{"id":786642,"date":"2024-07-31T13:10:59","date_gmt":"2024-07-31T18:10:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=786642"},"modified":"2024-07-31T13:10:59","modified_gmt":"2024-07-31T18:10:59","slug":"astronomers-uncover-new-details-in-the-brightest-gamma-ray-burst-ever-detected","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=786642","title":{"rendered":"Astronomers Uncover New Details in the Brightest Gamma Ray Burst Ever Detected"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>In October 2022, the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope and the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory detected an extraordinarily powerful Gamma Ray Burst (GRB). It still stands as the Brightest Of All Time (BOAT), and astronomers have been curious about it ever since. <\/p>\n<p>New research has uncovered more details in the burst. What do they tell us about these forceful explosions?<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-167943\"\/><\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-pullquote\">\n<blockquote>\n<p>\u201cWhen I first saw that signal, it gave me goosebumps.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><cite>Maria Edvige Ravasio, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands <\/cite><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/figure>\n<p>GRBs are the most powerful energetic events in the Universe, second only to the Big Bang. They\u2019re brief yet powerful explosions that can release as much energy in a few seconds as the Sun will release in its billions of years of fusion. Astronomers don\u2019t completely understand the mechanism behind them. They seem to come from the explosion of an extremely massive star or the merger of two extremely dense objects like neutron stars or black holes. <\/p>\n<p>A GRB\u2019s initial burst is called the prompt emission. While the prompt emissions themselves last anywhere from milliseconds to several hundred seconds, GRBs have afterglows that are much longer-lived and emitted in wavelengths longer than gamma rays: X-ray, ultraviolet, optical, infrared, microwave, and radio emissions. This means that astronomers can still study their source long after the gamma rays have disappeared. <\/p>\n<p>When BOAT, aka GRB 221009A, was discovered, it was so powerful that it saturated Fermi\u2019s detectors. That means astronomers weren\u2019t able to observe some of the GRB\u2019s most energetic moments. <\/p>\n<p>In new research published in Science, astronomers say they\u2019ve found another peak in GRB 221009A\u2019s prompt emissions data. The research is \u201cA mega\u2013electron volt emission line in the spectrum of a gamma-ray burst.\u201d The lead author is Maria Edvige Ravasio, a Post-doctoral Researcher in Astrophysics at Radboud University in Nijmegen, Netherlands. This peak is a new clue about what happens during a GRB.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe physics of the prompt emission is poorly understood: The dominant form of energy in the relativistic jet is unknown, as is the nature of the radiative process responsible for producing the observed photons,\u201d the authors write in their paper. <\/p>\n<p>In their new research, the team used observations of the GRB and combined them with statistical models to identify new features. They divided the GRB into different time intervals and analyzed them separately and together. They focused on the parts of the prompt emission that weren\u2019t the brightest. \u201cWe investigated the less bright portions of the prompt emission,\u201d they write, and they avoided the portion of the signal that was saturated by the GRB\u2019s extraordinary power. <\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">This figure from the research shows some of the analysis. The horizontal axis shows the time since the GBM. GBM is the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor, an instrument on the Fermi Space Telescope that\u2019s triggered by GRBs. The vertical axis shows the count rate, the blue line is the GRB\u2019s light curve, and the numbered segments are the thirteen time intervals the researchers worked with. The grey area labelled BTI stands for Bad Timing Interval, excluded because the detector was saturated by the BOAT\u2019s overwhelming energy. Image Credit: Ravasio et al. 2024. <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>\u201cA few minutes after the BOAT erupted, Fermi\u2019s Gamma-ray Burst Monitor recorded an unusual energy peak that caught our attention,\u201d said Ravasio. \u201cWhen I first saw that signal, it gave me goosebumps. Our analysis since then shows it to be the first high-confidence emission line ever seen in 50 years of studying GRBs.\u201d A high-confidence emission line is a specific wavelength of light that\u2019s unlikely to be noise. Like everything else about GRBs, the line was transient. It only lasted 40 seconds, but it\u2019s still significant. It occurred about five minutes after the initial burst and peaked at 12 MeV (million electron volts). To put that into context, the light our eyes can sense, called visible light, ranges from only two to three eV. <\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"676\" height=\"283\" src=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/post-GRB-peak.png\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-167974\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/post-GRB-peak.png 676w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/post-GRB-peak-580x243.png 580w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/post-GRB-peak-250x105.png 250w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 676px) 100vw, 676px\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">This figure from the research shows some of the results. The left panel is for the 290 to 295-second interval, and the right panel is for the 300 to 320-second interval. These panels are dense with information, but the main takeaway is the peak shown with black dotted lines in both panels. \u201cWe find that the spectra at times 280 to 320 s after the GBM trigger contain a narrow emission feature at ~10 MeV,\u201d the authors write. They used different models and methods to understand the data. SBPL stands for \u201csmoothly-broken power law,\u201d and Gaussian is another data handling method. Image Credit: Ravasio et al. 2024. <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The newfound emission line is significant because of what happens to the energy emitted by GRBs. When powerful electromagnetic radiation collides with matter, it can be absorbed and then re-emitted at lower wavelengths. Depending on conditions, some wavelengths of light will be more prominent than others. Astronomers examine the light spectroscopically, and depending on the light that\u2019s prominent or obscured, they can learn a lot about the chemistry of the matter that\u2019s emitting the light. Some of the features in the spectrum can also reveal particle processes that are occurring. One of those processes is the annihilation of matter and anti-matter.<\/p>\n<p>When astronomers studied the absorption and emission spectra from GRBs in the past, they couldn\u2019t be certain that what they were seeing wasn\u2019t noise. But this time, it\u2019s different.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-pullquote\">\n<blockquote>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019ve determined that the odds this feature is just a noise fluctuation are less than one chance in half a billion.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><cite>Om Sharan Salafiam co-author, INAF-Brera Observatory in Milan, Italy<\/cite><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/figure>\n<p>\u201cWhile some previous studies have reported possible evidence for absorption and emission features in other GRBs, subsequent scrutiny revealed that all of these could just be statistical fluctuations. What we see in the BOAT is different,\u201d said coauthor Om Sharan Salafia at INAF-Brera Observatory in Milan, Italy. \u201cWe\u2019ve determined that the odds this feature is just a noise fluctuation are less than one chance in half a billion.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The researchers think that the emission line comes from gamma rays travelling at nearly the speed of light. Their most likely source is exotic: the annihilation of matter and anti-matter. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhen an electron and a positron collide, they annihilate, producing a pair of gamma rays with an energy of 0.511 MeV,\u201d said coauthor Gor Oganesyan at Gran Sasso Science Institute and Gran Sasso National Laboratory in L\u2019Aquila, Italy. \u201cBecause we\u2019re looking into the jet, where matter is moving at near light speed, this emission becomes greatly blueshifted and pushed toward much higher energies.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>For the observed peak to reach the 12 MeV level, the electrons and positrons had to be moving at 99.9 % of the speed of light: 299,492,665 meters per second. <\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"883\" height=\"493\" src=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Gamma-ray-burst-GOAT.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-167969\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Gamma-ray-burst-GOAT.jpg 883w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Gamma-ray-burst-GOAT-580x324.jpg 580w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Gamma-ray-burst-GOAT-250x140.jpg 250w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/07\/Gamma-ray-burst-GOAT-768x429.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 89vw, (max-width: 1000px) 54vw, (max-width: 1071px) 543px, 580px\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">This artist\u2019s illustration shows a jet of particles moving at nearly light speed emerging from a massive star. When the star ran out of fuel, it collapsed into a black hole. The black hole\u2019s powerful gravity drew nearby matter toward it, and some of the matter was redirected into dual jets firing in opposite directions. We see a gamma-ray burst when one of these jets happens to point directly at Earth. Image Credit: NASA\u2019s Goddard Space Flight Center Conceptual Image Lab<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>This emission line is a new window into the world of powerful GRBs. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cAfter decades of studying these incredible cosmic explosions, we still don\u2019t understand the details of how these jets work,\u201d said Elizabeth Hays, the Fermi project scientist at\u00a0NASA\u2019s Goddard Space Flight Center. \u201cFinding clues like this remarkable emission line will help scientists investigate this extreme environment more deeply.\u201d\u00a0<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<p>\n<span class=\"embed-youtube\" style=\"text-align:center; display: block;\"><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"NASA&#039;s Fermi Finds Novel Feature in BOAT Gamma-Ray Burst\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/9hSf7UgeKvg?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/span>\n<\/p>\n<\/figure>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-167943-66aa7acf885e7\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/?ver=13.2#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=167943&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-167943-66aa7acf885e7&amp;n=1\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-167943-66aa7acf885e7\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/167943\/astronomers-uncover-new-details-in-the-brightest-gamma-ray-burst-ever-detected\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In October 2022, the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope and the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory detected an extraordinarily powerful Gamma Ray Burst (GRB). It still stands as the Brightest Of All&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":786643,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-786642","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/786642","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=786642"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/786642\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/786643"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=786642"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=786642"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=786642"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}