{"id":780807,"date":"2024-04-15T14:02:50","date_gmt":"2024-04-15T19:02:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=780807"},"modified":"2024-04-15T14:02:50","modified_gmt":"2024-04-15T19:02:50","slug":"you-cant-know-the-true-size-of-an-exoplanet-without-knowing-its-stars-magnetic-field","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=780807","title":{"rendered":"You Can&#8217;t Know the True Size of an Exoplanet Without Knowing its Star&#8217;s Magnetic Field"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>In 2011, astronomers with the Wide Angle Search for Planets (WASP) consortium detected a gas giant orbiting very close to a Sun-like (G-type) star about 700 light-years away. This planet is known as WASP-39b (aka. \u201cBocaprins\u201d), one of many \u201chot Jupiters\u201d discovered in recent decades that orbits its star at a distance of less than 5% the distance between the Earth and the Sun (0.05 AU). In 2022, shortly after the <em>James Webb Space Telescope <\/em>(JWST) it became the first exoplanet to have carbon dioxide and sulfur dioxide detected in its atmosphere. <\/p>\n<p>Alas, researchers have not constrained all of WASP-39b\u2019s crucial details (particularly its size) based on the planet\u2019s light curves, as observed by <em>Webb<\/em>. which is holding up more precise data analyses. In a new study led by the Max Planck Institute for Solar System Research (MPS), an international team has shown a way to overcome this obstacle. They argue that considering a parent star\u2019s magnetic field, the true size of an exoplanet in orbit can be determined. These findings are likely to significantly impact the rapidly expanding field of exoplanet study and characterization.<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-166627\"\/><\/p>\n<p>The study was led by Dr. Nadiia M. Kostogryz and her fellow researchers from the MPS. They were joined by astronomers and astrophysicists from the Center for Astronomy (Heidelberg University), the Astrophysics Group at Keele University, the Kavli Institute for Astrophysics and Space Research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), and the Space Telescope Science Institute (STScI). The paper describing their research, \u201cMagnetic origin of the discrepancy between stellar limb-darkening models and observations,\u201d was recently published in <em>Nature Astronomy.<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>The \u201chot Jupiter\u201d exoplanet WASP-69b orbits its star so closely that its atmosphere is being blown into space. Credit: Adam Makarenko\/W. M. Keck Observatory<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>A light curve is the measurement of a star\u2019s brightness over longer periods. Using the Transit Method (Transit Photometry), astronomers monitor stars for periodic dips in brightness, which can result from an exoplanet passing (transiting) in front of their face relative to the observer. In addition to being the most widely used method for detecting exoplanets, precise observations of light curves allow astronomers to estimate the size and orbital period of the exoplanets. <\/p>\n<p>These curves can also reveal information about the composition of the planet\u2019s atmosphere based on light passing through its atmosphere as it makes a transit \u2013 a technique known as \u201ctransit spectroscopy.\u201d Unfortunately, estimates on planet size suffer from an observational issue known as \u201climb darkening.\u201d Dr. Kostogryz explained in an MPS press statement:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>\u201cThe problems arising when interpreting the data from WASP-39b are well known from many other exoplanets \u2013 regardless [of] whether they are observed with Kepler, TESS, James Webb, or the future PLATO spacecraft. As with other stars orbited by exoplanets, the observed light curve of WASP-39 is flatter than previous models can explain.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The edge of the stellar disk (or \u201climb\u201d) plays a decisive role in interpreting a star\u2019s light curve. Since the limb corresponds to the star\u2019s outer (and cooler) layers, it appears darker to the observer than the inner area. However, the star does not actually shine less brightly further out. This \u201climb darkening\u201d affects the shape of the exoplanet signal in the light curve, as the dimming determines how steeply the curve falls during a planetary transit and then rises again. Historically, astronomers have not been able to reproduce observational data using conventional stellar models accurately. <\/p>\n<p>In every case, the decrease in the star\u2019s brightness was less abrupt than model calculations predicted. Clearly, something was missing from the models that prevented astronomers from reproducing exoplanet transit signals. As Dr. Kostogryz and her team discovered, the missing piece is stellar magnetic fields, which are generated by the motion of conductive plasma inside a star. The team first noticed this when examining selected light curves obtained by NASA\u2019s <em>Kepler Space Telescope<\/em> between 2009 and 2018.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"960\" height=\"540\" src=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Earth_s_protective_shield-ESA-ATG-medialab.jpeg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-156256\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Earth_s_protective_shield-ESA-ATG-medialab.jpeg 960w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Earth_s_protective_shield-ESA-ATG-medialab-580x326.jpeg 580w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Earth_s_protective_shield-ESA-ATG-medialab-250x141.jpeg 250w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/06\/Earth_s_protective_shield-ESA-ATG-medialab-768x432.jpeg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 89vw, (max-width: 1000px) 54vw, (max-width: 1071px) 543px, 580px\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>An illustration of Earth\u2019s magnetic field. Credit: ESA\/ATG medialab<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>The researchers also proved that the discrepancy between observational data and model calculations disappears if the star\u2019s magnetic field is included in the computations. To this end, the team turned to selected data from NASA\u2019s Kepler Space Telescope, which captured the light of thousands and thousands of stars from 2009 to 2018. To this end, they modeled the atmosphere of typical Kepler stars in the presence of a magnetic field and then simulated observational data based on these calculations. When they compared their results to real data, they found it accurately reproduced Kepler\u2019s observations.<\/p>\n<p>They also found that the strength of the magnetic field can have a profound effect, where limb darkening is more pronounced in stars with weak magnetic fields and less in stars with strong ones. Lastly, they extended their simulations to emission spectra data obtained by the JWST and found that the magnetic field of the parent star influences limb darkening differently at different wavelengths. These findings will help inform future exoplanet studies, leading to more precise estimates of the planets\u2019 characteristics. Said Dr. Alexander Shapiro, coauthor of the current study and head of an ERC-funded research group at the MPS:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote\">\n<p>\u201cIn the past decades and years, the way to move forward in exoplanet research was to improve the hardware, the space telescopes designed to search for and characterize new worlds. The James Webb Space Telescope has pushed this development to new limits. The next step is now to improve and refine the models to interpret this excellent data.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The researchers now plan to extend their analyses to stars different from the Sun, which could lead to refined estimates of exoplanet mass for rocky planets (similar to Earth). In addition, their findings indicate that the light curves of stars could be used to constrain the strength of stellar magnetic fields, another characteristic that is challenging to measure.<\/p>\n<p><em>Further Reading: MPS, Nature Astronomy<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-166627-661d7993c53cd\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/?ver=13.2#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=166627&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-166627-661d7993c53cd&amp;n=1\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-166627-661d7993c53cd\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/166627\/you-cant-know-the-true-size-of-an-exoplanet-without-knowing-its-stars-magnetic-field\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In 2011, astronomers with the Wide Angle Search for Planets (WASP) consortium detected a gas giant orbiting very close to a Sun-like (G-type) star about 700 light-years away. This planet&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":780808,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-780807","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/780807","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=780807"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/780807\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/780808"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=780807"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=780807"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=780807"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}