{"id":793992,"date":"2025-02-28T15:12:04","date_gmt":"2025-02-28T20:12:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=793992"},"modified":"2025-02-28T15:12:04","modified_gmt":"2025-02-28T20:12:04","slug":"the-arrl-solar-report-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=793992","title":{"rendered":"The ARRL Solar Report"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">02\/28\/2025<\/span><\/p>\n<p>A Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) associated with a filament eruption<br \/>became visible on February 26 at 1448 UTC.\u00a0 Model analysis<br \/>determined this CME to be a miss ahead of the Sun\/Earth line.<\/p>\n<p>Unsettled to active levels are likely on February 28 to March 1 as a<br \/>Coronal Hole influence continues, and a glancing blow is possible<br \/>from a Coronal Mass Ejection that occurred on February 25.<\/p>\n<p>Solar activity is forecast to range from low to moderate levels<br \/>through March 22.<\/p>\n<p>Minor to Moderate activity (R1 to R2) is possible at different<br \/>points throughout the period as active regions grow, evolve, and<br \/>return from the far-side of the Sun. There is a slight chance for R3<br \/>(Major) or greater events if any of the active regions develop<br \/>additional complex magnetic structures.<\/p>\n<p>Geomagnetic field activity is expected to be at quiet to unsettled<br \/>levels until March 6 with periodic, weak Coronal Hole influences.<br \/>Unsettled to active levels, with isolated G1 (Minor) storming<br \/>conditions are likely from March 7 to 18 as recurrent negative<br \/>polarity Coronal Holes are expected to be in a geoeffective<br \/>position.<\/p>\n<p>NOAA Space Weather forecasts a 55% chance of a Class-M flare, and a<br \/>10% chance of a Class-X flare, both within the next 48 hours<br \/>(February 28 to March 1).<\/p>\n<p>Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>Ionosphere &#8211; February 27, 2025, by F. K. Janda, OK1HH:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Solar activity is now increasing, but the increase is irregular,<br \/>which causes, among other things, a decrease in the reliability of<br \/>forecasts. Geomagnetically quiet periods, especially when associated<br \/>with an increase in total solar activity (such as 20-23 February),<br \/>are accompanied by improved conditions for ionospheric radio wave<br \/>propagation. A subsequent disturbance can cause even further<br \/>improvement (which happened on 24 February).<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Following the increase in solar flare activity (from 23 February),<br \/>two proton flares were observed on 24 February. In the following<br \/>days, the Earth&#8217;s ionosphere was under the influence of a<br \/>solar-derived proton rain, after which the density of free electrons<br \/>in it decreased due to recombination.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;However, the worsening of conditions was only noticeable on 25<br \/>February. The very next day, 26 February, there was an improvement,<br \/>in particular an increase in the MUF on a global scale. The jump in<br \/>the solar wind speed also contributed. However, the changes were so<br \/>rapid, even within a single day, that our assessment of the level of<br \/>conditions could have been reversed, depending on the time of day<br \/>and the frequency bands used.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The developments described can be considered as a harbinger of a<br \/>March increase in solar activity. Since the Spring Equinox is<br \/>approaching, it will contribute to an improvement in ionospheric<br \/>shortwave propagation, more accurately called decameter waves. The<br \/>possible shorter worse spells on March 1-2 and March 5-6 will make<br \/>no difference, with the seasonal improvement not fully manifesting<br \/>itself until the second half of the month.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This weekend is the ARRL International DX SSB contest.\u00a0 Information<br \/>can be found at,  .<\/p>\n<p>For more information concerning shortwave radio propagation, see<br \/> and the ARRL Technical Information<br \/>Service web page at,  For<br \/>an explanation of numbers used in this bulletin, see<br \/> . Information and<br \/>tutorials on propagation can be found at,  .<\/p>\n<p>Also, check this:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Rc8Njt<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<em>Understanding Solar Indices<\/em>&#8221; from September 2002 <em>QST<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>The predicted 10.7 cm flux for February 28 to March 6 is 195, 195,<br \/>190, 190, 190, 190, and 185, with a mean of 190.7.\u00a0 The predicted<br \/>Planetary A Index for February 28 to March 6 is 12, 10, 8, 5, 5, 5,<br \/>and 5, with a mean of 7.1.\u00a0 The predicted K Index for February 28 to<br \/>March 6 is 4, 3, 3, 2, 2, 2, and 2, with a mean of 2.6.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-arrl-solar-report-3?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>02\/28\/2025 A Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) associated with a filament eruptionbecame visible on February 26 at 1448 UTC.\u00a0 Model analysisdetermined this CME to be a miss ahead of the Sun\/Earth&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-793992","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/793992","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=793992"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/793992\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=793992"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=793992"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=793992"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}