A spacecraft takes between about seven and nine months to reach Mars. The time depends on the spacecraft and the distance between the two planets, which changes as they follow their orbits around the Sun. NASA\u2019s Perseverance is the most recent spacecraft to make the journey, and it took about seven months.<\/p>\n
If it didn\u2019t take so long, then Mars would be within reach of a human mission sooner rather than later. NASA is exploring the idea of using nuclear electric propulsion to shorten the travel time.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n Sending a crewed mission to Mars is much more complicated than sending a robotic explorer like Perseverance. Perseverance will be left there after its mission ends. But humans need to return to Earth. One of the main restrictions is launch windows. These occur every 26 months when the planets are closest to one another, making the trip shorter and more manageable. So, a crewed return mission to Mars could take about four years, depending on factors like the crew\u2019s time on the planet.<\/p>\n A more efficient propulsion system under development could transport a crew to Mars on a round-trip in only about two years, according to its proponents. Engineers at NASA\u2019s Langley Research Center are working on a nuclear electric propulsion system that could bring Mars within reach in these timeframes. These systems use a nuclear reactor to generate electricity, which is used to ionize or positively charge gaseous propellants and create thrust.<\/p>\n But there\u2019s a catch: it has to be assembled in space.<\/p>\n The system is called the Modular Assembled Radiators for Nuclear Electric Propulsion Vehicles, or MARVL. MARVL is connected to NASA\u2019s goal of developing a Mars Transit Vehicle, aka Deep Space Transport, in the next decade or by the late 2030s.<\/p>\n One of the system\u2019s components is its heat dissipation system. The system is an array about the size of a football field once deployed. The idea is to break the system up into separate components that can be robotically assembled in space.<\/p>\n \u201cBy doing that, we eliminate trying to fit the whole system into one rocket fairing,\u201d said Amanda Stark, a heat transfer engineer at NASA Langley and the principal investigator for MARVL. \u201cIn turn, that allows us to loosen up the design a little bit and really optimize it.\u201d<\/p>\n Folding the entire system up into a small enough payload to fit inside a rocket fairing isn\u2019t really an option. Engineers have successfully folded other spacecraft into nosecones and then deployed them after release. The JWST\u2019s mirror is probably the best example of that. But the JWST\u2019s primary mirror is only 6.5 meters (21 ft and 4 inches) across. That\u2019s far smaller than MARVL\u2019s heat dissipation system, and it was still an elaborate challenge. <\/p>\n Making the heat dissipation system modular and assembling it in space with robots opens up new possibilities. The components could be launched into space in any order and in any combination that makes sense.<\/p>\n Space robotics is advancing and will play a larger and larger role as the future unfolds. The entire idea is an engineering challenge, but one that\u2019s not that far out of reach. NASA\u2019s Langley Research Centre has been working on these types of problems for decades.<\/p>\n Langley is a huge complex covering more than 700 acres that employs thousands of engineers, technicians, and scientists. It has made pioneering contributions to flight and spaceflight. The Centre played an important role in the development of the Apollo Lunar Module and contributed to other endeavours like the Hubble Space Telescope and the Viking Mars Lander. Space technology and research is one of their primary focuses.<\/p>\n This is an opportunity to produce a vehicle from the ground up that is designed to be launched in pieces and assembled in space.<\/p>\n \u201cExisting vehicles have not previously considered in-space assembly during the design process, so we have the opportunity here to say, \u2018We\u2019re going to build this vehicle in space. How do we do it? And what does the vehicle look like if we do that?\u2019 I think it\u2019s going to expand what we think of when it comes to nuclear propulsion,\u201d said Julia Cline, a mentor for the project in NASA Langley\u2019s Research Directorate. Cline led the center\u2019s participation in the Nuclear Electric Propulsion tech maturation plan development as a precursor to MARVL.<\/p>\n The Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP) system wasn\u2019t the only one under consideration. NASA also considered the Nuclear Thermal Propulsion (NTP) system. They also considered a \u201cquad-wing\u201d design for the NEP system because it could be folded into the Space Launch System\u2019s payload fairing. However, that system required a larger surface area, and the deployment systems in that design were heavy and complicated. It also required more propellant.<\/p>\n The Bi-Wing design has several advantages over the Quad-Wing design. It can be launched piece by piece in commercial launch vehicles without the need for the SLS. The rocket payload fairing doesn\u2019t restrict the radiator size, and it avoids solar flux, which would inhibit cooling.<\/p>\n NASA gave the MARVL project team two years to develop the idea. By then, the team hopes to have a small-scale ground demonstration ready.<\/p>\n \u201cOne of our mentors remarked, \u2018This is why I wanted to work at NASA, for projects like this,’\u201d said Stark, \u201cwhich is awesome because I am so happy to be involved with it, and I feel the same way.\u201d<\/p>\n![\"This](\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/MARVL-NEP-Quad-Wing-1024x472.jpg\")
![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/MARVL-NEP-Bi-Wing-1024x494.jpg\")
Like this:<\/h3>\n