{"id":793018,"date":"2025-01-27T15:52:07","date_gmt":"2025-01-27T20:52:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=793018"},"modified":"2025-01-27T15:52:07","modified_gmt":"2025-01-27T20:52:07","slug":"dynamically-stable-large-space-structures-via-architected-metamaterials","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=793018","title":{"rendered":"Dynamically Stable Large Space Structures via Architected Metamaterials"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>Exoplanet exploration has taken off in recent years, with over 5500 being discovered so far. Some have even been in the habitable zones of their stars. Imaging one such potentially habitable exoplanet is the dream of many exoplanet hunters, however, technology has limited their ability to do that. In particular, one specific piece of technology needs to be improved before we can directly image an exoplanet in the habitable zone of another star \u2013 a starshade. Christine Gregg, a researcher at NASA Ames Research Center, hopes to contribute to the effort of developing one and has received a NASA Institute for Advanced Concepts (NIAC) grant as part of the 2025 cohort to work on a star shade that is based on a special type of metamaterial.<\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-170628\"\/><\/p>\n<p>To understand the goal of Dr. Gregg and her team, it\u2019s best first to understand what starshades do and what\u2019s holding them back from being deployed. A starshade is designed to float in tandem with a space telescope and block out the light from a specific star, allowing the telescope to capture light directly from the much-less bright planet that is orbiting the star. That light can contain information about its size, orbital period, and even its atmospheric composition that would otherwise be lost in the overwhelming brightness of the planet\u2019s star.<\/p>\n<p>The shape of a starshade, which traditionally looks like a flower petal, might seem counterintuitive at first \u2013 if you\u2019re trying to block a star\u2019s light, why not just make the shape circular? But starlight coming from far away can diffract around a simple circle structure. The petals are explicitly designed to stop that from happening and completely block out even diffracted light around the shape\u2019s edges.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<p>\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Interview: Dr. Markus Janson, Starshades for Ground Telescopes\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/PjVRp4HJsP0?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n<\/p><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Fraser interviews another Starshade expert \u2013 Dr. Markus Janson from Stockholm University<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>But it\u2019s not the shape that makes it hard to deploy\u2014it\u2019s its size. Starshades are typically designed to be hundreds of meters across. Therefore, they are impossible to fit inside a traditional rocket fairing fully assembled. What\u2019s more, they have to move along with the telescope\u2014if the telescope the starshade is meant to accompany is pointed at another star and redirected, the starshade has to move with it.<\/p>\n<p>The wrinkle is that the starshade is likely tens of thousands of kilometers from the telescope it is designed to assist. So, a slight change of a few degrees of inclination for the telescope would mean hundreds of thousands of kilometers of travel for its associated starshade. That kind of movement requires a lot of fuel, which is also costly due to the weight requirements of launching these objects so far away.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>No wonder a starshade has yet to be successfully deployed in space. Combining gigantic sizes that don\u2019t fit inside rocket fairings and massive amounts of fuel to relocate every time the telescope needs to look at a different star are significant strikes against the concept. However, if humanity wants to directly image an exoplanet in the habitable zone of another star, there is still no better way to do so.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<p>\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"NASA&#039;s Starshade Animation\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/zs1x_Lt23mo?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n<\/p><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">NASA animation of the deployment of a starshade<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Enter Dr Gregg\u2019s idea\u2014she proposes using metamaterials for her starshade, which is robotically constructed in orbit. Metamaterials have several advantages over existing proposed starshades (one of which, by Nobel Prize winner John Mather, is another NIAC recipient this year).\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>First, metamaterials are lighter. As with all things launched into space, being lighter means less cost \u2013 or, in this case, the ability to bring more fuel, allowing the starshade to operate longer than alternatives.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Second, the specific kinds of metamaterials she proposes to use are much less likely to break. As she mentioned to Fraser in an interview, \u201cThe more stiffness a material has, the less damping it has. It\u2019s just sort of a natural trade-off\u201d. So, if a starshade is made from traditional materials, it would either be stiff and rigid but prone to vibrational strain when moving between positions or being deployed, or it would be very flexible but would have difficulty holding its shape when it\u2019s supposed to.<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-16-9 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n<p>\n<iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Phononic Metamaterials, Mary Bastawrous (Short Version)\" width=\"1110\" height=\"624\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/w3bdmWeBV6A?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n<\/p><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">This video shows phononic materials in action.<br \/>Credit \u2013 aiM Program at Duke University YouTube Channel<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The metamaterial Dr. Gregg and her colleagues have proposed uses a type of material that both holds its structure well but also suppresses vibration by a unique use of a material called a phononic crystal. These were initially engineered to dissipate sound waves. This means that when used as a material in a starshade, it could dampen any feedback on the structure from things like micrometeoroid impacts, solar radiation, or even the process of deployment and assembly.<\/p>\n<p>Using robots to deploy the starshade is another focal point of Dr. Gregg\u2019s work, as she discusses with Fraser. Still, for this Phase I NIAC project, she is focusing on developing the model for starshade itself and selecting the appropriate material. As with all NIAC projects, she can apply for more funding in a Phase II round upon completion of her Phase I. If she receives it, humanity will be one step closer to seeing a giant floating petal in space \u2013 but one with very particular mechanical and structural properties.<\/p>\n<p>Learn More:<br \/>NASA \/ C. Gregg \u2013 Dynamically Stable Large Space Structures via Architected Metamaterials<br \/>UT \u2013 In Order to Reveal Planets Around Another star, a Starshade Needs to Fly 40,000 km Away from a Telescope, Aligned Within Only 1 Meter<br \/>UT \u2013 Starshade Prepares To Image New Earths<br \/>UT \u2013 To Take the Best Direct Images of Exoplanets With Space Telescopes, we\u2019re Going to Want Starshades<\/p>\n<p>Lead Image:<br \/>Artist concept highlighting the novel approach proposed by the 2025 NIAC awarded selection of the Dynamically Stable Large Space Structures via Architected Metamaterials concept. NASA\/Christine Gregg<\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-170628-6797ef29372d9\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/?ver=14.0#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=170628&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-170628-6797ef29372d9&amp;n=1\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-170628-6797ef29372d9\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/170628\/dynamically-stable-large-space-structures-via-architected-metamaterials\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Exoplanet exploration has taken off in recent years, with over 5500 being discovered so far. Some have even been in the habitable zones of their stars. Imaging one such potentially&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":793019,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-793018","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/793018","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=793018"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/793018\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/793019"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=793018"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=793018"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=793018"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}