{"id":783584,"date":"2024-06-06T08:26:50","date_gmt":"2024-06-06T13:26:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=783584"},"modified":"2024-06-06T08:26:50","modified_gmt":"2024-06-06T13:26:50","slug":"its-time-for-hardworking-hubble-to-slow-down-a-little","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=783584","title":{"rendered":"It&#8217;s Time for Hardworking Hubble to Slow Down a Little"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>Thirty-four years is a long time for a telescope. Yet, that is how long the veteran workhorse of NASA\u2019s space telescope fleet has been operating. Admittedly, Hubble was served by several repair missions during the space shuttle era. Still, the system has been floating in the void and taking some of humanity\u2019s most breathtaking pictures ever captured since April 24th, 1990. But now, time seems to be finally catching up with it, as NASA plans to limit some of its operations to ensure its continued life, starting with gyroscopes.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-167294\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Hubble has six gyroscopes, which are intended to help it orient in the right direction and ensure it stays oriented in that direction while it takes the extremely long-exposure, detailed images it is famous for. The six gyroscopes currently installed replaced six older ones during the final shuttle servicing mission in 2009. As one of the few moving components on Hubble, lasting 15 years without maintenance is pretty impressive.<\/p>\n<p>That being said, not all of them lasted that long \u2013 only three are operational at this point, with the other three having failed at some point over the last 15 years. And on May 24th, the telescope was sent into safe mode by another failed gyro. This isn\u2019t the first time that particular problem has happened either. Previous errors caused by the same gyro have caused Hubble to go into safe mode multiple times over the past few months. While engineers can reset it, the same problem repeatedly happening means it will probably continue.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<p>\n<span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Hubble Space Telescope Gyroscope Failure - How Scientists Will Keep It Alive\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/MY169HtCazE?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/span>\n<\/p><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Scott Manley explains how the gyros work on Hubble, and how the engineers plan to keep them working.<br \/>Credit \u2013 Scott Manley YouTube Channel<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The problem is that the gyro is \u201csaturating,\u201d meaning that the sensor that shows its speed is maxing out even when the gyro itself isn\u2019t moving near that speed. Since the spacecraft slewing at maximum speed could cause potential issues, the safe thing to do when reading a maximum speed on a gyro is to go into \u201csafe mode\u201d and ensure the spacecraft doesn\u2019t wildly swing in one direction.<\/p>\n<p>Operating in that mode makes sense, especially if the sensor readings are correct, but they make it almost impossible to move accurately if sensor readings aren\u2019t correct. Given the previous efforts by Hubble\u2019s engineering team to fix the problem, it appears at least one of the three remaining gyros is effectively inoperable from now on. So, the team now has a choice.<\/p>\n<p>They could continue to operate with two gyros, or they could only use one and alternate which one they are using to not cause undue wear and tear on whichever one is selected for service first. According to a press release from the agency, operating with two gyros is effectively the same as operating with one, whereas operating with three had significant advantages in terms of speed and accuracy. So, the engineering team has decided that Hubble will operate in one gyro mode from now on.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-4-3 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<p>\n<span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Hubble Space Telescope - eXtreme Deep Field\" width=\"1110\" height=\"833\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/d8jxzefJIls?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/span>\n<\/p><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Fraser discusses some of Hubble\u2019s most iconic images \u2013 it\u2019s set of Deep Fields.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>This isn\u2019t the first time it\u2019s done so\u2014Hubble effectively operated in one-gryo mode for a short time back in 2008 when the previous set of gyros was failing. It also operated in two-gyro mode from 2005 to 2009, when all the original gyros were replaced. So it is certainly possible, but what impact will it have?<\/p>\n<p>It will take longer to lock on to targets, which is hardly surprising given the telescope\u2019s age, but detrimental if it was hoping to catch transient events such as a supernova. It also won\u2019t be able to track any moving objects that are closer than Mars, such as the occasional comet or asteroid. Typically, those types of objects weren\u2019t the focal point of Hubble\u2019s observations anyway. While Hubble will indeed have to slow down, its support team believes it can continue operations through at least the rest of this decade in this new mode.<\/p>\n<p>Luckily, it is no longer alone in its role as the workhorse space telescope. The James Webb Space Telescope has far surpassed its observational capabilities; the Nancy Grace Roman Telescope, due to launch in 2027, will contribute additional functionality to make up for Hubble\u2019s slowing pace. Hubble itself will always have a place in astronomy nerds\u2019 hearts. Its Deep Field image is my favorite picture and sparked my love for astronomy as a kid. And I\u2019m not alone \u2013 NASA recently rejected billionaire Jared Isaacman\u2019s plan to service the aging telescope as part of a series of Dragon capsule missions. But even without additional help from the ground, Hubble hopefully still has a long, fruitful life ahead of it when it continues its science operations in mid-June.<\/p>\n<p>Learn More:<br \/>NASA \u2013 NASA to Change How It Points Hubble Space Telescope<br \/>UT \u2013 Hubble Pauses its Science Again<br \/>UT \u2013 The Venerable Hubble Space Telescope Keeps Delivering<br \/>UT \u2013 Hubble Sees a Brand New Triple Star System<\/p>\n<p>Lead Image:<br \/>This image of NASA\u2019s Hubble Space Telescope was taken on May 19, 2009, after deployment during Servicing Mission 4. <br \/>Credit \u2013 NASA<\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-167294-6661b66e45367\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/?ver=13.2#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=167294&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-167294-6661b66e45367&amp;n=1\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-167294-6661b66e45367\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/167294\/its-time-for-hardworking-hubble-to-slow-down-a-little\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Thirty-four years is a long time for a telescope. Yet, that is how long the veteran workhorse of NASA\u2019s space telescope fleet has been operating. Admittedly, Hubble was served by&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":783585,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-783584","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/783584","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=783584"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/783584\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/783585"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=783584"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=783584"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=783584"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}