{"id":792397,"date":"2025-01-03T14:03:03","date_gmt":"2025-01-03T19:03:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=792397"},"modified":"2025-01-03T14:03:03","modified_gmt":"2025-01-03T19:03:03","slug":"the-k7ra-solar-update-59","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=792397","title":{"rendered":"The K7RA Solar Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">01\/03\/2025<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Currently a geomagnetic storm is raging. On January 1-2, Alaska&#8217;s<br \/>college A index reached 113.<\/p>\n<p>Predicted planetary A index is 12 on January 3, then 18, 18, 12, 10<br \/>and 8 on January 4-8, 5 on January 9-10, 10 and 8 on January 11-12,<br \/>5 on January 13-15, 12 on January 16, 10 on January 17-20, 5 on<br \/>January 21-25, then 8, 50, 20 and 8 January 26-29.<\/p>\n<p>Predicted solar flux is 215 on January 3-4, then 205, 210, 205 and<br \/>205 on January 5-8, then 200, 170 and 165 on January 9-11, 170 on<br \/>January 12-13, 175 on January 14-15, 180, 190, 200, 210 and 220 on<br \/>January 16-20, 230 on January 21-25, 240 on January 26-27, then 220,<br \/>200 and 195 on January 28-30.<\/p>\n<p>Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>Ionosphere &#8211; January 2, 2025, from OK1HH:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Considering the high solar flare activity, there was a relatively<br \/>high probability of an increase in geomagnetic activity during the<br \/>Christmas holidays.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;But currents of enhanced solar wind avoided the Earth and therefore<br \/>it was surprisingly quiet for a relatively long period from<br \/>Christmas almost until the end of the year, more precisely from 25<br \/>to 30 December.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Strong solar flares in the last two days of December were followed<br \/>by CMEs that were at least partially directed towards the Earth.<br \/>This prompted all geomagnetic field activity forecasters to jointly<br \/>and indiscriminately predict the occurrence of geomagnetic<br \/>disturbances and auroras for 31 December and 1 January.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Particles ejected by the second of the major eruptions hit the<br \/>Earth more effectively. Therefore, the geomagnetic disturbance on 31<br \/>December was weaker. The major disturbance on January 1, 2025 was<br \/>accompanied by beautiful auroras.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;At first approximation, the unexpected development of ionospheric<br \/>shortwave propagation on New Year&#8217;s Day may have seemed surprising.<br \/>Not only were they not bad, but their development was irregular,<br \/>while the MUF values were even above average. The cause can be found<br \/>also in the previous calm development (25 to 30 December) and also<br \/>in the fact that the solar wind speed started to increase gradually<br \/>only from 1 January.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The most active regions on the Sun now fall behind the western limb<br \/>of the solar disk. Therefore, solar activity will slowly decrease.<br \/>But it will be sufficient to open all shortwave bands. At the same<br \/>time, the Earth&#8217;s magnetic field activity will also be decreasing,<br \/>so the evolution of ionospheric propagation conditions should be<br \/>more stable, while remain mostly above average on most days.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>An article from &#8220;yourweather.co.uk&#8221; regarding the solar max:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/41ZnwUq<\/p>\n<p>Latest video from Dr. Tamitha Skov, WX6SWW (Space Weather Woman):<\/p>\n<p><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Solar Storms Hit for New Years with X-Flare Fireworks | Space Weather Spotlight 31 December 2024\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/k3gxVE74Xa0?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>For more information concerning shortwave radio propagation, see<br \/> and the ARRL Technical Information<br \/>Service web page at,  For<br \/>an explanation of numbers used in this bulletin, see<br \/> .<\/p>\n<p>An archive of past propagation bulletins is at,<br \/> . More good<br \/>information and tutorials on propagation are at  .<\/p>\n<p>Also, check this:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Rc8Njt<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<em>Understanding Solar Indices<\/em>&#8221; from September 2002 <em>QST<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Instructions for starting or ending email subscriptions to ARRL<br \/>bulletins are at,  .<\/p>\n<p>Sunspot numbers for December 26, 2024 through January 1, 2025 were<br \/>211, 233, 213, 209, 162, 172, and 163 with a mean of 194.7. 10.7 cm<br \/>flux was 255.8, 258.5, 260.3, 254.7, 223.5, 216.2, and 219.2 with a<br \/>mean of 241.2. Planetary A index was 3, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10 and 86 with<br \/>an average of 16.9. Middle latitude A Index was 3, 5, 7, 10, 7, 10,<br \/>and 48, with a mean of 12.9.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-k7ra-solar-update-860?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>01\/03\/2025 Currently a geomagnetic storm is raging. On January 1-2, Alaska&#8217;scollege A index reached 113. Predicted planetary A index is 12 on January 3, then 18, 18, 12, 10and 8&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-792397","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/792397","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=792397"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/792397\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=792397"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=792397"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=792397"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}