{"id":787635,"date":"2024-08-22T07:31:50","date_gmt":"2024-08-22T12:31:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=787635"},"modified":"2024-08-22T07:31:50","modified_gmt":"2024-08-22T12:31:50","slug":"dinosaur-killing-asteroid-came-from-beyond-jupiter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=787635","title":{"rendered":"Dinosaur-killing asteroid came from beyond Jupiter"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<figure id=\"attachment_484192\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-484192\" style=\"width: 800px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-484192\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">View larger. | Artist\u2019s concept of the massive asteroid impact that wiped out the dinosaurs some 66 million years ago. New evidence shows the dinosaur-killing asteroid was a C-type (carbonaceous) asteroid \u2013 that is, a variety of asteroid made of carbon, rocks and metals \u2013 that came from beyond Jupiter. Image via Pixabay (Public domain).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>A massive asteroid impact killed off the dinosaurs<\/strong> about 66 million years ago. It happened in what is now the Gulf of Mexico and created a huge crater.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Where did the asteroid come from?<\/strong> A new study says it originated in the outer solar system past Jupiter and contained a large amount of carbon.<\/li>\n<li><strong>It wasn\u2019t a comet<\/strong> that wiped out the dinosaurs, the study says, refuting previous theories.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Dinosaur-killing asteroid from beyond Jupiter<\/h3>\n<p>About 66 million years ago, an asteroid struck Earth and caused the extinction of the dinosaurs. It appears to have created the Chicxulub crater buried beneath the Yucat\u00e1n Peninsula in Mexico. Since at least 1990, when scientists found the Chicxulub crater and identified it as an asteroid impact site, many have debated about what kind of asteroid it was. And now an international team of scientists says it has pinpointed the Chicxulub impactor\u2019s origin and composition. The researchers reported on August 16, 2024, that it was a carbonaceous, or C-type, asteroid (containing rocks, metals and lots of carbon). They said the asteroid came this way <em>from beyond Jupiter<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>The research team, led by Mario Fischer-G\u00f6dde at the University of Cologne in Germany, published its peer-reviewed study in the journal <em>Science<\/em> on August 15, 2024.<\/p>\n<h3>Chicxulub, the dinosaur-killing asteroid<\/h3>\n<p>The Chicxulub asteroid is estimated to have been about 6 miles (10 km) in diameter. It struck Earth in what\u2019s now the Gulf of Mexico, 66 million years ago. Scientists have said it was a key cause, if indeed not <em>the<\/em> cause, of the extinction of the dinosaurs. Scientists call the strike Cretaceous-Paleogene extinction event. As the paper said:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The geologic boundary between the Cretaceous and Paleogene eras 66 million years ago is marked by worldwide deposits from an impact at modern Chicxulub, Mexico. The impact coincides with a mass extinction that wiped out non-avian dinosaurs and many other species.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The impact supposedly created a huge crater, known today as the Chicxulub crater. It is about 120 miles (195 km) across and 12 miles (20 km) deep.<\/p>\n<p>Why do scientists think an asteroid created this crater? For one thing, they found high levels of platinum-group elements (PGEs) such as iridium, ruthenium, osmium, rhodium, platinum and palladium in the K-Pg boundary layers. This is a geological signature, usually a thin band of rock containing much more iridium than other bands. These elements are rare on Earth, but they\u2019re common in meteorites, or rocks from space. What\u2019s more, similarly elevated PGE levels were also found globally. This finding suggests the impact spread debris around the world.<\/p>\n<p>Previous to this finding, some scientists had interpreted these rare elements at the K-Pg boundary as evidence of volcanic activity. But many scientists believe the specific PGE ratios are more consistent with those from meteorite impacts.<\/p>\n<p>Yet, even with this data, scientists still haven\u2019t been sure exactly what kind of asteroid Chicxulub was, or where it came from.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_484196\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-484196\" style=\"width: 650px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/earthsky.org\/upl\/2024\/08\/Chicxulub-impact-crater-diagram-February-2000.jpg\" alt=\"2 rectangular maps, one above the other, showing brown terrain surrounded by blue areas and black text labels.\" width=\"650\" height=\"726\" class=\"size-full wp-image-484196\" srcset=\"https:\/\/earthsky.org\/upl\/2024\/08\/Chicxulub-impact-crater-diagram-February-2000.jpg 650w, https:\/\/earthsky.org\/upl\/2024\/08\/Chicxulub-impact-crater-diagram-February-2000-269x300.jpg 269w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 650px) 100vw, 650px\"\/><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-484196\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Today, the Chicxulub crater is buried beneath the Yucat\u00e1n Peninsula in Mexico, with the center just offshore. Imaging from NASA\u2019s Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (STS-99) revealed part of the diameter ring of the crater in the form of a shallow circular trough. Numerous cenotes (sinkholes) cluster around the trough marking the inner crater rim. Image via  David Fuchs\/ Wikimedia Commons\/ NASA\/ JPL-Caltech (Public domain).<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<h3>A carbonaceous asteroid from beyond Jupiter<\/h3>\n<p>Most asteroids lie in the asteroid belt between Mars and Jupiter. Was the asteroid belt the origin of the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs? Fischer-G\u00f6dde said:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>We wanted to identify the origin of this impactor.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Fischer-G\u00f6dde and his colleagues studied the evaluated ruthenium (Ru) isotopes in samples taken from the K-Pg boundary. Then, they compared those to samples from five other asteroid impacts within the last 541 million years, samples from ancient Archean (3.5 \u2013 3.2 billion-years-old) impact-related spherule layers and samples from two carbonaceous meteorites.<\/p>\n<p>The results showed that the ruthenium isotope signatures were uniform and closely matched those of carbonaceous chondrite meteorites, not other meteorite types or Earth itself. Also, the asteroid was most likely a C-type, or carbonaceous, the most common kind of asteroid. As the name suggests, they are rich in carbon. In addition, the asteroid also likely originated in the outer solar system, out past Jupiter.<\/p>\n<p>Fischer-G\u00f6dde said:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The asteroid\u2019s composition is consistent with that of carbonaceous asteroids that formed outside of Jupiter\u2019s orbit during the formation of the solar system.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The ancient Archean samples supported these conclusions as well. The samples from the other five asteroid impacts, however, came from S-type (salicaceous) asteroids that originated from the inner solar system.<\/p>\n<h3>Not a comet<\/h3>\n<p>Also, the findings rule out the impactor being a comet instead of an asteroid, as some scientists had also postulated. As William Bottke, a planetary scientist at the Southwest Research Institute in Boulder, Colorado, noted:<\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>The idea it was a comet goes back far into the literature. Sizeable carbonaceous asteroids are much more probable to hit the Earth than comets.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Fischer-G\u00f6dde also said the ruthenium-isotope data do not match a comet.<\/p>\n<p>The Chicxulub impact was a rare event, but changed the course of evolution on Earth. Co-author Carsten M\u00fcnker at the University of Cologne added: <\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p>We found that the impact of an asteroid like the one at Chicxulub is a very rare and unique event in geological time. The fate of the dinosaurs and many other species was sealed by this projectile from the outer reaches of the solar system.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>Bottom line: An international team of scientists has determined that Chicxulub dinosaur-killing asteroid was carbonaceous and originated from the deep outer solar system.<\/p>\n<p>Source: Ruthenium isotopes show the Chicxulub impactor was a carbonaceous-type asteroid<\/p>\n<p>Via:<\/p>\n<p>University of Cologne<\/p>\n<p>Nature<\/p>\n<p>American Association For the Advancement of Science (EurekAlert!)<\/p>\n<p>Read more: Asteroid dust in Chicxulub crater seals deal on dino extinction<\/p>\n<p>Read more: Ancient life signs under dinosaur-killing Chicxulub crater<\/p>\n<p><span class=\"cp-load-after-post\"\/><\/div>\n<div>\n<div class=\"post-author\">\n<h4>Paul Scott Anderson<\/h4>\n<p>                    View Articles\n                  <\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"post-tags\">\n<h6 data-udy-fe=\"text_7c58270d\">About the Author:<\/h6>\n<p>Paul Scott Anderson has had a passion for space exploration that began when he was a child when he watched Carl Sagan\u2019s Cosmos. While in school he was known for his passion for space exploration and astronomy. He started his blog The Meridiani Journal in 2005, which was a chronicle of planetary exploration. In 2015, the blog was renamed as Planetaria. While interested in all aspects of space exploration, his primary passion is planetary science. In 2011, he started writing about space on a freelance basis, and now currently writes for AmericaSpace and Futurism (part of Vocal). He has also written for Universe Today and SpaceFlight Insider, and has also been published in The Mars Quarterly and has done supplementary writing for the well-known iOS app Exoplanet for iPhone and iPad.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/earthsky.org\/space\/dinosaur-killing-asteroid-chicxulub-carbonaceous-asteroid-jupiter\/?rand=772280\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>View larger. | Artist\u2019s concept of the massive asteroid impact that wiped out the dinosaurs some 66 million years ago. New evidence shows the dinosaur-killing asteroid was a C-type (carbonaceous)&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":787636,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[46],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-787635","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-earth-sky"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/787635","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=787635"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/787635\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/787636"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=787635"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=787635"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=787635"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}