{"id":779397,"date":"2024-03-22T10:07:52","date_gmt":"2024-03-22T15:07:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=779397"},"modified":"2024-03-22T10:07:52","modified_gmt":"2024-03-22T15:07:52","slug":"the-k7ra-solar-update-22","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=779397","title":{"rendered":"The K7RA Solar Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">03\/22\/2024<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Over March 14-20, new sunspot groups emerged every day except March<br \/>19. March 18 had two, and each of the other days saw one new sunspot<br \/>group.<\/p>\n<p>It is now Spring in the Northern Hemisphere which is favorable to HF<br \/>conditions, and solar and geomagnetic numbers both show improvement.<\/p>\n<p>Average daily sunspot numbers rose from 82.3 to 94.3, and average<br \/>daily solar flux jumped from 130.4 to 153.3.<\/p>\n<p>Geomagnetic indicators were very quiet, with the average daily<br \/>planetary A index dropping from 8.9 to 5.9, and middle latitude<br \/>numbers from 7 to 5.<\/p>\n<p>Here is the outlook for the next month.<\/p>\n<p>Predicted solar flux is 180 and 178 on March 22-23, 174 on March<br \/>24-25, then 176 on March 26-27, 178 on March 28, 165 on March 29-30,<br \/>160 on March 31, 155 on April 1-3, then 158 on April 4, 160 on April<br \/>5-6, then 162, 155, 150, and 145 on April 7-10, 148 on April 11-12,<br \/>then 152, 155, 160, 162, 165 and 160 on April 13-18, then 155 on<br \/>April 19-20, 152 on April 21, 160 on April 22-23, then 162, 165, 165<br \/>and 160 on April 24-27, and 155 on April 28-30.<\/p>\n<p>Predicted planetary A index is 12, 5, 16, 18 and 8 on March 22-26,<br \/>then 5, 5 and 8 on March 27-29, 5 on March 30 through April 2, then<br \/>15, 12 and 12 on April 3-5, 5 on April 6-8, 8 on April 9-11, then 5<br \/>on April 12-23, 10 on April 24-25, and 5 on April 26-29.<\/p>\n<p>Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>Ionosphere &#8211; March 21, 2024, from F.K. Janda, OK1HH:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Solar activity on average continues to increase toward the Solar<br \/>Cycle 25 maximum. This included a shower of protons that came from<br \/>the admittedly smaller in X-ray intensity but primarily long-lived<br \/>flare on the morning hours UTC of March 15. The particle density<br \/>peaked a day later when the proton event reached S1. High polar cap<br \/>absorption of radio waves was recorded at the same time.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The geomagnetic field remains mostly calm, with the occurrence of<br \/>short active intervals. An increase in geomagnetic activity was<br \/>expected after the eruption of 17 March. A partial CME halo was<br \/>observed and ejected particles were expected in the vicinity of the<br \/>Earth first on 20 March, then on the evening of 20 March, and then<br \/>on the morning of 21 March. The result was an increase in MUF<br \/>already in the forenoon UTC.\u00a0 An increase in the Earth&#8217;s magnetic<br \/>field activity occurred in the afternoon.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The new sunspot group AR3615, which emerged in the southeast of the<br \/>solar disk, although not yet large, has a complex magnetic<br \/>structure. This configuration increases the probability of magnetic<br \/>reconnection during a solar flare. Especially if an X-class solar<br \/>flare occurs, the probability of CME will increase.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Angel Santana, WP3GW wrote about conditions on March 16 in an email:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;With much expectation worked the Russian DX contest on SSB, but<br \/>then noticed rough conditions, so bad that after 1600 UTC signals<br \/>were gone, not seen on my radio. After 1730 UTC saw them come back<br \/>but conditions were still bad.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Next day did the BARTG RTTY contest after 1430 UTC and fared<br \/>better.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Did it have to do with one of the six sunspots last week? Hope prop<br \/>is good in a week from now.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I replied that according to Spaceweather.com, departing sunspot<br \/>AR3599 blasted protons toward Earth on March 14, causing a polar cap<br \/>absorption event on March 16. The ionizing effect of the protons<br \/>absorbed radio signals inside the arctic circle.<\/p>\n<p>Nasa Space Flight article about VLA detection of radiation above<br \/>sunspots:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/4cDDref<\/p>\n<p>Article about Radio Blackout:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3ILT6KH<\/p>\n<p>From Dr. Tamitha Skov, WX6SWW:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Dear Tad,<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Recently our Sun gave us a surprise when a solar storm we thought<br \/>would be a glancing blow, actually hit us pretty hard. That was back<br \/>on March 3rd and some gorgeous aurora shows were seen in Tasmania<br \/>and Australia (see my forecast from that week for some amazing<br \/>pictures: https:\/\/youtu.be\/2nWLAYL01FA).<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Here we are several weeks later with yet another glancing blow set<br \/>to hit us midday March 20th. The official forecast is calling for a<br \/>weak impact, but our recent experience has left me wondering: Are we<br \/>are going to make the same mistake twice?<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;These are the kinds of dilemmas that make space weather such a<br \/>tough field today. Compared to terrestrial weather, there are so<br \/>many things we simply cannot foresee.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Turning to the forecast, big flare activity is beginning again<br \/>thanks to old Region 3590 rotating back into view along with some<br \/>new players as well. Amateur radio bands are getting noisier and<br \/>radio blackouts are resuming on the daylight side of Earth. Of<br \/>course, the big story is the solar storm coming towards us. Will it<br \/>be relatively mild at mid-latitudes, as the predictions suggest?<br \/>This time, I&#8217;m not so sure. Either way, I will remain on the<br \/>lookout.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Cheers, Tamitha.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Here is her latest video report:<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"A Solar Storm Comes with Flares on the Rise | Space Weather News 18 March 2024\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/O6vZDFaBfrc?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Send your tips, reports, observations, questions, and comments to<br \/>k7ra@arrl.net. When reporting observations, don&#8217;t forget to tell us<br \/>which mode you were operating.<\/p>\n<p>For more information concerning shortwave radio propagation, see<br \/> and the ARRL Technical Information<br \/>Service web page at,  . For<br \/>an explanation of numbers used in this bulletin, see<br \/> .<\/p>\n<p>An archive of past propagation bulletins is at<br \/> . More good<br \/>information and tutorials on propagation are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Also, check this <em>QST <\/em>article about Solar Indices:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Rc8Njt<\/p>\n<p>Instructions for starting or ending email distribution of ARRL<br \/>bulletins are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Sunspot numbers for March 14 through 20 2024 were 88, 49, 67, 86,<br \/>127, 123, and 120, with a mean of 94.3. 10.7 cm flux was 127.1, 129,<br \/>144.1, 151.3, 177.4, 168.9, and 175.5, with a mean of 153.3.<br \/>Estimated planetary A indices were 8, 8, 3, 3, 6, 9, and 4, with a<br \/>mean of 5.9. Middle latitude A index was 7, 8, 3, 2, 5, 7, and 3,<br \/>with a mean of 5.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-k7ra-solar-update-822?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>03\/22\/2024 Over March 14-20, new sunspot groups emerged every day except March19. March 18 had two, and each of the other days saw one new sunspotgroup. It is now Spring&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-779397","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/779397","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=779397"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/779397\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=779397"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=779397"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=779397"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}