{"id":793366,"date":"2025-02-05T16:25:06","date_gmt":"2025-02-05T21:25:06","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=793366"},"modified":"2025-02-05T16:25:06","modified_gmt":"2025-02-05T21:25:06","slug":"astronomers-find-the-largest-structure-in-the-universe-and-name-it-quipu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=793366","title":{"rendered":"Astronomers Find the Largest Structure in the Universe and Name it &#8220;Quipu&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p>Is it possible to understand the Universe without understanding the largest structures that reside in it? In principle, not likely. In practical terms? Definitely not. Extremely large objects can distort our understanding of the cosmos. <\/p>\n<p>Astronomers have found the largest structure in the Universe so far, named Quipu after an Incan measuring system. It contains a shocking 200 quadrillion solar masses. <\/p>\n<p><span id=\"more-170765\"\/><\/p>\n<p>Astronomy is an endeavour where extremely large numbers are a part of daily discourse. But even in astronomy, 200 quadrillion is a number so large it\u2019s rarely encountered. And if Quipu\u2019s extremely large mass doesn\u2019t garner attention, its size surely does. The object, called a superstructure, is more than 400 megaparsecs long. That\u2019s more than 1.3 billion light-years. <\/p>\n<p>A structure that large simply has to affect its surroundings, and understanding those effects is critical to understanding the cosmos. According to new research, studying Quipu and its brethren can help us understand how galaxies evolve, help us improve our cosmological models, and improve the accuracy of our cosmological measurements. <\/p>\n<p>The research<span style=\"box-sizing: border-box; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;\">, titled \u201cUnveiling the largest structures in the nearby Universe: Discovery of the Quipu superstructure,\u201d has been accepted for publication in the journal Astronomy and Astrophysics. Hans Bohringer from the Max Planck Institute is the lead author<\/span>. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cFor a precise determination of cosmological parameters, we need to understand the effects of the local large-scale structure of the Universe on the measurements,\u201d the authors write. \u201cThey include modifications of the cosmic microwave background, distortions of sky images by large-scale gravitational lensing, and the influence of large-scale streaming motions on measurements of the Hubble constant.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Superstructures are extremely large structures that contain groups of galaxy clusters and superclusters. They\u2019re so massive they challenge our understanding of how our Universe evolved. Some of them are so massive they break our models of cosmological evolution. <\/p>\n<p>Quipu is the largest structure we\u2019ve ever found in the Universe. It and the other four superstructures the researchers found contain 45% of the galaxy clusters, 30% of the galaxies, 25% of the matter, and<br \/>occupy a volume fraction of 13%. <\/p>\n<p>The image below helps explain why they named it Quipu. Quipu are recording devices made of knotted cords, where the knots contain information based on colour, order, and number. \u201cThis view gives the best impression of the superstructure as a long filament with small side filaments, which initiated the naming of Quipu,\u201d the authors explain in their paper. <\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">This figure from the new research is a wedge diagram in declination and distance of the Quipu superstructure. The distance is in units of Megaparsecs. The red dots show the superstructure members and the black lines show the friends-to-friends linking. The grey dots show the non-member clusters. The two dashed lines give the distances for redshifts of 0.03 and 0.06.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>In their work, Bohringer and his co-researchers found Quipu and four other superstructures within a distance range of 130 to 250 Mpc. They used X-ray galaxy clusters to identify and analyze the superstructures in their Cosmic Large-Scale Structure in X-rays (CLASSIX) Cluster Survey. X-ray galaxy clusters can contain thousands of galaxies and lots of very hot intracluster gas that emits X-rays. These emissions are the key to mapping the mass of the superstructures. X-rays trace the densest regions of matter concentration and the underlying cosmic web. The emissions are like signposts for identifying superstructures. <\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"603\" height=\"407\" src=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/superstructure-overdensity.png\" alt=\"This figure from the research shows galaxy distribution in density gradients. The density ratio to the average density is shown by six contour levels: 0 - 0.23 (black), 0.23 - 0.62 (dark blue), 0.62 - 1.13 (light blue), 1.13 - 1.9 (grey), 1.9 - 3.7 (olive), and &gt; 3.7 (white). The clusters of the five superstructures are overplotted with filled black circles. Image Credit: Bohringer et al. 2025. \" class=\"wp-image-170776\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/superstructure-overdensity.png 603w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/superstructure-overdensity-580x391.png 580w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/02\/superstructure-overdensity-250x169.png 250w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 603px) 100vw, 603px\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">This figure from the research shows galaxy distribution in density gradients. The density ratio to the average density is shown by six contour levels: 0 \u2013 0.23 (black), 0.23 \u2013 0.62 (dark blue), 0.62 \u2013 1.13 (light blue), 1.13 \u2013 1.9 (grey), 1.9 \u2013 3.7 (olive), and &gt; 3.7 (white). The clusters of the five superstructures are overplotted with filled black circles. Image Credit: Bohringer et al. 2025. <\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The authors point out that \u201cthe difference in the galaxy density around field clusters and members of superstructures is remarkable.\u201d This could be because field clusters are populated with less massive clusters than those in the superstructure rather than because the field clusters have lower galaxy density. <\/p>\n<p>Regardless of the reasons, the mass of these superstructures wields enormous influence on our attempt to observe, measure, and understand the cosmos. \u201cThese large structures leave their imprint on cosmological observations,\u201d the authors write. <\/p>\n<p>The superstructures leave an imprint on the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), which is relic radiation from the Big Bang and key evidence supporting it. The CMB\u2019s properties match our theoretical predictions with near-surgical precision. The superstructures\u2019 gravity alters the CMB as it passes through them according to the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe (ISW) effect, producing fluctuations in the CMB. These fluctuations are foreground artifacts that are difficult to filter out, introducing interference into our understanding of the CMB and, hence, the Big Bang. <\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"512\" src=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/wmap-1024x512.jpg\" alt=\"The full-sky image of the temperature fluctuations (shown as colour differences) in the cosmic microwave background is made from nine years of WMAP observations. These are the seeds of galaxies from a time when the universe was under 400,000 years old. Credit: NASA\/WMAP\" class=\"wp-image-161001\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/wmap-1024x512.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/wmap-580x290.jpg 580w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/wmap-250x125.jpg 250w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/wmap-768x384.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/wmap-1536x768.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/wmap-2048x1024.jpg 2048w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 767px) 89vw, (max-width: 1000px) 54vw, (max-width: 1071px) 543px, 580px\"\/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">The full-sky image of the temperature fluctuations (shown as colour differences) in the cosmic microwave background is made from nine years of WMAP observations. These are the seeds of galaxies from a time when the universe was under 400,000 years old. Credit: NASA\/WMAP<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The superstructures can also impact measurements of the Hubble constant, a fundamental value in cosmology that describes how fast the Universe is expanding. While galaxies are moving further apart due to expansion, they also have local velocities, called peculiar velocities or streaming motions. These need to be separated from expansion to understand expansion clearly. The great mass of these superstructures influences these streaming motions and distorts our measurements of the Hubble constant.   <\/p>\n<p>The research also notes that these massive structures can alter and distort our sky images through large-scale gravitational lensing. This can introduce errors in our measurements. <\/p>\n<p>On the other hand, simulations of the Lambda CDM produce superstructures like Quipu and the four others. Lambda CDM is our standard model of Big Bang cosmology and accounts for much of what we see in the Universe, like its large-scale structure. \u201cWe find superstructures with similar properties in simulations based on Lambda-CDM cosmology models,\u201d the authors write.  <\/p>\n<p>It\u2019s clear that these superstructures are critical to understanding the Universe. They hold a significant portion of its matter and affect their surroundings in fundamental ways. More research is needed to understand them and their influence.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cInteresting follow-up research on our findings includes, for example, studies of the influence of these environments on the galaxy population and evolution,\u201d the authors write in their conclusion. <\/p>\n<p>According to the study, these superstructures won\u2019t persist forever. \u201cIn the future cosmic evolution, these superstructures are bound to break up into several collapsing units. They are thus transient configurations,\u201d Bohringer and his co-researchers explain. <\/p>\n<p>\u201cBut at present, they are special physical entities with characteristic properties and special cosmic environments deserving special attention.\u201d<\/p>\n<div class=\"sharedaddy sd-block sd-like jetpack-likes-widget-wrapper jetpack-likes-widget-unloaded\" id=\"like-post-wrapper-24000880-170765-67a3d3e533ee7\" data-src=\"https:\/\/widgets.wp.com\/likes\/?ver=14.0#blog_id=24000880&amp;post_id=170765&amp;origin=www.universetoday.com&amp;obj_id=24000880-170765-67a3d3e533ee7&amp;n=1\" data-name=\"like-post-frame-24000880-170765-67a3d3e533ee7\" data-title=\"Like or Reblog\">\n<h3 class=\"sd-title\">Like this:<\/h3>\n<p><span class=\"button\"><span>Like<\/span><\/span> <span class=\"loading\">Loading&#8230;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span class=\"sd-text-color\"\/><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.universetoday.com\/170765\/astronomers-find-the-largest-structure-in-the-universe-and-name-it-quipu\/?rand=772204\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Is it possible to understand the Universe without understanding the largest structures that reside in it? In principle, not likely. In practical terms? Definitely not. Extremely large objects can distort&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":793367,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-793366","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-genaero"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/793366","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=793366"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/793366\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/793367"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=793366"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=793366"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=793366"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}