{"id":781523,"date":"2024-04-29T11:31:50","date_gmt":"2024-04-29T16:31:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=781523"},"modified":"2024-04-29T11:31:50","modified_gmt":"2024-04-29T16:31:50","slug":"jwst-uses-interferometry-mode-to-reveal-two-protoplanets-around-a-young-star","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=781523","title":{"rendered":"JWST Uses &#8220;Interferometry Mode&#8221; to Reveal Two Protoplanets Around a Young Star"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>The JWST is flexing its muscles with its interferometry mode. Researchers used it to study a well-known extrasolar system called PDS 70. The goal? To test the interferometry mode and see how it performs when observing a complex target. <\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-166757\"\/><\/p>\n<p>The mode uses the telescope\u2019s NIRISS (Near Infrared Imager and Slitless Spectrograph) as an interferometer. It\u2019s called Aperture Masking Interferometry (AMI) and it allows the JWST to reach its highest level of spatial resolution. <\/p>\n<p>A team of astronomers used the JWST\u2019s AMI to observe the PDS 70 system. PDS 70 is a young T-Tauri star about 5.4 million years old. At that young age, its protoplanetary disk still surrounds it. PDS 70 is a well-studied system that\u2019s caught the attention of astronomers. It\u2019s unique because its two planets, PDS 70 b and c, make it the only multiplanet protoplanetary disk system we know of. <\/p>\n<p>The researchers wanted to determine how easily the AMI would find PDS 70\u2019s two known planets and what else it could observe in the system. <\/p>\n<p>Their research is \u201cThe James Webb Interferometer: Space-based interferometric detections of PDS 70 b and c at 4.8 \u00b5m.\u201d It\u2019s available on the pre-print site arxiv.org and hasn\u2019t been peer-reviewed yet. The lead author is Dori Blakely from the Department of Physics and Astronomy at the University of Victoria, BC, Canada. <\/p>\n<p>PDS 70 is known for its pair of planets. PDS 70 b is about 3.2 Jupiter masses and follows a 123-year orbital period. PDS 70 c is about 7.5 Jupiter masses and follows a 191-year orbit. One of the most puzzling things about the system is that PDS 70 b appears to have its own accretion disk. The system also shows intriguing evidence of a third body, maybe another star. <\/p>\n<p>The JWST\u2019s interferometry easily detected both planets. In fact, the observations found evidence of circumplanetary disk emissions around PDS 70 b and c. \u201cOur photometry of both PDS 70 b and c provide evidence for circumplanetary disk emission,\u201d the researchers write. That means we can see the star and its protoplanetary disk, where planets form, and the individual circumplanetary disks around each planet. Those disks are where moons form, and seeing them in a system 366 light-years away is very impressive. <\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">The PDS 70 system as seen by the JWST\u2019s interferometry mode and after extensive data processing. A yellow star marks the location of PDS 70, with PDS 70 b and c also shown. The JWST shows the infrared emissions coming from the disk. Image Credit: Blakely et al. 2024. <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The JWST\u2019s AMI observations also found a third point source. Its light is different from the light from the pair of planets and more similar to the light from the star. If it\u2019s another planet, its composition is different from the others. If it\u2019s not another planet, that doesn\u2019t mean it necessarily has to be another star. The JWST could be seeing scattered starlight from another gaseous, dusty structure or clump in the disk. \u201cThis indicates that what we observe is not due to a simple inner disk structure, and may hint at a complex inner disk morphology such as a spiral or clumpy features,\u201d the researchers explain. <\/p>\n<p>The unexplained third source could be something more exotic. Previous research also identified the source and suggested that it could be an accretion stream flowing between PDS 70 b and c. \u201cWe interpret its signal in the direct vicinity of planet c as tracing the accretion stream feeding its circumplanetary disk,\u201d the authors of the previous research wrote. <\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"562\" src=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/PDS-70-Prior-Research-1024x562.png\" alt=\"These images are from previous research that used the JWST but not its interferometry mode. The top row is from the telescope's F187N filter, and the bottom row is from the telescope's F480M filter. The left column shows the complete images. The middle column shows the system with the disk subtracted. The right column shows the system with the disk and both known planets extracted. What remains is a potential third planet, planet &quot;d,&quot; and an arm-like feature and potential accretion stream. Image Credit: V. Christiaens et al. 2024.\" class=\"wp-image-166772\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/PDS-70-Prior-Research-1024x562.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/PDS-70-Prior-Research-580x318.png 580w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/PDS-70-Prior-Research-250x137.png 250w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/PDS-70-Prior-Research-768x421.png 768w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/PDS-70-Prior-Research.png 1250w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 89vw, (max-width: 1000px) 54vw, (max-width: 1071px) 543px, 580px\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">These images are from previous research that used the JWST but not its interferometry mode. The top row is from the telescope\u2019s F187N filter, and the bottom row is from the telescope\u2019s F480M filter. The left column shows the complete images. The middle column shows the system with the disk subtracted. The right column shows the system with the disk and both known planets extracted. What remains is a potential third planet, planet \u201cd,\u201d and an arm-like feature and potential accretion stream. Image Credit: V. Christiaens et al. 2024.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Or, perhaps most exciting, the source could be another planet. \u201cAnother scenario is that the signal we observe is due to an additional planet interior to the orbit of PDS 70 b,\u201d the authors explain. \u201cFollow-up observations will be needed to determine the nature of this emission,\u201d the authors write. <\/p>\n<p>Part of the observations\u2019 success comes from what it didn\u2019t detect. Protoplanetary disks are dusty and difficult to examine. The JWST has a leg up on it because it can see infrared light. When used in interferometry mode, it\u2019s a powerful tool. The fact that it failed to detect any other planets is progress, though. \u201cAdditionally, we place the deepest constraints on additional planets,\u201d in part of the disk. These constraints will help future researchers examine the PDS 70 system and other extrasolar systems.<\/p>\n<p>The results also show another of AMI\u2019s strengths: its ability to see into parts of the parameter space that other telescopes can\u2019t. \u201cFurthermore, our results show that NIRISS\/AMI can reliably measure relative astrometry and contrasts of young planets in a part of parameter space (small separations and moderate to high contrasts) that is unique to this observing mode, and inaccessible to all other present facilities at 4.8 \u00b5m,\u201d the authors explain. <\/p>\n<p>The JWST has already established its place in the history of astronomy. It\u2019s delivered on its promise and has already significantly contributed to our understanding of the cosmos. The telescope\u2019s observations with its Aperture Masking Interferometry mode will further cement its place in history. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cHere, using the power of the James Webb Interferometer, we detect PDS 70, its outer disk, and its two protoplanets, b and c. These are the first planets detected with space-based interferometry,\u201d the authors write.<\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-166757-662fc7fd41a86\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/?ver=13.2#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=166757&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-166757-662fc7fd41a86&amp;n=1\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-166757-662fc7fd41a86\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/166757\/jwst-uses-interferometry-mode-to-reveal-two-protoplanets-around-a-young-star\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The JWST is flexing its muscles with its interferometry mode. Researchers used it to study a well-known extrasolar system called PDS 70. The goal? To test the interferometry mode and&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":781524,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-781523","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/781523","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=781523"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/781523\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/781524"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=781523"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=781523"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=781523"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}