{"id":777719,"date":"2024-02-23T00:05:56","date_gmt":"2024-02-23T05:05:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=777719"},"modified":"2024-02-23T00:05:56","modified_gmt":"2024-02-23T05:05:56","slug":"anti-satellite-weapons-will-threaten-everyones-access-to-space","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=777719","title":{"rendered":"Anti-Satellite Weapons Will Threaten Everyone&#8217;s Access to Space"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>It\u2019s a headline straight out of the movies yet the White House has recently confirmed it believes that Russia is building space-based anti-satellite weapon! There seems to be no conclusive evidence what this might be but one option may be a nuclear bomb that would indiscriminately wipe out satellites within a huge volume of space! Not only would it devastate satellites but would cause more problems down on the surface and create a whole load of space junk.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-165836\"\/><\/p>\n<p>In a statement, the National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby said that he did not believe the weapon had an \u2018active capability\u2019 yet and further went on to say he did not believe it had even been deployed. He went on to say that the White House was monitoring Russian activity and would continue to take it very seriously.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Launching such a nuclear weapon into space would violate the 1967 Outer Space Treaty which countries of the United Nations, including Russia, signed. It prohibits putting nuclear weapons or weapons of mass destruction into space, on the Moon or on any other celestial object. Such an act would likely prompt sanctions from other nations and further compound the situation faced by Russia following its invasion of Ukraine. Note that such a device wouldn\u2019t even actually need to be used, just deploying it into space would be sufficient to violate the Treaty.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>A spokesperson from Moscow has denied the existence of such a program suggesting it was \u201cmalicious fabrication\u201d that has been created by the American political teams. The Kremlin went on to suggest that such a fabrication might coerce the Congress to pass a $97 billion foreign aid bill which includes $60 million for Ukraine.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Tempting though such a nuclear device might seem to any countries wishing to unleash devastation to other nations, the impacts can be far reaching. The destruction of any object in orbit will create a whole debris field with components ranging from a few millimetres to several centimetres. At the moment, there are several hundreds of millions of pieces of space debris being tracked from Earth. The high velocity items drifting around pose a threat to other satellites still in operation and even the International Space Station which has had to apply course directions to avoid collisions.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Should Russia have, and launch and subsequently detonate a nuclear device in space, they would not only be putting themselves at risk of more sanctions but also be putting their own satellites at risk! It\u2019s almost impossible to control the path of space debris so a detonation would generate more that would undoubtedly destroy some of Russia\u2019s own satellites.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>It may be some time before we know for certain whether Russia are planning a nuclear capability in space. The one hope is that they recognise the risk to their own, and other supportive countries space assets. Taking out a bunch of US or western satellites is one thing but the subsequent debris taking out their own infrastructures and those of other supportive nations may have repercussions that are quite unpalatable.\u00a0 Even if the space debris does not knock out other satellites, it is certainly going to make it even harder for us to travel beyond the confines of the Earth due to the sheer volume of high velocity fragments orbiting the planet.<\/p>\n<p>Source : Russia\u2019s space weapon: anti-satellite systems are indiscriminate, posing a risk to everyone\u2019s spacecraft<\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-165836-65d827b524c5a\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=165836&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-165836-65d827b524c5a\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-165836-65d827b524c5a\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/165836\/anti-satellite-weapons-will-threaten-everyones-access-to-space\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It\u2019s a headline straight out of the movies yet the White House has recently confirmed it believes that Russia is building space-based anti-satellite weapon! There seems to be no conclusive&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":777720,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-777719","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/777719","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=777719"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/777719\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/777720"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=777719"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=777719"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=777719"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}