{"id":796518,"date":"2025-06-06T10:57:07","date_gmt":"2025-06-06T15:57:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=796518"},"modified":"2025-06-06T10:57:07","modified_gmt":"2025-06-06T15:57:07","slug":"the-arrl-solar-report-17","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=796518","title":{"rendered":"The ARRL Solar Report"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">06\/06\/2025<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Solar activity remained at moderate levels earlier this week. There<br \/>was an approximately 20-degree filament eruption on June 4 and a<br \/>possibly related Coronal Mass Ejection (CME). The CME is unlikely to<br \/>have an Earth-directed component, but analysis is in progress.<\/p>\n<p>The geomagnetic field is expected to be quiet to unsettled on June 7<br \/>as High Speed Stream (HSS) activity continues. G1 (Minor) storm<br \/>levels are likely with the anticipated onset of a CME &#8211; that left<br \/>the Sun on June 3 &#8211; around mid-to-late on June 7. On June 8,<br \/>unsettled to active levels are expected.<\/p>\n<p>Unsettled to active conditions are likely June 10 to 12 due to<br \/>recurrent negative polarity Coronal Hole High Speed Stream (CH HSS)<br \/>influences. Unsettled to G1 (Minor) conditions are likely on June 13<br \/>to 22 due to positive polarity CH HSS influences. Unsettled to G1<br \/>(Minor) conditions are likely on June 23 to 28 due to negative<br \/>polarity CH HSS influences.<\/p>\n<p>Solar activity is expected to be low with a chance for M-class<br \/>flares (R1-R2\/Minor-Moderate) and a slight chance for an X-class<br \/>flare (R3-Strong) on June 7.<br \/>\u00a0<br \/>Solar wind speed parameters increased from approximately 550 km\/s to<br \/>nearly 810 km\/s before decreasing to around 760 km\/s. This could<br \/>either be transient influence or a transition back into the Coronal<br \/>Hole High Speed Streams.<br \/>\u00a0<br \/>Quiet to active levels are expected to prevail on June 7.<\/p>\n<p>Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>Ionosphere &#8211; June 5, 2025, from F. K. Janda, OK1HH:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;When assessing solar activity based on the sunspot, or more<br \/>modernly based on the intensity of solar radio noise, we can<br \/>tentatively conclude that the maximum of the 25th cycle occurred<br \/>last spring and summer, or early autumn (the highest smoothed<br \/>sunspot number was in October 2024: R12 = 160.8, and then declined).<br \/>Even so, it was much higher than most astronomers had predicted.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;But that&#8217;s not the end of the story. In May of this year in<br \/>particular, there was a surprising increase in the number and energy<br \/>of particles in the solar wind, especially during larger solar<br \/>flares. Particle ionization also affects the Earth&#8217;s ionosphere,<br \/>although not as nicely as we would like given the state of the<br \/>Earth&#8217;s ionosphere. In short, shortwave propagation conditions were<br \/>rarely good during May and especially early June 2025. They were<br \/>mostly unstable, disrupted, with irregular daily cycles and frequent<br \/>occurrences of increased attenuation.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;An exceptional phenomenon is the so-called Forbush effect, also<br \/>known as the &#8216;Forbush decrease&#8217; in the intensity of galactic cosmic<br \/>rays after the arrival of a CME in the vicinity of Earth. The<br \/>largest decrease in cosmic ray intensity in more than 20 years, by<br \/>as much as 25%, was recorded on June 1, 2025 (the last time this<br \/>happened was on October 30, 2003). Particles ejected by the Sun will<br \/>remain in our vicinity and reduce the intensity of cosmic rays of<br \/>galactic origin for another week or two.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A decline is generally expected in the further development of solar<br \/>activity. Only optimists admit that there will be one more increase<br \/>this year, probably in the northern half of the solar disk.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>For more information concerning shortwave radio propagation, see<br \/> and the ARRL Technical Information<br \/>Service web page at,  For<br \/>an explanation of numbers used in this bulletin, see<br \/> . Information and<br \/>tutorials on propagation can be found at,  .<\/p>\n<p>Also, check this:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Rc8Njt<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<em>Understanding Solar Indices<\/em>&#8221; from September 2002 <em>QST<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>The Predicted Planetary A Index for June 7 to 13 is 10, 8, 5, 15,<br \/>12, 10, and 35, with a mean of 13.6.\u00a0 Predicted Planetary K Index is<br \/>3, 3, 2, 4, 4, 3, and 6, with a mean of 3.6.\u00a0 Predicted 10.7<br \/>centimeter flux is 155, 155, 155, 155, 150, 150, and 155, with a<br \/>mean of 153.6.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-arrl-solar-report-17?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>06\/06\/2025 Solar activity remained at moderate levels earlier this week. Therewas an approximately 20-degree filament eruption on June 4 and apossibly related Coronal Mass Ejection (CME). The CME is unlikely&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-796518","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/796518","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=796518"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/796518\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=796518"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=796518"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=796518"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}