{"id":787763,"date":"2024-08-23T16:56:02","date_gmt":"2024-08-23T21:56:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=787763"},"modified":"2024-08-23T16:56:02","modified_gmt":"2024-08-23T21:56:02","slug":"the-k7ra-solar-update-42","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=787763","title":{"rendered":"The K7RA Solar Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">08\/23\/2024<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<span>Ten new sunspot groups appeared over this reporting week (August 15-21), but both solar flux and sunspot numbers were lower, due to the extraordinary numbers in the previous week. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Average daily sunspot number declined from 255 to 180.3, while average daily solar flux went from 284.9 to 232.7. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Geomagnetic numbers were quieter. Average daily planetary A index declined from 28.6 to 11.9, and average daily middle latitude numbers sank from 17.8 to 12. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>On August 17 the planetary A index was 31, caused by a CME around 1400 UTC. A strong G3 geomagnetic storm was the result. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>One new sunspot group appeared on August 15, and two more emerged on every day from August 16 to 19, and one more on August 21. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Predicted solar flux is 230 and 235 on August 23-24, then 240 on August 25-26, 230 on August 27, 235 on August 28-29, 205, 210 and 215 on August 30 through September 1, 220 on September 2-3, 225 on September 4-6, 220 on September 7, 225 on September 9, 230 on September 10-12, and 225 on September 13-16, 215 and 210 on September 17-18, 200 on September 19-20, then 205, 210, 205 and 200 on September 21-24, and 205 on September 25-26. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>The planetary A index prediction shows 8 on August 23, and 5 on August 24 to September 17, 18 and 12 on September 18-19, then 5 on September 20 through the first week in October. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>I get mail asking why ten meters isn&#8217;t open during all of the recent high solar activity. The reason is the season. We have to be much closer to the autumnal equinox to see ten meters open regularly. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s Ionosphere for August 22, 2024 from OK1HH. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>&#8220;After the solar flare X1.1 on 14 August, accompanied by a CME, we expected a geomagnetic storm. A more accurate prediction was provided by the NASA model &#8211; the disturbance in agreement with it started on 17 August around 1400 UT. The geomagnetic storm was strong (G3), probably triggered by the arrival of more than one CME. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>We observe two to three sunspot groups on the solar disk that can produce moderate flares (they have a &#8216;beta-gamma&#8217; magnetic field). There are usually 10 &#8211; 12 groups in total. Coronal holes are few and relatively small, which reduces the likelihood of an increase in solar wind speed. Semi-regularly, days with higher MUF values (until Aug 17, Aug 19 and Aug 21) alternated with decreases (Aug 14, Aug 18, Aug 20&#8230;), which could only be predicted to a very limited extent and only for shorter intervals based on measured interplanetary magnetic field variations. But these are mostly impossible to predict.&#8221; <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Solar activity has remained at a 20-year high for most of this summer, and so far there is no indication of a possible decline. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>20 year record:  .<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Kepler. Thanks to David Moore for this: <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span> <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Send your tips, reports, observations, questions and comments to k7ra@arrl.net . When reporting observations, don&#8217;t forget to tell us which mode you were operating. <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>For more information concerning shortwave radio propagation, see  and the ARRL Technical Information Service web page at,  . <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>For an explanation of numbers used in this bulletin, see <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span> . <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>An archive of past propagation bulletins is at <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span> <span>\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>More good information and tutorials on propagation are at <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span> .<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Also, check this. Understanding Solar Indices from September 2002 QST:  <\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Instructions for starting or ending email subscriptions to<span> <\/span>ARRL bulletins are at  <span>\u00a0<\/span><\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>Sunspot numbers for August 15 through 21 2024 were 164, 169, 170, 170, 213, 200, and 176, with a mean of 180.3. 10.7 cm flux was 227.4, 224.9, 229.5, 231, 239.1, 238.2, and 239, with a mean of 232.7. Estimated planetary A indices were 6, 8, 31, 13, 10, 7, and 8, with a mean of 11.9. Middle latitude A Index was 6, 11, 24, 15, 11, 9, and 8, with a mean of 12. <\/span><\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-k7ra-solar-update-842?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>08\/23\/2024 \u00a0Ten new sunspot groups appeared over this reporting week (August 15-21), but both solar flux and sunspot numbers were lower, due to the extraordinary numbers in the previous week.&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-787763","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/787763","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=787763"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/787763\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=787763"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=787763"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=787763"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}