{"id":782463,"date":"2024-05-16T14:15:50","date_gmt":"2024-05-16T19:15:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=782463"},"modified":"2024-05-16T14:15:50","modified_gmt":"2024-05-16T19:15:50","slug":"scientists-test-for-quantum-gravity","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=782463","title":{"rendered":"Scientists Test for Quantum Gravity"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>The tension between quantum mechanics and relativity has long been a central split in modern-day physics. Developing a theory of quantum gravity remains one of the great outstanding challenges of the discipline. And yet, no one has yet been able to do it. But as we collect more data, it shines more light on the potential solution, even if some of that data happens to show negative results.<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-167022\"\/><\/p>\n<p>That happened recently with a review of data collected at IceCube, a neutrino detector located in the Antarctic ice sheet, and compiled by researchers at the University of Texas at Arlington. They looked for signs that gravity could vary even a minuscule amount based on quantum mechanical fluctuations. And, to put it bluntly, they didn\u2019t find any evidence of that happening.<\/p>\n<p>To check for these minuscule fluctuations, they analyzed more than 300,000 detected neutrinos that IceCube had captured. IceCube is an impressive engineering feat, with thousands of sensors buried over one sq km in the ice. When one of the detectors is triggered by one of a hundred trillions of neutrinos passing through it every second, data on whether it was affected by any perturbations in the local gravity of that area can be collected.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<p>\n<span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"The Search for Neutrinos. Catching These Elusive Particles in a Gigaton of Ice\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/MVJpi6EsNC8?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/span>\n<\/p><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Fraser discusses the neutrino detectors of IceCube.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Such massive data sets allowed for a very accurate reading\u2014\u201dover a million times more [accurate],\u201d according to Dr. Benjamin Jones, one of over 300 physicists who worked on a paper detailing IceCube\u2019s findings, which he described in a press release from the University of Texas at Arlington. Despite that, the researchers were still unable to find any evidence for those quantum fluctuations in the local gravitational field.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s not all bad news, though. Eliminating one possible explanation for quantum gravity could lead to work on others. Dr. Jones sees that prospect as he describes how his lab\u2019s efforts are shifting to studying the mass of neutrinos themselves. Understanding more about these elusive particles certainly won\u2019t hurt efforts to understand the overall physical model of the universe. Still, many scientists are likely disappointed by this newest failure to find a potential lead in the solution to a \u201ctheory of everything.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>For now, IceCube will keep collecting data, and scientists will continue to analyze it. But efforts to find a new theory of quantum gravity seem to be back at the theoretical drawing\u2014which is a necessary step before they can be tested, no matter how fancy the detector itself is.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<p>\n<span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Quantum Gravity and the Hardest Problem in Physics | Space Time\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/YNEBhwimJWs?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/span>\n<\/p><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">PBS Spacetime explains the idea behind quantum gravity.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Learn More:<br \/>UTA \u2013 UTA SCIENTISTS TEST FOR QUANTUM NATURE OF GRAVITY<br \/>IceCube Collaboration \u2013 Search for decoherence from quantum gravity with atmospheric neutrinos<br \/>UT \u2013 Scientists are Recommending IceCube Should be Eight Times Bigger<br \/>UT \u2013 IceCube Makes a Neutrino Map of the Milky Way<\/p>\n<p>Lead Image:<br \/>IceCube Lab under the stars in the Antarctic.<br \/>Credit \u2013 IceCube\/NSF<\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-167022-664657f19f646\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/?ver=13.2#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=167022&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-167022-664657f19f646&amp;n=1\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-167022-664657f19f646\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/167022\/scientists-test-for-quantum-gravity\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The tension between quantum mechanics and relativity has long been a central split in modern-day physics. Developing a theory of quantum gravity remains one of the great outstanding challenges of&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":782464,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-782463","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/782463","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=782463"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/782463\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/782464"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=782463"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=782463"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=782463"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}