{"id":778788,"date":"2024-03-13T03:18:51","date_gmt":"2024-03-13T08:18:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=778788"},"modified":"2024-03-13T03:18:51","modified_gmt":"2024-03-13T08:18:51","slug":"sleeping-black-hole-is-way-more-massive-than-it-should-be","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=778788","title":{"rendered":"Sleeping black hole is way more massive than it should be"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div id=\"\">\n<figure class=\"article-image-inline ArticleImage\" data-method=\"caption-shortcode\">\n<div class=\"ArticleImage__Wrapper\"><\/div><figcaption class=\"ArticleImageCaption\">\n<div class=\"ArticleImageCaption__CaptionWrapper\">\n<p class=\"ArticleImageCaption__Title\">Black holes can go \u201cdormant\u201d if they aren\u2019t actively feeding<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleImageCaption__Credit\">Jurik Peter\/Shutterstock<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p>\n<p>A black hole in the early universe has almost half the mass of its host galaxy despite no longer sucking in matter, raising questions about how black holes grow.<\/p>\n<p>While Ignas Juod\u017ebalis at the University of Cambridge and his colleagues were looking through data from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), they found something unusual. It was a faint galaxy, seen from our perspective as it was about 800 million years after the big bang, with a central black\u2026<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.newscientist.com\/article\/2421742-sleeping-black-hole-is-way-more-massive-than-it-should-be\/?utm_campaign=RSS%7CNSNS&#038;utm_source=NSNS&#038;utm_medium=RSS&#038;utm_content=space&#038;rand=772163\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Black holes can go \u201cdormant\u201d if they aren\u2019t actively feeding Jurik Peter\/Shutterstock A black hole in the early universe has almost half the mass of its host galaxy despite no&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":778789,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-778788","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-new-scientist"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/778788","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=778788"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/778788\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/778789"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=778788"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=778788"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=778788"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}