{"id":784141,"date":"2024-06-14T09:54:32","date_gmt":"2024-06-14T14:54:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=784141"},"modified":"2024-06-14T09:54:32","modified_gmt":"2024-06-14T14:54:32","slug":"the-k7ra-solar-update-32","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=784141","title":{"rendered":"The K7RA Solar Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">06\/14\/2024<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;ASWFC GEOMAGNETIC DISTURBANCE WARNING ISSUED AT 0650 UTC\/14 JUNE 2024 BY THE AUSTRALIAN SPACE WEATHER FORECASTING CENTRE.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A weak halo CME may impact Earth either on late UTC day 15-Jun or<br \/>else early UTC day 16-Jun.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;INCREASED GEOMAGNETIC ACTIVITY EXPECTED DUE TO CORONAL MASS EJECTION FROM 15-16 JUNE 2024&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Solar activity was lower over the past reporting week, June 6-12.<\/p>\n<p>Ten new sunspot groups emerged, two on June 6, one on June 7, two on<br \/>June 9, and five on June 12.<\/p>\n<p>Average daily sunspot number dropped from 44 points from 183.4 to<br \/>139.4, and average daily solar flux from 184.8 to 179.2.<\/p>\n<p>Average daily planetary A index went from 8 to 11.6, and middle<br \/>latitude numbers from 9.4 to 11.1.<\/p>\n<p>The most active day geomagnetically was June 7, when the planetary A<br \/>index was 28. Alaska&#8217;s College A index was 38. This was an<br \/>unexpected G2 geomagnetic storm that commenced at 1130 UTC.<\/p>\n<p>Spaceweather.com reports a polar cap absorption event on June 12-13.<br \/>Protons from the Sun are raining down on Earth, and it is causing<br \/>shortwave blackouts. You can monitor it here:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Vpopko<\/p>\n<p>Predicted solar flux shows a peak at 205 on June 26-29 and again on<br \/>July 23-26.<\/p>\n<p>The forecast shows flux at 170 on June 14, 175 on June 15-17, then<br \/>180 on June 18-20, then 185, 190 and 195 on June 21-23, 200 on June<br \/>24-25, 205 on June 26-29, then 200, 190, 180, 175, 170, 165, 160 and<br \/>175 on June 30 through July 7, then 170 on July 8-9, 165 on July<br \/>10-11, 155 on July 12-13, then 165 and 175 on July 14-15, 185 on<br \/>July 16-18, then 190, 195 and 200 on July 19-21.<\/p>\n<p>Predicted planetary A index is 5, 12 and 15 on June 14-16, then 8 on<br \/>June 17-18, then 5 on June 19-21, then 8 on Jun 22-23, then 5 on<br \/>June 24-29, 8 on June 30 and July 1, and 5 on July 2-6, then 8 on<br \/>July 7, 5 on July 8-15, then 8, 8, 5, 8 and 8 on July on July 16-20.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>Ionosphere &#8211; June 13, 2024, from OK1HH:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Despite the fact that the large sunspot group responsible for the<br \/>geomagnetic disturbances and the beautiful auroras of May 10-11 is<br \/>now on the far side of the Sun, its flares are showering the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>surroundings with a rain of protons. On the whole, however, there is<br \/>no doubt that after its reappearance at the eastern edge of the<br \/>solar disk, solar activity will again increase significantly, with<br \/>solar flux values exceeding 200 in late June and early July.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;For now, we will be content with the consequences of a slight<br \/>decrease in overall solar activity, although moderate solar flares<br \/>are no exception. Upswells in geomagnetic activity occur only<br \/>occasionally and most days are quiet to unsettled. Summer prevails<br \/>in the Earth&#8217;s northern hemisphere, and sporadic-E layer events<br \/>contribute even more than solar events to the erratic shortwave<br \/>propagation conditions here.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;With the exception of the two largest active regions, however,<br \/>there is little going on at present on the far side of the Sun, and<br \/>so July already seems to be considerably quieter than May and June<br \/>were.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Radiation risks for Mars astronauts:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/4b272M7<\/p>\n<p>Viewing sunspots from Mars:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/go.nasa.gov\/3RsTP87<\/p>\n<p>May solar images from various online sources:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/45lmVvS<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3VFwCCb<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/www.space.com\/sun-solar-storm-may-10-timelapse<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bigthink.com\/hard-science\/sun-activity-2024\/<\/p>\n<p>Next weekend is ARRL Field Day, June 22-23. Solar flux and sunspot<br \/>numbers should be rising at that time, and predicted planetary A<br \/>index is a moderate 8.<\/p>\n<p>There will be an updated forecast in next week&#8217;s bulletin.<\/p>\n<p>Send your tips, reports, observations, questions and comments to<br \/>k7ra@arrl.net. When reporting observations, don&#8217;t forget to tell us<br \/>which mode you were operating.<\/p>\n<p>For more information concerning shortwave radio propagation, see<br \/> and the ARRL Technical Information<br \/>Service web page at,  . For<br \/>an explanation of numbers used in this bulletin, see<br \/> .<\/p>\n<p>An archive of past propagation bulletins is at<br \/> . More good<br \/>information and tutorials on propagation are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Also, check this QST article about Solar Indices:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Rc8Njt<\/p>\n<p>Instructions for starting or ending email distribution of ARRL<br \/>bulletins are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Sunspot numbers for June 6 through 12 2024 were 149, 150, 143, 148,<br \/>146, 95, and 145, with a mean of 139.4. 10.7 cm flux was 190.9,<br \/>184.4, 190.4, 180.9, 177.8, 164.9, and 164.9, with a mean of 179.2.<br \/>Estimated planetary A indices were 6, 28, 14, 5, 11, 12, and 5, with<br \/>a mean of 11.6. Middle latitude A index was 7, 20, 15, 6, 11, 13,<br \/>and 6, with a mean of 11.1.<br \/>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-k7ra-solar-update-832?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>06\/14\/2024 &#8220;ASWFC GEOMAGNETIC DISTURBANCE WARNING ISSUED AT 0650 UTC\/14 JUNE 2024 BY THE AUSTRALIAN SPACE WEATHER FORECASTING CENTRE. &#8220;A weak halo CME may impact Earth either on late UTC day&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-784141","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/784141","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=784141"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/784141\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=784141"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=784141"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=784141"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}