{"id":777803,"date":"2024-02-25T13:46:50","date_gmt":"2024-02-25T18:46:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=777803"},"modified":"2024-02-25T13:46:50","modified_gmt":"2024-02-25T18:46:50","slug":"can-humans-endure-the-psychological-torment-of-mars","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=777803","title":{"rendered":"Can Humans Endure the Psychological Torment of Mars?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">What about the mission\u2019s psychological aspect? The monotony? The loneliness?<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">\u201cI\u2019m a hardware person first,\u201d McCauley said. She is, to be precise, a solid-propulsion systems engineer. She has the distinction of being the member of our species who has been most responsible for determining the best method to catapult humanity to Mars. In order to do so, she had to know how much weight a spaceship will carry. McCauley could estimate, down to the milligram, the mass of every nut and bolt, every antivortex baffle and cargo-bay door. But how many corn tortillas and yogurt packets will four astronauts, under psychological duress, consume in 378 days? That question, or some version of it, was what McCauley needed answered. She also needed to know how much clothing they\u2019ll need. Clothes are heavy.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\"><strong class=\"css-8qgvsz ebyp5n10\">Mathias, the isolation<\/strong> historian, was not surprised to learn that the psychological questions were a secondary consideration for NASA. But his skepticism about CHAPEA went further. Mathias questioned whether any experimental rationale could justify yet another isolation study. \u201cI wonder if the scientific value of these simulation experiments is beside the point,\u201d he said. The experiments, instead, seemed to him \u201ca way of willing the colonization of Mars into being. A form of wish fulfillment \u2014 or cosplaying, to put it less poetically. This is about satisfying an urge. There seems to be a compulsion to keep repeating these fake Mars missions until we actually do it. There\u2019s something very beautiful about this idea, but also very macabre at the same time.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">The analogue experiments reflect the utopian promise of our Martian future. For a human mission to Mars is not the highest ambition of the space program. It is just the beginning, a small step for mankind before the giant leap of planetary colonization.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Five months before CHAPEA\u2019s call for applications, Dennis Bushnell, then chief scientist at NASA Langley Research Center and a nearly 60-year veteran of NASA, published \u201cFutures of Deep Space Exploration, Commercialization and Colonization: The Frontiers of the Responsibly Imaginable.\u201d Martian colonization has always been imaginable, particularly to this nation of colonizers. But in his paper Bushnell noted that the prospect has in recent years \u201cmoved from extremely difficult to increasingly feasible.\u201d Colonization has also become increasingly desirable, because of \u201cpossibly existential societal issues, including climate change, the crashing ecosystem, machines taking the jobs, etc.\u201d \u2014 the et cetera perhaps reflective of the obviousness of planetary decline.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">A more surprising aspect of the paper is Bushnell\u2019s prediction for how the physical hostility of Mars will be overcome: Colonists will \u201cmorph into an altered species.\u201d He cites projections that suggest that \u201ctravelers that colonize Mars will, over time, due to the reduced g and radiation exposure, evolve into Martians.\u201d The ultimate promise of NASA\u2019s Mars mission is the chance to begin again \u2014 if not, exactly, as human beings, then as Martians.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2024\/02\/25\/magazine\/mars-isolation-experiment.html?rand=772170\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>What about the mission\u2019s psychological aspect? The monotony? The loneliness? \u201cI\u2019m a hardware person first,\u201d McCauley said. She is, to be precise, a solid-propulsion systems engineer. She has the distinction&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":777804,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-777803","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-new-york-times-space-cosmos"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/777803","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=777803"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/777803\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/777804"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=777803"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=777803"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=777803"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}