{"id":789607,"date":"2024-09-26T08:34:51","date_gmt":"2024-09-26T13:34:51","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=789607"},"modified":"2024-09-26T08:34:51","modified_gmt":"2024-09-26T13:34:51","slug":"dark-matter-could-a-have-slight-interaction-with-regular-matter","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=789607","title":{"rendered":"Dark Matter Could a Have Slight Interaction With Regular Matter"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>The reason we call dark matter dark isn\u2019t because it\u2019s some shadowy material. It\u2019s because dark matter doesn\u2019t interact with light. The difference is subtle, but important. Regular matter can be dark because it absorbs light. It\u2019s why, for example, we can see the shadow of molecular clouds against the scattered stars of the Milky Way. This is possible because light and matter have a way to connect. Light is an electromagnetic wave, and atoms contain electrically charged electrons and protons, so matter can emit, absorb and scatter light. Dark matter isn\u2019t electrically charged. It has no way to connect with light, and so when light and dark matter meet up they simply pass through each other.<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-168717\"\/><\/p>\n<p>All of our observations suggest that dark matter and light only have gravity in common. When dark matter is clustered around a galaxy, for example, its gravitational tug can deflect light. Because of this we can map the distribution of dark matter in the Universe by observing how light is gravitationally lensed around it. We also know that dark and regular matter interact gravitationally. The tug of dark matter causes galaxies to gather together into superclusters. But an unanswered question is whether dark and regular matter <em>only<\/em> interact gravitationally. If an atom and dark matter particle intersected, would they really just pass through each other?<\/p>\n<p>Since we haven\u2019t directly observed dark matter particles we can only speculate, but most dark matter models argue that gravity is the only common link with light and regular matter. Dark and regular matter clump around each other, but they don\u2019t collide and merge like interstellar clouds. But a new study suggests the two <em>do<\/em> interact, which could reveal subtle aspects of the mysterious stuff.<\/p>\n<p>The study looks at six ultrafaint dwarf galaxies, or UFDs. They are satellite galaxies near the Milky Way that seem to have far fewer stars than their mass would suggest. This is because they are mostly made of dark matter. If regular and dark matter only interact gravitationally, then the distribution of stars in these small galaxies should follow a certain pattern. If dark and regular matter interact directly, then this distribution will be skewed.<\/p>\n<p>To test this the team ran computer simulations of both scenarios. They found that in the non-interacting model the distribution of stars should become more dense in the center of the UFDs and more diffuse at the edges. In the interacting model the stellar distribution should be more uniform. When they compared these models with observations of the six galaxies, they found the interacting model was a slightly better fit.<\/p>\n<p>So it seems dark and regular matter interact in ways beyond their gravitational tugs. There isn\u2019t enough data to pin down the exact nature of the interaction, but the fact there is any interaction at all is a surprise. It means that our traditional models of dark matter are at least partly wrong. It may also point the way toward new methods of detecting dark matter directly. In time we may finally solve the mystery of this dark, but not entirely invisible, material.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Reference:<\/strong> Almeida, Jorge S\u00e1nchez, Ignacio Trujillo, and Angel R. Plastino. \u201cThe Stellar Distribution in Ultrafaint Dwarf Galaxies Suggests Deviations from the Collisionless Cold Dark Matter Paradigm.\u201d <em>The Astrophysical Journal Letters<\/em> 973.1 (2024): L15.<\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-168717-66f560bc38421\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/?ver=13.2#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=168717&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-168717-66f560bc38421&amp;n=1\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-168717-66f560bc38421\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/168717\/dark-matter-could-a-have-slight-interaction-with-regular-matter\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The reason we call dark matter dark isn\u2019t because it\u2019s some shadowy material. It\u2019s because dark matter doesn\u2019t interact with light. The difference is subtle, but important. Regular matter can&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":789608,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-789607","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/789607","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=789607"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/789607\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/789608"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=789607"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=789607"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=789607"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}