{"id":789506,"date":"2024-09-24T16:48:52","date_gmt":"2024-09-24T21:48:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=789506"},"modified":"2024-09-24T16:48:52","modified_gmt":"2024-09-24T21:48:52","slug":"how-a-nearby-supernova-left-its-mark-on-earth-life","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=789506","title":{"rendered":"How a Nearby Supernova Left its Mark on Earth Life"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>When a massive star explodes as a supernova, it does more than release an extraordinary amount of energy. Supernovae explosions are responsible for creating some of the heavy elements, including iron, which is blasted out into space by the explosion. On Earth, there are two accumulations of the iron isotope Fe60 in sea-floor sediments that scientists trace back about two or three million years ago and about five to six million years ago. <\/p>\n<p>The explosions that created the iron also dosed Earth with cosmic radiation.<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-168687\"\/><\/p>\n<p>In new research submitted to the Astrophysical Journal Letters, scientists examine how much energy reached Earth from these explosions and how that radiation may have affected life on Earth. The paper is titled \u201cLife in the Bubble: How a nearby supernova left ephemeral footprints on the cosmic-ray spectrum and indelible imprints on life.\u201d The lead author is Caitlyn Nojiri from UC Santa Cruz. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cLife on Earth is constantly evolving under continuous exposure to ionizing radiation from both terrestrial and cosmic origin,\u201d the authors write. Terrestrial radiation slowly decreases over billions of years. But not cosmic radiation. The amount of cosmic radiation that Earth is exposed to varies as our Solar System moves through the galaxy. \u201cNearby supernova (SN) activity has the potential to raise the radiation levels at the surface of the Earth by several orders of magnitude, which is expected to have a profound impact on the evolution of life,\u201d they write.<\/p>\n<p>The authors explain that the two million-year-old accumulation is directly from a supernova explosion, and the older accumulation is from when Earth passed through a bubble. <\/p>\n<p>The bubble in the study\u2019s title comes from a particular type of star called OB stars. OB stars are massive, hot, and short-lived stars that usually form in groups. These stars emit powerful outflowing winds that create \u201cbubbles\u201d of hot gas in the interstellar medium. Our Solar System is inside one of these bubbles, called the Local Bubble, which is almost 1,000 light-years wide and was created several million years ago.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">An artist\u2019s conception of the hot local bubble. Image Credit: NASA<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The Earth entered the Local Bubble about five or six million years ago, which explains the older Fe60 accumulation. According to the authors, the younger Fe60 accumulation from two or three million years ago is directly from a supernova. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt is likely that the 60Fe peak at about 2-3 Myr originated from a supernova occurring in the Upper Centaurus Lupus association in Scorpius Centaurus (~140 pc) or the Tucana Horologium association (~70 pc). Whereas the ~ 5-6 Myr peak is likely attributed to the Solar System\u2019s entrance into the bubble,\u201d the authors write. <\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"352\" src=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Local-Bubble-and-SN-1024x352.png\" alt=\"The left panel shows the Local Bubble and nearby stellar associations, while the right panel shows their galactic coordinates. The right panel also shows a new Galactic bubble discovered in 2018. It's likely the remnant of an SN that exploded in Upper Centaurus Lupus. Image Credit: Nojiri et al. 2024. \" class=\"wp-image-168698\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Local-Bubble-and-SN-1024x352.png 1024w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Local-Bubble-and-SN-580x199.png 580w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Local-Bubble-and-SN-250x86.png 250w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Local-Bubble-and-SN-768x264.png 768w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/Local-Bubble-and-SN.png 1226w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 89vw, (max-width: 1000px) 54vw, (max-width: 1071px) 543px, 580px\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">The left panel shows the Local Bubble and nearby stellar associations, while the right panel shows their galactic coordinates. The right panel also shows a new Galactic bubble discovered in 2018. It\u2019s likely the remnant of an SN that exploded in Upper Centaurus Lupus. Image Credit: Nojiri et al. 2024. <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The Local Bubble is not a quiet place. It took multiple supernovae to create it. The authors write that it took 15 SN explosions over the last 15 million years to create the LB. \u201cWe know from the reconstruction of the LB history that at least 9 SN exploded during the past 6 Myrs,\u201d they write. <\/p>\n<p>The researchers took all the data and calculated the amount of radiation from multiple SNe in the LB. \u201cIt is not clear what would the biological effects of such radiation doses be,\u201d they write, but they do discuss some possibilities. <\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"566\" height=\"468\" src=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/SN-radiation-dose.png\" alt=\"This figure shows the average dose rate experienced at ground level as a function of the distance to the nearby SN. The average dose is calculated over the first 10 kyr (solid line) and over the first 100 kyr (dashed line) after the SN explosion. It's not enough to trigger an extinction, but could've driven species diversification. Image Credit: Nojiri et al. 2024.\" class=\"wp-image-168699\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/SN-radiation-dose.png 566w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/09\/SN-radiation-dose-250x207.png 250w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 566px) 100vw, 566px\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">This figure shows the average dose rate experienced at ground level as a function of the distance to the nearby SN. The average dose is calculated over the first 10 kyr (solid line) and over the first 100 kyr (dashed line) after the SN explosion. It\u2019s not enough to trigger an extinction, but it could\u2019ve driven species diversification. Image Credit: Nojiri et al. 2024.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The radiation dosage may have been strong enough to create double-strand breaks in DNA. This is severe damage and can lead to chromosomal changes and even cell death. But there are other effects in terms of the development of life on Earth. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cDouble-strand breaks in DNA can potentially lead to mutations and jump in the diversification of species,\u201d the researchers write. A 2024 paper showed that \u201cthe rate of virus diversification in the African Tanganyika lake accelerated 2-3 Myr ago.\u201d Could this be connected to SN radiation? <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt would be appealing to better understand whether this can be attributed to the increase in cosmic-radiation dose we predict to have taking place during that period,\u201d the authors tease. <\/p>\n<p>The SN radiation wasn\u2019t powerful enough to trigger an extinction. But it could\u2019ve been powerful enough to trigger more mutations, which could lead to more species diversification. <\/p>\n<p>Radiation is always part of the environment. It rises and falls as events unfold and as Earth moves through the galaxy. Somehow, it must be part of the equation that created the diversity of life on our planet. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt is, therefore, certain that cosmic radiation is a key environmental factor when assessing the viability and evolution of life on Earth, and the key question pertains to the threshold for radiation to be a favourable or harmful trigger when considering the evolution of species,\u201d the authors write in their conclusion. <\/p>\n<p>Unfortunately, we don\u2019t clearly understand exactly how radiation affects biology, what thresholds might be in place, and how they might change over time. \u201cThe exact threshold can only be established with a clear understanding of the biological effects of cosmic radiation (especially muons that dominate at ground level), which remains highly unexplored,\u201d Nojiri and her co-authors write. <\/p>\n<p>The study shows that, whether we can see it in everyday life or not, or even if we\u2019re aware of it or not, our space environment exerts a powerful force on Earth\u2019s life. SN radiation could\u2019ve influenced the mutation rate at critical times during Earth\u2019s history, helping shape evolution. <\/p>\n<p>Without supernova explosions, life on Earth could look very different. Many things had to go just right for us to be here. Maybe in the distant past, supernova explosions played a role in the evolutionary chain that leads to us. <\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-168687-66f33345a628a\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/?ver=13.2#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=168687&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-168687-66f33345a628a&amp;n=1\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-168687-66f33345a628a\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/168687\/how-a-nearby-supernova-left-its-mark-on-earth-life\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When a massive star explodes as a supernova, it does more than release an extraordinary amount of energy. Supernovae explosions are responsible for creating some of the heavy elements, including&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":789507,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-789506","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/789506","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=789506"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/789506\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/789507"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=789506"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=789506"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=789506"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}