{"id":781981,"date":"2024-05-07T17:45:58","date_gmt":"2024-05-07T22:45:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=781981"},"modified":"2024-05-07T17:45:58","modified_gmt":"2024-05-07T22:45:58","slug":"fall-into-a-black-hole-with-this-new-nasa-simulation","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=781981","title":{"rendered":"Fall Into a Black Hole With this New NASA Simulation"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>No human being will ever encounter a black hole. But we can\u2019t stop wondering what it would be like to fall into one of these massive, beguiling, physics-defying singularities. <\/p>\n<p>NASA created a simulation to help us imagine what it would be like. <\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-166903\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Jeremy Schnittman is an astrophysicist at NASA\u2019s Goddard Space Flight Center and he created the visualizations. \u201cPeople often ask about this, and simulating these difficult-to-imagine processes helps me connect the mathematics of relativity to actual consequences in the real universe,\u201d he said. \u201cSo I simulated two different scenarios, one where a camera \u2014 a stand-in for a daring astronaut \u2014 just misses the event horizon and slingshots back out, and one where it crosses the boundary, sealing its fate.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In one, the viewpoint plunges directly into the black hole like a free-falling astronaut, with explanatory text to guide us through what we\u2019re seeing. The other is a 360-degree view of the black hole. <\/p>\n<p>Schnittman created them with a NASA supercomputer called Discover in only five days, generating about 10 terabytes of data. The computer used only about 0.3% of its power. The same visualization would\u2019ve taken more than a decade to create on an average laptop computer. <\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<p>\n<span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"NASA Simulation\u2019s Plunge Into a Black Hole: Explained\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/chhcwk4-esM?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/figure>\n<p>The black hole in the visualization is the same size as Sagittarius A star, the supermassive black hole (SMBH) at the heart of the Milky Way. It has 4.3 million solar masses and dominates the galaxy\u2019s inner regions. Its event horizon reaches about 25 million km (16 million miles). That\u2019s about 17% of the distance from Earth to the Sun. The event horizon is surrounded by an accretion disk, a swirling disk of superheated material drawn in by the black hole\u2019s overpowering gravity. <\/p>\n<p>Another type of black hole, the stellar-mass black hole, is much less massive. Schnittman says that if you\u2019re going to fall into a black hole, you\u2019d rather fall into the supermassive one. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIf you have the choice, you want to fall into a supermassive black hole,\u201d Schnittman explained. \u201cStellar-mass black holes, which contain up to about 30 solar masses, possess much smaller event horizons and stronger tidal forces, which can rip apart approaching objects before they get to the horizon.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Powerful gravity is the reason. The SMBH\u2019s gravity is so strong that it pulls harder on the end of the object nearest it. That stretches the object and elongates it. Stephen Hawking was the first to call this \u2018spaghettification,\u2019 and the name has stuck. Presumably, you\u2019d get a better look if you fall into an SMBH. <\/p>\n<p>In the movies, the camera begins at a distance of 640 million km (400 million miles.) Since space-time is warped around a black hole, so are the images of the sky, the black hole\u2019s disk, and the photon ring. It takes the camera three hours of real-time to fall into the event horizon, and it completes almost two 30-minute orbits as it falls. A distant observer would never see an object ever reach the black hole. From a distance, the object would freeze at the event horizon. <\/p>\n<p>When a falling object reaches the event horizon, it and space-time itself reach the speed of light. After crossing the horizon, the object and the space-time around it surge toward the singularity, a point of infinite density and gravity. \u201cOnce the camera crosses the horizon, its destruction by spaghettification is just 12.8 seconds away,\u201d Schnittman said. <\/p>\n<p>In the second video, the camera never crosses the event horizon and instead escapes. But the powerful black hole still has an effect. Imagine if the camera were an astronaut, and they flew this six-hour roundtrip while a separate astronaut stayed far away from the SMBH. The astronaut would return and be 36 minutes younger than the astronaut who never approached the black hole. <\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<p>\n<span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"360 Video: NASA Simulation Shows a Flight Around a Black Hole\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/dGEIsnBRWGs?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/figure>\n<p>\u201cThis situation can be even more extreme,\u201d Schnittman noted. \u201cIf the black hole were rapidly rotating, like the one shown in the 2014 movie \u2018Interstellar,\u2019 she would return many years younger than her shipmates.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The bottom line is, don\u2019t fall into a black hole. In fact, resist your fascination and don\u2019t even approach one. <\/p>\n<p>Leave them for the physicists. <\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-166903-663aad5b6140d\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/?ver=13.2#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=166903&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-166903-663aad5b6140d&amp;n=1\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-166903-663aad5b6140d\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/166903\/fall-into-a-black-hole-with-this-new-nasa-simulation\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>No human being will ever encounter a black hole. But we can\u2019t stop wondering what it would be like to fall into one of these massive, beguiling, physics-defying singularities. NASA&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":781982,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-781981","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/781981","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=781981"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/781981\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/781982"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=781981"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=781981"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=781981"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}