{"id":795940,"date":"2025-05-07T04:47:03","date_gmt":"2025-05-07T09:47:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=795940"},"modified":"2025-05-07T04:47:03","modified_gmt":"2025-05-07T09:47:03","slug":"what-to-know-about-kosmos-482-a-soviet-spacecraft-returning-to-earth-after-53-years","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=795940","title":{"rendered":"What to Know About Kosmos-482, a Soviet Spacecraft Returning to Earth After 53 Years"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div data-testid=\"companionColumn-0\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">A robotic Soviet spacecraft has been adrift in space for 53 years. It will return to Earth later this week.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Kosmos-482 launched in March 1972. If all had gone well, it would have landed on the sweltering surface of Venus and become the ninth of the uncrewed Soviet Venera missions to the planet. Instead, a rocket malfunction left it stranded in Earth orbit. Kosmos-482 has been slowly spiraling back toward our world ever since.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">\u201cIt\u2019s this artifact that was meant to go to Venus 50 years ago and was lost and forgotten for half a century,\u201d said Jonathan McDowell, an astronomer at the Harvard &amp; Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics who maintains a public catalog of objects in space. \u201cAnd now it\u2019s going to get its moment in atmospheric entry \u2014 albeit on the wrong planet.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Cloaked in a protective heat shield, the spacecraft, weighing roughly 1,050 pounds, was designed to survive its plunge through the toxic Venusian atmosphere. That means there\u2019s a good chance it will survive its dive through this one, and could make it to the surface at least partly intact.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div data-testid=\"companionColumn-1\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Still, the risk of any injuries on the ground is low.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">\u201cI\u2019m not worried \u2014 I\u2019m not telling all my friends to go to the basement for this,\u201d said Darren McKnight, senior technical fellow at LeoLabs, a company that tracks objects in orbit and monitors Kosmos-482 six times a day. \u201cUsually about once a week we have a large object re-enter Earth\u2019s atmosphere where some remnants of it will survive to the ground.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"css-13o6u42 eoo0vm40\" id=\"link-6bd44f85\">When will Kosmos-482 come back to Earth?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Estimates change daily, but the predicted days of re-entry are currently Friday or Saturday. The New York Times will provide updated estimates as they are revised.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">One calculation of the window by the Aerospace Corporation, a federally supported nonprofit that tracks space debris, suggests 12:42 a.m. Eastern time on May 10, plus or minus 19 hours.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Marco Langbroek, a scientist and satellite tracker at Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands who has tracked Kosmos-482 for years, puts the estimate closer to 4:37 a.m. Eastern on May 10, plus or minus a day.<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"css-13o6u42 eoo0vm40\" id=\"link-4338bfd8\">Where will it land?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">No one knows. \u201cAnd we won\u2019t know until after the fact,\u201d Dr. McDowell said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">That\u2019s because Kosmos-482 is hurtling through space at more than 17,000 miles an hour, and it will be going that fast until atmospheric friction pumps the brakes. So getting the timing wrong by even a half-hour means the spacecraft re-enters more than half a world away, in a different spot.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div data-testid=\"companionColumn-2\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">What\u2019s known is that Kosmos-482\u2019s orbit places it between 52 degrees north latitude and 52 degrees south latitude, which covers Africa, Australia, most of the Americas and much of south- and mid-latitude Europe and Asia.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">\u201cThere are three things that can happen when something re-enters: a splash, a thud or an ouch,\u201d Dr. McKnight said.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">\u201cA splash is really good,\u201d he said, and may be most likely because so much of Earth is covered in oceans. He said the hope was to avoid the \u201cthud\u201d or the \u201couch.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"css-13o6u42 eoo0vm40\" id=\"link-3b84a90a\">Will the spacecraft survive impact?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Assuming Kosmos-482 survives re-entry \u2014 and it should, as long as its heat shield is intact \u2014 the spacecraft will be going around 150 miles an hour, when it smashes into whatever it smashes into, Dr. Langbroek calculated. \u201cI don\u2019t think there\u2019s going to be a lot left afterward,\u201d Dr. McDowell said. \u201cImagine putting your car into a wall at 150 miles an hour and seeing how much of it is left.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">The heat of re-entry should make Kosmos-482 visible as a bright streak through the sky if its return occurs over a populated area at night.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<div data-testid=\"companionColumn-3\">\n<div class=\"css-53u6y8\">\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">If pieces of the spacecraft survive and are recovered, they legally belong to Russia.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">\u201cUnder the law, if you find something, you have an obligation to return it,\u201d said Michelle Hanlon, executive director of the Center for Air and Space Law at the University of Mississippi. \u201cRussia is considered to be the registered owner and therefore continues to have jurisdiction and control over the object.\u201d<\/p>\n<h2 class=\"css-13o6u42 eoo0vm40\" id=\"link-6a76d017\">How do we know the identity of this object?<\/h2>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">Some 25 years ago, Dr. McDowell was going through NORAD\u2019s catalog of roughly 25,000 orbital objects and trying to pin an identity on each. \u201cMost of them, the answer is, \u2018Well, this is a piece of exploded rocket from something fairly boring,\u2019\u201d he recalls.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">But one of them, object 6073, was a bit odd. Launched in 1972 from Kazakhstan, it ended up in a highly elliptical orbit, traveling between 124 and 6,000 miles from Earth.<\/p>\n<p class=\"css-at9mc1 evys1bk0\">As he studied its orbit and size, Dr. McDowell surmised that it must be the wayward Kosmos-482 lander \u2014 not just a piece of debris from the failed launch. The conclusion was supported by multiple observations from the ground, as well as a recently declassified Soviet document.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<aside class=\"css-ew4tgv\" aria-label=\"companion column\"\/><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/05\/07\/science\/kosmos-482-soviet-spacecraft-reentry.html?rand=772170\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A robotic Soviet spacecraft has been adrift in space for 53 years. It will return to Earth later this week. Kosmos-482 launched in March 1972. If all had gone well,&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":795941,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[40],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-795940","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-new-york-times-space-cosmos"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/795940","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=795940"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/795940\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/795941"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=795940"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=795940"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=795940"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}