{"id":788518,"date":"2024-09-06T10:21:51","date_gmt":"2024-09-06T15:21:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=788518"},"modified":"2024-09-06T10:21:51","modified_gmt":"2024-09-06T15:21:51","slug":"the-k7ra-solar-update-44","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=788518","title":{"rendered":"The K7RA Solar Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">09\/06\/2024<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Eight new sunspot groups emerged over the past week.<\/p>\n<p>Two appeared on August 30, three more on August 31, another two on<br \/>September 2 and one more on September 4.<\/p>\n<p>Average daily sunspot number declined from 177.1 to 155.3, while<br \/>average daily solar flux barely changed from 229 to 230.3.<\/p>\n<p>Spaceweather.com reported the average daily sunspot number for<br \/>August was 200, the highest monthly average in the past two decades.<\/p>\n<p>Reader David Moore sent in this link about the same thing:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/4cQHwdD<\/p>\n<p>Predicted solar flux is 235 on September 6, 225 on September 7-8,<br \/>230 on September 9-13, then 250, 255 and 245 on September 14-16,<br \/>then 240, 235, 240, and 245 on September 17-20, 240 on September<br \/>21-22, 245 on September 23-24, then 240, 235, 230 and 225 on<br \/>September 25-28, then 230, 240, 245, and 250 on September 29 through<br \/>October 2, then 240 on October 3-4, and 245 on October 5-6, 240<br \/>again on October 7-10, then 250 and 255 on October 11-12.<\/p>\n<p>Predicted planetary A index is 10 on September 6,and 5 on September<br \/>7, 10 on September 8-9, 8 on September 10-11, 5 on September 12-16,<br \/>8 on September 17-18, 5 on September 19-25, and 25 on September<br \/>26-27, then 15 and 8 on September 28-29, and 5 on September 30<br \/>through October 4, 10 on October 5, and 5 on October 6-13.<\/p>\n<p>Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>Ionosphere &#8211; September 5, 2024 from OK1HH:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;September 6th was the sixth day of a continuous influx of<br \/>solar-origin protons into the Earth&#8217;s atmosphere. The likely source<br \/>is on the far side of the Sun, probably in AR3792, possibly AR3796.<br \/>This influx briefly intensified on 3 September at noon UTC.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Overall solar activity remains high. The solar flux is again close<br \/>to the values measured on August 6-13, about 27 days ago, or during<br \/>the last solar revolution. Summer in the Earth&#8217;s northern hemisphere<br \/>is slowly coming to an end and shortwave propagation conditions<br \/>should improve on average. This is happening, but at a slower and<br \/>more erratic pace. The reason for this is the irregular changes in<br \/>the activity of the Earth&#8217;s magnetic field and the parameters of the<br \/>solar wind. Sometimes the changes are even opposite to what we would<br \/>expect &#8211; for example, on 4 September between 1000 to 1500 UTC there<br \/>was a rather significant and unexpected increase in geomagnetic<br \/>activity, without any major changes in MUF and overall propagation<br \/>conditions.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We are now observing only a single small coronal hole on the Sun<br \/>now. It is located near the central meridian and there is no active<br \/>region nearby. Respectively, all three larger ARs, capable of<br \/>producing eruptions of moderate magnitude, are south of the solar<br \/>equator. Accordingly, we find no change in the short-term forecasts<br \/>from the current state. More optimistic are the medium-term<br \/>forecasts, which take into account seasonal changes.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The &#8220;Solar-Terrestrial Centre of Excellence&#8221; Newsletter:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/www.stce.be\/newsletter\/pdf\/2024\/STCEnews20240905.pdf<\/p>\n<p>Latest from Dr. Tamitha Skov, WX6SWW:<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Storms Die Down but New Regions Pop Up | Space Weather Spotlight 01 September 2024\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/S07qt59PcWI?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>Send your tips, reports, observations, questions and comments to<br \/>k7ra@arrl.net. When reporting observations, don&#8217;t forget to tell us<br \/>which mode you were operating.<\/p>\n<p>For more information concerning shortwave radio propagation, see<br \/> and the ARRL Technical Information<br \/>Service web page at,  . For<br \/>an explanation of numbers used in this bulletin, see<br \/> .<\/p>\n<p>An archive of past propagation bulletins is at<br \/> . More good<br \/>information and tutorials on propagation are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Also, check this article:<\/p>\n<p> &#8220;<em>Understanding Solar Indices<\/em>&#8221; from September<br \/>2002 <em>QST<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Instructions for starting or ending email subscriptions to\u00a0 ARRL<br \/>bulletins are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Sunspot numbers for August 29 through September 4 2024 were 124,<br \/>143, 180, 156, 200, 133, and 151, with a mean of 155.3. 10.7 cm flux<br \/>was 204, 214.2, 232.6, 231.6, 225.5, 242.1, and 261.8, with a mean<br \/>of 230.3. Estimated planetary A indices were 5, 23, 26, 16, 8, 7,<br \/>and 13, with a mean of 14. Middle latitude A Index was 5, 16, 19,<br \/>16, 7, 10, and 16, with a mean of 12.7.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-k7ra-solar-update-844?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>09\/06\/2024 Eight new sunspot groups emerged over the past week. Two appeared on August 30, three more on August 31, another two onSeptember 2 and one more on September 4.&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-788518","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/788518","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=788518"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/788518\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=788518"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=788518"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=788518"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}