{"id":785713,"date":"2024-07-13T07:57:52","date_gmt":"2024-07-13T12:57:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=785713"},"modified":"2024-07-13T07:57:52","modified_gmt":"2024-07-13T12:57:52","slug":"fly-me-to-the-moon-points-to-the-past-and-future-of-moonshot-marketing","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=785713","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;Fly Me to the Moon&#8217; Points to the Past and Future of Moonshot Marketing"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>In a new movie titled\u00a0\u201cFly Me to the Moon,\u201d\u00a0a marketing consultant played by Scarlett Johansson uses Tang breakfast drink, Crest toothpaste and Omega watches to give a publicity boost to NASA\u2019s Apollo moon program.<\/p>\n<p>The marketing consultant may be totally fictional. And don\u2019t get me started on the\u00a0fake moon landing\u00a0that\u2019s part of the screwball comedy\u2019s plot. But the fact that the makers of\u00a0Tang,\u00a0Crest\u00a0and\u00a0Omega\u00a0allied themselves with NASA\u2019s brand in the 1960s is totally real.<\/p>\n<p>More than 50 years later, those companies are still benefiting from the NASA connection, says\u00a0Richard Jurek, a marketing and public relations executive in the Chicago area who\u2019s one of the authors of\u00a0\u201cMarketing the Moon: The Selling of the Apollo Lunar Program.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In the latest episode of the\u00a0Fiction Science podcast, Jurek says Tang sold poorly when it was introduced in the late 1950s. \u201cBut once it was announced that it was being used in the space program and marketed that way, it became a huge bestseller for them, and in fact, still sells more overseas \u2014 and is a multibillion-dollar brand today,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n<p><iframe style=\"border-radius:12px\" src=\"https:\/\/open.spotify.com\/embed\/episode\/4julAbgwFxvNRdC1Y1Ya7y?utm_source=generator\" width=\"100%\" height=\"152\" frameborder=\"0\" allowfullscreen=\"\" allow=\"autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; fullscreen; picture-in-picture\" loading=\"lazy\"><\/iframe><br \/>\n<span id=\"more-167746\"\/><\/p>\n<p>NASA also got something out of the arrangements: The easy-to-use Tang powder was well-suited for the astronauts to mix with water during their flights. The Crest team helped NASA come up with a type of toothpaste that astronauts could swallow rather than spit. And Omega made one heck of a chronograph\u00a0for the astronauts.<\/p>\n<p>But Jurek says the marketing campaign\u2019s main players were contractors like Boeing, Martin Marietta and North American Rockwell. Those contractors, rather than NASA itself, gave the biggest commercial push to the Apollo program.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThere was a war going on,\u201d he explains. \u201cThere were a lot of missile manufacturers who didn\u2019t want to come home and talk to their families about, \u2018Yeah, we built another missile that was being used in the war.\u2019 But through the marketing of Apollo and marketing of what they were doing for NASA, they could come home and talk about, \u2018Look, we\u2019re helping Neil Armstrong, we\u2019re helping NASA, we\u2019re helping America get to the moon.\u2019 And that was a feel-good message.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>NASA and its commercial partners rode a tsunami-scale wave of enthusiasm in the buildup to the first moon landing in 1969. But in the wake of the life-and-death drama that surrounded the crippled Apollo 13 mission in 1970, that wave quickly crashed. \u201cIt shifted from an adventure story and a geopolitical story into one that really was a geology story, about rocks and the formation of the Earth, and it became a much harder sell,\u201d Jurek says.<\/p>\n<p>Jurek says that could serve as a cautionary tale for future crewed missions to the moon, like the ones that NASA is planning for the latter half of the 2020s as part of its Artemis campaign (which is named after the twin sister of Apollo in Greek mythology).<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<p>\n<span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Flying Billboard Scene | FLY ME TO THE MOON (2024) Movie CLIP HD\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/dHqk9ynA36E?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/figure>\n<p>\u201cThere\u2019s a lot of enthusiasm for space travel,\u201d he says. \u201cYou see it in the SpaceX launches, and some of the gimmicks of whether you fly a Tesla into space \u2014 and you have all these GoPros around and everybody\u2019s oohing and ahhing over the images. But then it becomes a very real thing when you ask somebody to actually pay for it, and pay for it with their tax dollars.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>For taxpayers who may be tempted to turn from oohing to booing, the lesson of the Apollo era is that many of the space program\u2019s benefits are indirect and pay dividends over the course of decades.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re benefiting from the Apollo program today, from those fundamental investments that were made in basic research and science and infrastructure \u2026 back in the \u201960s and \u201970s,\u201d Jurek says. The advances in microcircuitry and satellite technology required for the Apollo program made it possible for Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk to create multibillion-dollar businesses, he says.<\/p>\n<p>And what can NASA learn? Jurek says the space agency is\u00a0doing a good job of adapting to a media marketplace that\u2019s more \u201ctribe-focused and niche-focused\u201d than it was during the Apollo era, due to the rise of the internet and social media. But he adds that NASA\u2019s efforts to engage with the public \u201ccould maybe gain a lot more from having a bit more of that private-enterprise management of digital marketing, elevated beyond just social media.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"alignright size-full\"><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Richard Jurek is chief marketing and communication officer and executive vice president of The Inland Real Estate Group, and the co-author of \u201cMarketing the Moon.\u201d<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Jurek also gives a thumbs-up to the way NASA lets its astronauts build their own brands through social media. He says the space agency could take that a step further \u2014 perhaps by following the precedent that was set in the early 1960s, when the\u00a0Mercury astronauts struck a deal with Life magazine for their personal stories.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhat the movie got right \u2014 and what NASA got right in the 1950s and 1960s \u2014 was turning the astronauts into the face of the program,\u201d he says.. \u201cBy doing so, they personalized the missions, and gave people a personal connection to the astronauts in which they felt like they had a stake in their success.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Could there be, for example, a Netflix documentary series about the next generation of spacefliers? Oh, wait \u2026\u00a0there\u2019s already been such a series, focusing on the privately funded Inspiration4 orbital mission.<\/p>\n<p>Jurek says the rise of private-sector space missions could dramatically change the space marketing game over the next five to 10 years.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cYou\u2019ll have a lot more commercialization, a lot more individual managing of brands and messaging. Sponsorships, if you will, of missions, and private contractors elevating their brands,\u201d he says. \u201cBut I think the bigger question will be the cooperation between the various private organizations and the government entities who in many ways control and regulate access to things. For example, it\u2019s illegal to own a moon rock from the Apollo program. It\u2019s government property.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>If private astronauts start extracting resources from the moon \u2014 or if other countries such as China, Russia or India do the same \u2014 who decides who gets what? What if China beats the U.S. in the space marketing game<a\/>?<\/p>\n<p>\u201cHow is the access and the engagement internationally in space going to change?\u201d Jurek says. \u201cThat, I think, is a bigger question over whether or not\u00a0Taco Bell\u00a0or\u00a0Pizza Hut\u00a0sponsors a particular spaceflight to go back to the moon.\u201d<\/p>\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n<p><em>Take a look at the\u00a0original version of this posting on Cosmic Log\u00a0for links to additional resources on moonshot marketing, plus a roundup of fun facts and celebrity cameos to look for in \u201cFly Me to the Moon.\u201d For what it\u2019s worth, next week brings the 55th anniversary of the Apollo 11 moon landing.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em>Stay tuned for future episodes of the\u00a0Fiction Science podcast\u00a0via\u00a0Apple,\u00a0Spotify,\u00a0Player.fm,\u00a0Pocket Casts and Podchaser. If you like Fiction Science, please rate the podcast and subscribe to get alerts for future episodes.<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-167746-669279d0b63ae\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/?ver=13.2#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=167746&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-167746-669279d0b63ae&amp;n=1\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-167746-669279d0b63ae\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/167746\/fly-me-to-the-moon-points-to-the-past-and-future-of-moonshot-marketing\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a new movie titled\u00a0\u201cFly Me to the Moon,\u201d\u00a0a marketing consultant played by Scarlett Johansson uses Tang breakfast drink, Crest toothpaste and Omega watches to give a publicity boost to&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":785714,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-785713","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/785713","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=785713"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/785713\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/785714"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=785713"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=785713"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=785713"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}