{"id":783749,"date":"2024-06-08T11:44:54","date_gmt":"2024-06-08T16:44:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=783749"},"modified":"2024-06-08T11:44:54","modified_gmt":"2024-06-08T16:44:54","slug":"euclid-is-finding-free-floating-planets-in-orion-too","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=783749","title":{"rendered":"Euclid is Finding Free Floating Planets in Orion Too"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>There are likely millions of \u201crogue\u201d or free-floating planets (FFPs) spread through the galaxy. These planets, which aren\u2019t big enough to become stars but also aren\u2019t beholden to a star\u2019s gravity, are some of the hardest objects for astronomers to spot, as they don\u2019t give off their own light, and can only be seen when they cross in front of something that does give off its own light. Enter Euclid, a space telescope that launched last year. Its primary mission is to observe the universe\u2019s history, but a new paper describes an exciting side project \u2013 finding FFPs in Orion.<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-167326\"\/><\/p>\n<p>In particular, it is finding FFPs around a system known as Sigma Orionis. Famously located on the eastern side of Orion\u2019s Belt, this \u201cstar\u201d is a system of at least five different stars, all gravitationally bound in one way or another, forming what is known as a \u201ccluster.\u201d It\u2019s also surrounded by a \u201cdust wave\u201d of particles pointing at the nearby Horsehead Nebula, all of which lends itself to being a place where it would be easy to find FFPs.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Free-floating planets of this type can also be considered \u201cfailed stars\u201d as they did not have enough mass to start the fusion process that comes with star formation. This isn\u2019t the first time they\u2019ve been found in star-forming regions. Other FFPs have been found in NGC 1333, Collider 69, and even the Orion Nebula. This isn\u2019t even the first time they\u2019ve been found in Sigma Orionis \u2013 but it is the first time they\u2019ve been detected with the accuracy Euclid allows. As the paper\u2019s authors put it, they \u201cappear to be ubiquitous and numerous.\u201d<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<p>\n<span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Interview: Dr. Maggie Lieu, Euclid and the Dark Universe\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/iQSLIIi1TRQ?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/span>\n<\/p><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Fraser interviews Dr. Maggie Lieu about Euclid and its capabilities<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>So, what\u2019s unique about what Euclid did? Admittedly, the paper was a sort of test run for the telescope. The observations were taken back in October, only a few months after it launched in the middle of 2023. Those observations also focused on regions well known to contain tons of FFPs already. So what did it find?<\/p>\n<p>They found a bunch of much smaller FFPs than had previously been found. Astronomers use an algorithm called the Initial Mass Function (IMF) to describe the number of stars of specific sizes that would be formed. FFPs define the lower limit of that IMF \u2013 i.e., if an object isn\u2019t big enough to become a star, it becomes an FFP. Sufficiently smaller FFPs help astronomers define the limits of the IMF in certain regions, but so far, they have escaped the notice of less sensitive detectors.<\/p>\n<p>That\u2019s where Euclid comes in. The authors point out how the lower end of the IMF is not well defined and describe how the data collected by Euclid could be used to flesh out models at the lower end of the spectrum. However, they also point out that this is still very early in Euclid\u2019s data collection cycle, and plenty more systems could prove exciting hunting grounds for smaller FFPs than have ever been seen before.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<p>\n<span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Two Supernovae Hit Earth \/\/ Rogue Planets in Orion Nebula \/\/ A Star That Disappeared\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/lVQMBANcrQU?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/span>\n<\/p><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Fraser discusses rogue planets in the Orion Nebula<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>For now, though, this is an excellent first test case of Euclid\u2019s capabilities. Given the sheer number of objects that could be floating out there in the void, it will have plenty of other opportunities to find more, and it has already started looking in several other well-known places, according to the paper. It\u2019s got more than five years left on its planned mission duration, so there will undoubtedly be more papers describing many more FFPs in the future.<\/p>\n<p>Learn More:<br \/>Mart\u00edn et al \u2013 Euclid: Early Release Observations \u2013 A glance at free-floating new-born planets in the ? Orionis cluster<br \/>UT \u2013 Enjoy Five New Images from the Euclid Mission<br \/>UT \u2013 Euclid Begins its 6-Year Survey of the Dark Universe<br \/>UT \u2013 Phew, De-Icing Euclid\u2019s Instruments Worked. It\u2019s Seeing Better Now<\/p>\n<p>Lead Image:<br \/>Multi-color mosaic of the Euclid pointing studied in this work. The area covered is 0.58 square degrees<br \/>Credit \u2013 Mart\u00edn et al<\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-167326-66648a28d8fa7\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/?ver=13.2#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=167326&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-167326-66648a28d8fa7&amp;n=1\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-167326-66648a28d8fa7\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/167326\/euclid-is-finding-free-floating-planets-in-orion-too\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>There are likely millions of \u201crogue\u201d or free-floating planets (FFPs) spread through the galaxy. These planets, which aren\u2019t big enough to become stars but also aren\u2019t beholden to a star\u2019s&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":783750,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-783749","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/783749","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=783749"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/783749\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/783750"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=783749"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=783749"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=783749"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}