\n
Most rogue planets are likely to be frozen worlds<\/p>\n
Shutterstock\/Artsiom P<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p>\n
Imagine a world where it is always night, no matter the time of day or year. There are no days or years, in fact, because there is no sun, meaning no cycle of daylight to mark time\u2019s passing. And if there are moons, they are barely visible. For this is a lonely world, drifting through interstellar space.<\/p>\n
Rogue planets, as they are known, do exist \u2013 and there are probably a lot of them. They could outnumber stars by up to 20 times, according to a 2023 analysis by David Bennett at NASA\u2019s Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland and his colleagues, which would mean there are possibly trillions of them in our galaxy alone.<\/p>\n
That might sound like an outlandishly large number, given that we tend to think of planets orbiting stars. But the existence of free-floating planets is perfectly compatible with planetary formation theory. \u201cHonestly, I was not surprised to find that rogue planets may outnumber stars,\u201d says Gavin Coleman at Queen Mary University of London.<\/p>\n
Which isn\u2019t to say astronomers aren\u2019t awestruck by the prospect. \u201cIt\u2019s beautiful to imagine,\u201d says Lisa Kaltenegger at Cornell University in Ithaca, New York. \u201cBillions of planets that have no home any more, that are just basically travelling through the galaxy.\u201d<\/p>\n
We can\u2019t see rogue planets directly. Since the first candidate was discovered in 2012, we have been inferring their presence by the way they bend the light coming from more\u2026<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n
\n
Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Most rogue planets are likely to be frozen worlds Shutterstock\/Artsiom P Imagine a world where it is always night, no matter the time of day or year. There are no… <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":782596,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-782595","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-new-scientist"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/782595","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=782595"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/782595\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/782596"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=782595"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=782595"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=782595"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}