{"id":791251,"date":"2024-11-18T12:36:00","date_gmt":"2024-11-18T17:36:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=791251"},"modified":"2024-11-18T12:36:00","modified_gmt":"2024-11-18T17:36:00","slug":"the-new-mars-landing-approach-how-well-land-large-payloads-on-the-red-planet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=791251","title":{"rendered":"The New Mars Landing Approach: How We&#8217;ll Land Large Payloads on the Red Planet"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>Back in 2007, I talked with Rob Manning, engineer extraordinaire at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and he told me something shocking. Even though he had successfully led the entry, descent, and landing (EDL) teams for three Mars rover missions, he said the prospect of landing a human mission on the Red Planet might be impossible.<\/p>\n<p>But now, after nearly 20 years of work and research \u2014 as well as more successful Mars rover landings \u2014 Manning says the outlook has vastly improved.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019ve made huge progress since 2007,\u201d Manning told me when we chatted a few weeks ago in 2024. \u201cIt\u2019s interesting how its evolved, but the fundamental challenges we had in 2007 haven\u2019t gone away, they\u2019ve just morphed.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-169697\"\/><\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Image of the Martian atmosphere and surface obtained by the Viking 1 orbiter in June 1976. (Credit: NASA\/Viking 1)<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The problems arise from the combination of Mars\u2019 ultra-thin atmosphere\u2014which is over 100 times thinner than Earth\u2019s \u2014 and the ultra-large size of spacecraft needed for human missions, likely between 20 \u2013 100 metric tons.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cMany people immediately conclude that landing humans on Mars should be easy,\u201d Manning said back in 2007, \u201csince we\u2019ve landed successfully on the Moon and we routinely land human-carrying vehicles from space to Earth. And since Mars falls between the Earth and the Moon in size and in the amount of atmosphere, then the middle ground of Mars should be easy.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>But Mars\u2019 atmosphere provides challenges not found on Earth or the Moon. A large, heavy spacecraft \u00a0streaking through Mars\u2019 thin, volatile atmosphere only has just a few minutes to slow from incoming interplanetary speeds (for example, the Perseverance rover was traveling 12,100 mph [19,500 kph] when it reached Mars) to under Mach 1, and then quickly transition to a lander to slow to be able to touch down gently.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<p>\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"The Incredible Challenge of Landing Heavy Payloads On Mars\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/MZD5nnScDks?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n<\/p><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Universe Today publisher Fraser Cain\u2019s video about the challenges of landing Mars, with more details in this article. <\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>In 2007, the prevailing notion among EDL engineers was that there\u2019s too little atmosphere to land like we do on Earth, but there is actually too much atmosphere on Mars to land heavy vehicles like we do on the Moon by using propulsive technology alone.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe call it the Supersonic Transition Problem,\u201d said Manning, again in 2007. \u201cUnique to Mars, there is a velocity-altitude gap below Mach 5. The gap is between the delivery capability of large entry systems at Mars and the capability of super-and sub-sonic decelerator technologies to get below the speed of sound.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The largest payload to land on Mars so far is the Perseverance rover, which has a mass of about 1 metric ton. Successfully landing Perseverance and its predecessor Curiosity required a complicated, Rube Goldberg-like series of maneuvers and devices such as the Sky Crane. Larger, human-rated vehicles will be coming in even faster and heavier, making them incredibly difficult to slow down.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"724\" height=\"500\" src=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Rob-Manning_mob.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-169698\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Rob-Manning_mob.jpg 724w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Rob-Manning_mob-580x401.jpg 580w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/11\/Rob-Manning_mob-250x173.jpg 250w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 724px) 100vw, 724px\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Rob Manning, Chief Engineer for NASA\u2019s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and the Sky Crane for landing rovers on Mars. Credit: NASA\/JPL-Caltech\/Keck Institute<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>\u201cSo, how do you slow down to subsonic speeds,\u201d Manning said now in 2024 as the chief engineer at JPL, \u201cto get to speeds where traditionally we know how to fire our engines to enable touchdown? We thought bigger parachutes or supersonic decelerators like LOFTID (Low-Earth Orbit Flight Test of an Inflatable Decelerator) tested by NASA) would allow us to maybe slow down better, but there were still issues with both those devices.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBut there was one trick we didn\u2019t know anything about it,\u201d Manning continued. \u201cHow about using your propulsion system and firing the engines backwards \u2014retro propulsion \u2014 while you are flying at supersonic speeds to shed velocity? Back in 2007, we didn\u2019t know the answer to that. We didn\u2019t even think it was possible.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Why not? What could go wrong?<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWhen you fire engines backwards as you are moving through an atmosphere, there\u2019s a shock front that forms and it would be moving around,\u201d Manning explained, \u201cso it could come along and whack the vehicle and cause it to go unstable or cause damage. You\u2019re also flying right into the plume of the rocket engine exhaust, so there could be extra friction and heating possibilities on the vehicle.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>All of this is very hard to model and there was virtually no experience doing it, as in 2007, no one had ever used propulsive technology alone to slow and then land a spacecraft back on Earth. This is mostly because our planet\u2019s beautiful, luxuriously thick atmosphere slows a spacecraft down easily, especially with a parachute or creative flying as the space shuttle did.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cPeople did study it a bit, and we came to the conclusion it would be great to try it and find out whether we could fire engines backwards and see what happens,\u201d Manning mused, adding that there wasn\u2019t any extra funding laying around to launch a rocket just to watch it come down again to see what happened.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"576\" src=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/CRS-16-SpaceX-Falcon-9-on-Pad-1024x576.jpg\" alt=\"CRS-16\" class=\"wp-image-142071\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/CRS-16-SpaceX-Falcon-9-on-Pad-1024x576.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/CRS-16-SpaceX-Falcon-9-on-Pad-250x141.jpg 250w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/CRS-16-SpaceX-Falcon-9-on-Pad-580x326.jpg 580w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/CRS-16-SpaceX-Falcon-9-on-Pad-768x432.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/04\/CRS-16-SpaceX-Falcon-9-on-Pad.jpg 1280w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 89vw, (max-width: 1000px) 54vw, (max-width: 1071px) 543px, 580px\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>A SpaceX Falcon-9 rocket poised to launch Dragon from Cape Canaveral. Credit: NASA  <\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>But then, SpaceX started doing tests in attempt to land their Falcon 9\u2019s first stage booster back on Earth to re-use them.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSpaceX said they were going to try it,\u201d Manning said, \u201cAnd to do that they needed to slow the booster down in the supersonic phase while in Earth\u2019s upper atmosphere. So, there\u2019s a portion of the flight where they fire their engines backwards at supersonic speeds through a rarified atmosphere which is very much what\u2019s like at Mars.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>As you can imagine, this was incredibly intriguing to EDL engineers thinking about future Mars missions.<\/p>\n<p>After a few years of trial, error, and failures, on September 29, 2013, SpaceX performed the first supersonic retropropulsion (SRP) maneuver to decelerate the reentry of the first stage of their Falcon 9 rocket. While it ultimately hit the ocean and was destroyed, the SRP actually worked to slow down the booster.<\/p>\n<p>NASA asked if their EDL engineers could watch and study SpaceX\u2019s data, and SpaceX readily agreed. Beginning in 2014, NASA and SpaceX formed a three-year public-private partnership centered on SRP data analysis called the NASA Propulsive Descent Technology (PDT) project.\u00a0 The F9 boosters were outfitted with special instruments to collect data specifically on portions of the entry burn which fell within the range of Mach numbers and dynamic pressures expected at Mars. Additionally, there were visual and infrared imagery campaigns, flight reconstruction, and fluid dynamics analysis \u2013 all of which helped both NASA and SpaceX.<\/p>\n<p>To everyone\u2019s surprise and delight, it worked. On December 21, 2015, an F9 first stage returned and successfully landed on Landing Zone 1 at Cape Canaveral, the first-ever orbital class rocket landing. This was a game changing demonstration of SRP, which advanced the knowledge and tested the technology of using SRP on Mars.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1023\" height=\"682\" src=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/CWzUJbpUkAEBOtD.jpg-large.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-124025\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/CWzUJbpUkAEBOtD.jpg-large.jpg 1023w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/CWzUJbpUkAEBOtD.jpg-large-250x167.jpg 250w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/CWzUJbpUkAEBOtD.jpg-large-580x387.jpg 580w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/12\/CWzUJbpUkAEBOtD.jpg-large-768x512.jpg 768w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 89vw, (max-width: 1000px) 54vw, (max-width: 1071px) 543px, 580px\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>View of SpaceX Falcon 9 first stage approaching Landing Zone 1 on Dec. 21, 2015. Credit: SpaceX<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>\u201cBased on the analyses completed, the remaining SRP challenge is characterized as one of prudent flight systems engineering dependent on maturation of specific Mars flight systems, not technology advancement,\u201d wrote an EDL team, detailing the results of the PDT project in a paper. In short, SpaceX\u2019s success meant it wouldn\u2019t require any fancy new technology or breaking the laws of physics to land large payloads on Mars.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt turns out, we learned some <em>new<\/em> physics,\u201d Manning said. They found that the shock front \u2018bubble\u2019 created around the vehicle by firing the engines somehow insulates the spacecraft from any buffeting, as well as from some of the heating.<\/p>\n<p>EDL engineers now believe that SRP is the only Mars entry, descent and landing technology that is intrinsically scalable across a wide range and size of missions to shed enough velocity during atmospheric flight to enable safe landings. Alongside aerobraking, this is one of the leading means of landing heavy equipment, habitats and even humans on Mars.<\/p>\n<p>But still, numerous issues remain unsolved when it comes to landing a human mission on Mars. Manning mentioned there are multiple unknowns, including how a big ship such as SpaceX\u2019s Starship would be steered and flown through Mars\u2019 atmosphere; can fins be used hypersonically or will the plasma thermal environment melt them? The amount of debris kicked up by large engines on human-sized ship could be fatal, especially for the engines you\u2019d like to reuse for returning to orbit or to Earth, so how do you protect the engines and the ship? Mars can be quite windy, so what happens if you encounter wind shears or a dust storm during landing? What kind of landing legs will work for a large ship on Mars\u2019 rocky surface? Then there are logistics problems such as how will all the infrastructure get established? How will ships be refueled to return home?<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is all going to take a lot of time, more time than people realize,\u201d Manning said. \u201cOne of the downsides of going to Mars is that it is hard to do trial and error unless you are very patient. The next time you can try again is 26 months later because of the timing of the launch windows between our two planets. Holy buckets, what a pain that is going to be! But I think we\u2019re going to learn a lot whenever we can try it for the first time.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>And at least the supersonic retropropulsion question has been answered.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe\u2019re basically doing what Buck Rogers told us to do back in the 1930s: fire your engines backwards while you\u2019re going really fast.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><strong>2007 article:<\/strong> The Mars Landing Approach: Getting Large Payloads to the Surface of the Red Planet<\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-169697-673b7909dd721\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/?ver=14.0#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=169697&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-169697-673b7909dd721&amp;n=1\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-169697-673b7909dd721\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/169697\/the-new-mars-landing-approach-how-well-land-large-payloads-on-the-red-planet\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Back in 2007, I talked with Rob Manning, engineer extraordinaire at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, and he told me something shocking. Even though he had successfully led the entry, descent,&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":791252,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-791251","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/791251","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=791251"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/791251\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/791252"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=791251"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=791251"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=791251"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}