russia\u2019s nuclear arsenal plays in the country\u2019s defenses: Visiting an aviation factory, he climbed into the bomb bay of a Tu-160M strategic bomber, the most modern in the Russian fleet.<\/p>\n
Mr. Putin has made no secret of his interest in upgrading Russia\u2019s Cold War-era delivery systems, like the bomber, which can reach the United States and is designed to carry two dozen nuclear weapons. And he has advertised a fleet of new weapons \u2014 some still in development \u2014 including the unmanned Poseidon nuclear torpedo, which was designed to cross the Pacific, with no human control, to explode on the West Coast of the United States. (Russia has been less transparent about the accidents that have accompanied the testing of these new weapons.)<\/p>\n
But a space weapon would be different. Unlike the rest of the Russian or American arsenals, it would not be designed to hit cities or military sites, or any place on Earth. Instead, it would be nested inside a satellite, capable of destroying swarms of commercial and military satellites circulating alongside it in low-earth orbit, including those like Starlink that are remaking global communications capabilities. It was Ukraine\u2019s ability to connect its government, its military and its leadership over Starlink that played a critical role in the country\u2019s survival in the first months after the Russian invasion, two years ago this week.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
According to two senior officials briefed on the intelligence assessment that the United States provided to allies, American officials have said that Mr. Putin may believe that the mere threat of massive disruption \u2014 even if it meant blowing up Russia\u2019s own satellites \u2014 might infuse his nuclear arsenal with a new kind of deterrent. Bloomberg reported earlier that the allies were told that a launch could come this year.<\/p>\n
If the Tu-160 bomber that Mr. Putin clambered aboard on Wednesday ever dropped its bombs on the United States or a NATO nation, the retaliation would most likely be swift. But Mr. Putin, the American analysts have told their counterparts, may believe that the old Cold War doctrine of \u201cmutually assured destruction\u201d would not apply in space: No one would risk a war over blowing up satellites, especially if there were no human casualties.<\/p>\n
But American officials admit they have low confidence in their own analysis of whether Mr. Putin is really prepared to launch a nuclear weapon into orbit. They have concluded that Russia tested such a system in early 2022, about the time that Mr. Putin ordered the invasion of Ukraine. But it took some time for American intelligence agencies to determine that test was a practice run for putting a nuclear weapon into orbit.<\/p>\n
Now those agencies are divided in their assessment of what may come next. Some believe Mr. Putin might launch a \u201cdummy\u201d weapon, but leave it unclear whether it was fake or real \u2014 making a response all the more difficult.<\/p>\n
But the concern in Washington is high enough that Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken warned his Chinese and Indian counterparts last weekend that if a nuclear weapon were ever detonated in low-earth orbit, it would take out their satellites, too. He urged them to use their influence with Mr. Putin to prevent the weapon from ever being deployed.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Mr. Shoigu, the defense chief, said on Tuesday that Russia was not violating the 1967 treaty, but he stopped short of talking about plans. \u201cWe do not have any nuclear weapons deployed in space, or elements of nuclear weapons being used on satellites, or fields created to stop satellites working effectively,\u201d he said, according to Russian media reports.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe don\u2019t have any of that, and they know that we don\u2019t, but they are still making noise,\u201d he continued, at the meeting with Mr. Putin. \u201cThe reason why the West is making this noise consists of two things: first, to scare senators and congressmen, to extract funding supposedly not just for Ukraine, but also to counter Russia and to subject it to strategic defeat.\u201d<\/p>\n
\u201cAnd second, in our view they would like to push us so clumsily into restarting a dialogue on strategic stability,\u201d he said, a reference to talks that were briefly underway before the invasion of Ukraine about devising a successor to the New START treaty, which limits the number of overall weapons that the U.S. and Russia can deploy. The treaty expires in two years.<\/p>\n
Those discussions also delved into new kinds of weapons and new technologies, including artificial intelligence, that could pose new nuclear threats. But the talks ended with the invasion of Ukraine, and have never resumed.<\/p>\n
Audio produced by Adrienne Hurst.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n