{"id":792335,"date":"2024-12-31T19:10:14","date_gmt":"2025-01-01T00:10:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=792335"},"modified":"2024-12-31T19:10:14","modified_gmt":"2025-01-01T00:10:14","slug":"a-young-exoplanets-atmosphere-doesnt-match-its-birthplace","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=792335","title":{"rendered":"A Young Exoplanet&#8217;s Atmosphere Doesn&#8217;t Match its Birthplace"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>If the modern age of astronomy could be summarized in a few words, it would probably be \u201cthe age of shifting paradigms.\u201d Thanks to next-generation telescopes, instruments, and machine learning, astronomers are conducting deeper investigations into cosmological mysteries, making discoveries, and shattering preconceived notions. This includes how systems of planets form around new stars, which scientists have traditionally explained using the Nebular Hypothesis. This theory states that star systems form from clouds of gas and dust (nebulae) that experience gravitational collapse, creating a new star.<\/p>\n<p>The remaining gas and dust then settle into a protoplanetary disk around the new star, which gradually coalesces to create planets. Naturally, astronomers theorize that the composition of the planets would match that of the disk itself. However, when examining a still-developing exoplanet in a distant star system, a team of astronomers uncovered a mismatch between the gases in the planet\u2019s atmosphere and those within the disk. These findings indicate that the relationship between a protoplanetary disk and the planets they form might be more complicated.<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-170236\"\/><\/p>\n<p>The team was led by Postdoctoral Associate Chih-Chun \u201cDino\u201d Hsu from the Center for Interdisciplinary Exploration and Research in Astrophysics (CIERA) at Northwestern University. He and his colleagues were joined by researchers from the California Institute of Technology (Caltech), the University of California San Diego (UCSD), and the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA). The paper that details their findings, \u201cPDS 70b Shows Stellar-like Carbon-to-oxygen Ratio,\u201d recently appeared in <em>The Astrophysical Journal Letters<\/em>.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>The W.M. Keck Observatory at the summit of Mauna Kea, Hawaii. Credit: MKO<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>For their study, the team relied on the Keck Planet Imager and Characterizer (KPIC), a new instrument at the W.M. Keck Observatory, to obtain spectra from PDS 70b. This still-forming exoplanet orbits a young variable star (only ~5 million years old) located about 366 light-years from Earth. It is the only one known to astronomers with protoplanets residing in the cavity of the circumstellar disk from which they formed, making it ideal for studying exoplanet formation and evolution in their natal environment. Jason Wang, an assistant professor of physics and astronomy at Northwestern who advised Hsu, explained in a Northwestern News press release:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>\u201cThis is a system where we see both planets still forming as well as the materials from which they formed. Previous studies have analyzed this disk of gas to understand its composition. For the first time, we were able to measure the composition of the still-forming planet itself and see how similar the materials are in the planet compared to the materials in the disk.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Until recently, astronomers were unable to study a protoplanetary disk directly to track the birth of new planets. By the time most exoplanets are observable to telescopes, they have finished forming, and their natal disks have since disappeared. These observations are historic in that this is the first time scientists have compared information from an exoplanet, its natal disk, and its host star. Their work was made possible by new photonics technologies co-developed by Wang for the Keck telescopes. <\/p>\n<p>This technology allowed Hsu and his team to capture the spectra of PDS 70b and the faint features of this young planetary system, despite the presence of a much brighter star. \u201cThese new tools make it possible to take really detailed spectra of faint objects next to really bright objects,\u201d said Wang. \u201cBecause the challenge here is there\u2019s a really faint planet next to a really bright star. It\u2019s hard to isolate the light of the planet in order to analyze its atmosphere.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>The resulting spectra revealed the presence of carbon monoxide and water in PDS 70b\u2019s atmosphere. This allowed the team to calculate the inferred ratio of atmospheric carbon and oxygen, which they compared to previously reported measurements of gases in the disk. \u201cWe initially expected the carbon-to-oxygen ratio in the planet might be similar to the disk,\u201d said Hsu. \u201cBut, instead, we found the carbon, relative to oxygen, in the planet was much lower than the ratio in the disk. That was a bit surprising, and it shows that our widely accepted picture of planet formation was too simplified.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/eso1436f-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-163130\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/eso1436f-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/eso1436f-580x387.jpg 580w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/eso1436f-250x167.jpg 250w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/eso1436f-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/eso1436f-1536x1024.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/09\/eso1436f-2048x1366.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 89vw, (max-width: 1000px) 54vw, (max-width: 1071px) 543px, 580px\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\"><em>Artist<\/em>\u2018s<em> depiction of a protoplanetary disk in which planets are forming. Credit: ESO\/L. Cal\u00e7ada<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>To explain this discrepancy, the team proposed two possible explanations. These include the possibility that the planet might have formed before its disk became enriched in carbon or that the planet might have grown mostly by absorbing large amounts of solid materials in addition to gases. While the spectra show only gases, the team acknowledges that some of the carbon and oxygen could have accreted from solids trapped in ice and dust. Said Hsu:<\/p>\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p>\u201cFor observational astrophysicists, one widely accepted picture of planet formation was likely too simplified. According to that simplified picture, the ratio of carbon and oxygen gases in a planet\u2019s atmosphere should match the ratio of carbon and oxygen gases in its natal disk \u2014 assuming the planet accretes materials through gases in its disk. Instead, we found a planet with a carbon and oxygen ratio that is much lower compared to its disk. Now, we can confirm suspicions that the picture of planet formation was too simplified.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p>\u201cIf the planet preferentially absorbed ice and dust, then that ice and dust would have evaporated before going into the planet,\u201d added Wang. \u201cSo, it might be telling us that we can\u2019t just compare gas versus gas. The solid components might be making a big difference in the carbon-to-oxygen ratio.\u201d To explore these theories further, the team plans to obtain spectra from the other PDS 70c, the other fledging exoplanet in the system. \u201cBy studying these two planets together, we can understand the system\u2019s formation history even better,\u201d Hsu said. \u201cBut, also, this is just one system. Ideally, we need to identify more of them to better understand how planets form.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><em>Further Reading: Northwestern Now, The Astrophysical Journal Letters<\/em><\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-170236-67748664aa3d9\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/?ver=14.0#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=170236&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-170236-67748664aa3d9&amp;n=1\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-170236-67748664aa3d9\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/170236\/a-young-exoplanets-atmosphere-doesnt-match-its-birthplace\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>If the modern age of astronomy could be summarized in a few words, it would probably be \u201cthe age of shifting paradigms.\u201d Thanks to next-generation telescopes, instruments, and machine learning,&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":792336,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-792335","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/792335","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=792335"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/792335\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/792336"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=792335"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=792335"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=792335"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}