{"id":784431,"date":"2024-06-20T12:31:50","date_gmt":"2024-06-20T17:31:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=784431"},"modified":"2024-06-20T12:31:50","modified_gmt":"2024-06-20T17:31:50","slug":"slingshotting-around-the-sun-would-make-a-spacecraft-the-faster-ever","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=784431","title":{"rendered":"Slingshotting Around the Sun Would Make a Spacecraft the Faster Ever"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>NASA is very interested in developing a propulsion method to allow spacecraft to go faster. We\u2019ve reported several times on different ideas to support that goal, and most of the more successful have utilized the Sun\u2019s gravity well, typically by slingshotting around it, as is commonly done with Jupiter currently. But, there are still significant hurdles when doing so, not the least of which is the energy radiating from the Sun simply vaporizing anything that gets close enough to utilize a gravity assist. That\u2019s the problem a project supported by NASA\u2019s Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC) and run by Jason Benkoski, now of Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, is trying to solve.<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-167460\"\/><\/p>\n<p>The project was awarded a NIAC Phase I grant in 2022, focused on combining two separate systems \u2013 a heat shield and a thermal propellant system. According to the project\u2019s final report, combining those two technologies could allow a spacecraft to perform what is known as an Oberth maneuver around the Sun. In this orbital mechanics trick, a spacecraft uses the Sun\u2019s gravity well to slingshot itself at high speeds in the direction it aims. It\u2019s similar to the Sundiver technology discussed in other articles.<\/p>\n<p>So, what makes this project unique? One thing is the heat shield \u2013 Dr. Benkoski and his team developed a material that is capable of withstanding up to 2700 K. While that is still not anywhere near the temperature of the Sun\u2019s surface, which can reach up to 5800 K, its enough to get pretty close, and thereby unlock a spacecraft\u2019s ability to use an Oberth maneuver in the first place.\u00a0<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Image of the test set-up for the thermal shield.<br \/>Credit \u2013 Benkoski et al.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Samples of the material with these thermal properties have already been produced. However, further research is needed to understand whether they\u2019re cut out for space flight. And a heat shield alone isn\u2019t enough to perform the maneuver \u2013 a spacecraft also must have a propulsion system that can withstand those temperatures.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>A solar thermal propulsion system could potentially do so. These systems use the Sun\u2019s energy to pressurize their own propellant and then expel those propellants out to gain thrust, which is a necessary component of an Oberth maneuver. There are several different types of fuels that could work for such a system, and a large chunk of the research in the Phase I project looked at the different costs\/benefits of each.<\/p>\n<p>Hydrogen is one of the more common fuels considered for a solar thermal propulsion system. Though it is lightweight, it requires a bulky cryogenic system to store the hydrogen because it is heated to the point of being used as thrust. In the end, its trade-offs made it the least effective of the propellants considered during the project.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"851\" height=\"451\" src=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Screenshot-2024-06-20-130229.jpg\" alt=\"Graphic depicting the development path for the solar thermal propulsion system.\" class=\"wp-image-167462\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Screenshot-2024-06-20-130229.jpg 851w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Screenshot-2024-06-20-130229-580x307.jpg 580w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Screenshot-2024-06-20-130229-250x132.jpg 250w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/06\/Screenshot-2024-06-20-130229-768x407.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 89vw, (max-width: 1000px) 54vw, (max-width: 1071px) 543px, 580px\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Graphic depicting the development path for the solar thermal propulsion system.<br \/>Credit \u2013 Benkoski et al.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Lithium hydride was the surprise winner for the fuel that allows for the fastest escape velocity. Calculations show it could result in a velocity of over 12 AU \/ yr. However, there are constraints with the fuel\u2019s storage and handling.<\/p>\n<p>Dr. Benkoski settled on a more mundane fuel as the overall winner of the modeling he did \u2013 methane. While it generally results in a slower final velocity than lithium hydride, its final speed is still respectable at over 10 AU \/ yr. It also eliminates many storage hassles of other propellants, such as the cryogenics required to store hydrogen.<\/p>\n<p>There are some drawbacks, though \u2013 the calculated maximum speed is only about 1.7 times faster than what could already be done with a gravitational assist from Jupiter, which wouldn\u2019t require all the fancy thermal shielding. There are other downsides to that, though, such as the direction the spacecraft can travel in being limited by where Jupiter is in relation to other objects of interest. Orbiting the Sun, on the other hand, it is possible to reach pretty much anywhere in the solar system and beyond with the right controlled burn.<\/p>\n<p>As Dr. Benkoski notes in the final report, he made plenty of assumptions when doing his modeling calculations, including that the system would only be able to use already-developed technologies rather than speculative ones that could dramatically impact the results. For now, it doesn\u2019t seem NASA has selected this project to move on to Phase II, and it\u2019s unclear what future work is planned for further development. If nothing else, it is a step toward understanding what would be necessary to truly send spacecraft past the Sun and into deep space at a speed much faster than anything else has gone before. Given NASA\u2019s continual attention to this topic, undoubtedly, someday, one of the missions will succeed in doing so.<\/p>\n<p>Learn More:<br \/>Benkoski et al \u2013 Combined Heat Shield and Solar Thermal Propulsion System for an Oberth Maneuver<br \/>UT \u2013 Tiny Spacecraft Using Solar Sails Open Up a Solar System of Opportunity<br \/>UT \u2013 Want the Fastest Solar Sail? Drop it Into the Sun First<br \/>UT \u2013 A Mission to Reach the Solar Gravitational Lens in 30 Years<\/p>\n<p>Lead Image:<br \/>Graphic of a solar thermal propulsion system undergoing a Oberth maneuver around the Sun.<br \/>Credit \u2013 Jason Benkoski<\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-167460-667464edd36df\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/?ver=13.2#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=167460&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-167460-667464edd36df&amp;n=1\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-167460-667464edd36df\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/167460\/slingshotting-around-the-sun-would-make-a-spacecraft-the-faster-ever\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>NASA is very interested in developing a propulsion method to allow spacecraft to go faster. We\u2019ve reported several times on different ideas to support that goal, and most of the&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":784432,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-784431","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/784431","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=784431"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/784431\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/784432"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=784431"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=784431"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=784431"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}