{"id":780743,"date":"2024-04-12T12:31:03","date_gmt":"2024-04-12T17:31:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=780743"},"modified":"2024-04-12T12:31:03","modified_gmt":"2024-04-12T17:31:03","slug":"the-k7ra-solar-update-25","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=780743","title":{"rendered":"The K7RA Solar Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">04\/12\/2024<\/span><\/p>\n<p>I did not see last Monday&#8217;s eclipse, except on television. Here in<br \/>the Pacific Northwest, we only got a 20% exposure, and skies were<br \/>overcast.<\/p>\n<p>As they moved across the country displaying successive totality, I<br \/>noticed the prominences on the edge of the disk. There were always<br \/>between one and three little red spots at the edge.<\/p>\n<p>Solar activity over the past reporting week, April 4-10, remains<br \/>weak.<\/p>\n<p>Average daily sunspot number rose from 60 to 67.9, but average solar<br \/>flux declined from 136.9 to 123.2.<\/p>\n<p>Seven new sunspot groups emerged this week, one on April 4, three on<br \/>April 5, another on April 6, one more on April 8, and another on<br \/>April 10.<\/p>\n<p>Here is the outlook for the next few weeks, which does not seem<br \/>promising. Solar flux peaks at 160 over April 17-18.<\/p>\n<p>Predicted solar flux is 148, 150 and 155 on April 12-14, 158 on<br \/>April 15-16, 160 on April 17-18, 140 on April 19-20, 135 on April<br \/>21-22, 140 and 145 on April 23-24, 140 on April 25-26, then 135, 125<br \/>and 120 on April 27-29, and 125 on April 30 through May 10, then 130<br \/>on May 11-12, 135 on May 13-14, and 130 on May 15-18.<\/p>\n<p>Predicted planetary A index is quiet over the next month, starting<br \/>with 5, 8, 15, 10 and 8 on April 12-16, 5 on April 17-18, 8 and 10<br \/>on April 19-20, 8 on April 21-23, 5 on April 24-27, then 8, 8 and 7<br \/>on April 28-30, 10 on May 1-3, 5 on May 4-5, 8 on May 6-8, and 5 on<br \/>May 9-15, then 8 and 10 on May 16-17, and 8 on May 18-20.<\/p>\n<p>Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>Ionosphere &#8211; April 11, 2024, from F.K. Janda, OK1HH:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;At the end of March, it was still possible to see large sunspot<br \/>groups, during the last solar rotation marked as AR3614 and<br \/>especially the giant AR3615. We will see them again on the eastern<br \/>limb of the solar disk this weekend. This will end a roughly<br \/>two-week period of relatively quiet solar activity without major<br \/>solar flares.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The Sun&#8217;s total X-ray output, which has dropped by almost an order<br \/>of magnitude, will increase significantly, which will have a<br \/>beneficial effect on shortwave propagation.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Daily MUF values will gradually increase, while active regions will<br \/>be on the eastern half of the solar disk. For that reason, here will<br \/>be little probability of major geomagnetic disturbances. Of course,<br \/>now that the peak of the 11-year cycle is approaching, events such<br \/>as the eruption of solar plasma filaments that could affect the<br \/>Earth cannot be ruled out.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Dennis Wage, N9OQ of Plover, Wisconsin did a casual experiment<br \/>during the recent eclipse:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We did an experiment on 160m.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;During the eclipse we found that the band opened slightly and we had<br \/>very good copy on CW between some stations.\u00a0 The band then closed as<br \/>the eclipse ended.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Douglas Barbier, N8ZVT, wrote in an email:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Why is the solar flux so low, given the number of sunspots?\u00a0 What<br \/>else may be affecting the solar flux?<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This is my first solar maximum as a ham &#8211; and at my age, might be<br \/>the last. I had always heard stories of how 10m would be open 24<br \/>hours a day for voice and working all over the world with low power<br \/>SSB.\u00a0 Sure haven&#8217;t seen that yet at all.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I replied:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;That was nearly 70 years ago at the peak of Solar Cycle 19 when 10<br \/>meters was open 24\/7.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;There has never been a similar solar cycle since the dawn of radio.<br \/>It was all AM back then, no SSB.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Solar flux readings come from an observatory in Penticton, BC:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;https:\/\/www.spaceweather.gc.ca\/forecast-prevision\/solar-solaire\/solarflux\/sx-5-flux-en.php<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;I have not noticed that solar flux was low.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Because Earth is in an elliptical orbit around the Sun, a variation<br \/>in distance affects solar flux.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;That is why you will see adjusted values in the flux readings from<br \/>Penticton.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;You can get a graphic view of sunspot numbers and solar flux from<br \/>the WA4TTK solar data plotting utility at:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;http:\/\/www.craigcentral.com\/sol.asp<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;You can update the data automatically using data from this weekly<br \/>bulletin.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Solar cycles explained:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"GpAEMRWLWD\"><p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.snexplores.org\/article\/explainer-solar-cycle\">Explainer: What is the solar cycle?<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\" sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" style=\"position: absolute; clip: rect(1px, 1px, 1px, 1px);\" title=\"&#8220;Explainer: What is the solar cycle?&#8221; &#8212; Science News Explores\" src=\"https:\/\/www.snexplores.org\/article\/explainer-solar-cycle\/embed#?secret=ExUghhYtqk#?secret=GpAEMRWLWD\" data-secret=\"GpAEMRWLWD\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\"><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>A solar cycle clock:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41598-024-58960-5<\/p>\n<p>Flares during eclipse:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3VRBxk0<\/p>\n<p>Prominences, not flares:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/49waWMC<\/p>\n<p>Solar Cycles:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3PY4F5p<\/p>\n<p>Internet apocalypse due to solar storms:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3vBW69C<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Tamitha Skov, WX6SWW, reports during the eclipse:<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Live Total Solar Eclipse Party 08 April 2024\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/Z16_Uk1vym8?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Send your tips, reports, observations, questions, and comments to<br \/>k7ra@arrl.net. When reporting observations, don&#8217;t forget to tell us<br \/>which mode you were operating.<\/p>\n<p>For more information concerning shortwave radio propagation, see<br \/> and the ARRL Technical Information<br \/>Service web page at,  . For<br \/>an explanation of numbers used in this bulletin, see<br \/> .<\/p>\n<p>An archive of past propagation bulletins is at<br \/> . More good<br \/>information and tutorials on propagation are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Also, check this <em>QST <\/em>article about Solar Indices:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Rc8Njt<\/p>\n<p>Instructions for starting or ending email distribution of ARRL<br \/>bulletins are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Sunspot numbers for April 4 through 10 2024 were 47, 81, 71, 79, 79,<br \/>64, and 54, with a mean of 67.9. 10.7 cm flux was 113.7, 120.5,<br \/>122.9, 124.6, 124.8, 124.4, and 131.2, with a mean of 123.2.<br \/>Estimated planetary A indices were 12, 12, 10, 6, 8, 11, and 8, with<br \/>a mean of 9.6. Middle latitude A index was 33, 10, 8, 5, 8, 10, and<br \/>7, with a mean of 11.6.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-k7ra-solar-update-825?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>04\/12\/2024 I did not see last Monday&#8217;s eclipse, except on television. Here inthe Pacific Northwest, we only got a 20% exposure, and skies wereovercast. As they moved across the country&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-780743","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/780743","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=780743"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/780743\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=780743"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=780743"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=780743"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}