{"id":798265,"date":"2025-09-17T10:17:25","date_gmt":"2025-09-17T15:17:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=798265"},"modified":"2025-09-17T10:17:25","modified_gmt":"2025-09-17T15:17:25","slug":"xrism-uncovers-a-mystery-in-the-cosmic-winds-of-change","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=798265","title":{"rendered":"XRISM uncovers a mystery in the cosmic winds of change"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div id=\"\">\n<header class=\"entry article__block\">\n\t<span class=\"pillar article__item\">Science &amp; Exploration<\/span><\/p>\n<p>\t\t\t\t\t\t<span>17\/09\/2025<\/span><br \/>\n\t\t\t\t<span><span id=\"viewcount\">34<\/span><small> views<\/small><\/span><br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<span><span id=\"ezsr_total_26826960\">0<\/span><small> likes<\/small><\/span><\/p>\n<\/header>\n<div class=\"abstract article__block article__item\">\n<p>The X-Ray Imaging and Spectroscopy Mission (XRISM) has revealed an unexpected difference between the powerful winds launching from a disc around a neutron star and those from material circling supermassive black holes. The surprisingly dense wind blowing from the stellar system challenges our understanding of how such winds form and drive change in their surroundings.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"article__block\">\n<figure class=\"article__image article__image--right\"><figcaption class=\"image__caption\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tXRISM spacecraft<br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>On 25 February 2024, XRISM used its Resolve instrument to look at neutron star GX13+1, the burnt-out core of a once larger star. GX13+1 is a bright X-ray source. The X-rays are coming from a disc of hot matter, known as an accretion disc, that is gradually spiralling down to strike the neutron star\u2019s surface.<\/p>\n<p>Such inflows also power outflows that influence and transform the cosmic environment. Yet the details of how these outflows are produced remain a matter of ongoing research. Hence, why XRISM was observing GX13+1.<\/p>\n<p>Given the unprecedented power of Resolve to tease out the energy of incoming X-ray photons, the XRISM team expected to see those details as never before.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;When we first saw the wealth of details in the data, we felt we were witnessing a game-changing result,&#8221; says Matteo Guainazzi, ESA XRISM project scientist. &#8220;For many of us, it was the realisation of a dream that we had chased for decades.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Such cosmic winds are much more than scientific curiosities \u2013 they are the winds that drive cosmic change.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"article__block\">\n<figure class=\"article__image article__image--large\"><figcaption class=\"image__caption\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tCosmic winds of change<br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>They appear also from supermassive black holes systems found at the centres of galaxies, and can cause stars to form by triggering the collapse of giant molecular clouds, or they can stop star formation by heating and blowing those clouds apart. Astronomers call this \u2018feedback\u2019, and it can be so powerful that the winds from a supermassive black hole can control the growth of its entire parent galaxy.<\/p>\n<p>Since the mechanisms generating the winds from supermassive black holes may be fundamentally the same as those at work around GX13+1, the team chose to look at GX13+1 because it is closer and therefore appears brighter than the supermassive black hole varieties, meaning that it can be studied in more detail.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"article__block\">\n<p>There was a surprise. A few days before their observations were due to take place, GX13+1 unexpectedly got brighter \u2013 reaching or even exceeding a theoretical ceiling known as the Eddington limit.<\/p>\n<p>The principle behind this limit is that as more matter falls onto a compact object such as a black hole or a neutron star, more energy is released. The faster energy is released, the greater the pressure it exerts on other infalling material, pushing more of it back into space. At the Eddington limit, the amount of high-energy light being produced is essentially enough to transform almost all of the infalling matter into a cosmic wind.<\/p>\n<p>And Resolve happened to be watching GX13+1 as this staggering event took place.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"article__block\">\n<figure class=\"article__image article__image--right\"><figcaption class=\"image__caption\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tXRISM in a nutshell<br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&#8220;We could not have scheduled this if we had tried,&#8221; said Chris Done, Durham University, UK, the lead researcher on the study. &#8220;The system went from about half its maximum radiation output to something much more intense, creating a wind that was thicker than we&#8217;d ever seen before.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But mysteriously, the wind was not travelling at the speed that the XRISM scientists were expecting. It remained around 1 million km\/h. While fast by any terrestrial standard, this is decidedly sluggish when compared to the cosmic winds produced near the Eddington limit around a supermassive black hole. In that situation, the winds can reach 20 to 30 percent the speed of light, more than 200 million km\/h.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cIt is still a surprise to me how \u2018slow\u2019 this wind is,\u201d says Chris, \u201cas well as how thick it is. It\u2019s like looking at the Sun through a bank of fog rolling towards us. Everything goes dimmer when the fog is thick.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>It was not the only difference the team observed. XRISM had earlier revealed a wind from a supermassive black hole at the Eddington limit. There the wind was ultrafast and clumpy, whereas the wind in GX13+1 is slow and smooth flowing.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe winds were utterly different but they&#8217;re from systems which are about the same in terms of the Eddington limit. So if these winds really are just powered by radiation pressure, why are they different?\u201d asks Chris.<\/p>\n<p>The team has proposed that it comes down to the temperature of the accretion disc that forms around the central object. Counterintuitively, supermassive black holes tend to have accretion discs that are lower in temperature than those around stellar mass binary systems with black holes or neutron stars.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"article__block\">\n<p>This is because the accretion discs around supermassive black holes are larger. They are also more luminous, but their power is spread across a larger area \u2013 everything is bigger around a big black hole. So, the typical kind of radiation released by a supermassive black hole accretion disc is ultraviolet, which carries less energy than the X-rays released by the stellar binary accretion discs.<\/p>\n<p>Since ultraviolet light interacts with matter much more readily than X-rays do, Chris and her colleagues speculate that this may push the matter more efficiently, creating the faster winds observed in black hole systems.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"article__block\">\n<figure class=\"article__image article__image--left\"><figcaption class=\"image__caption\">\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\tArtist impression of ESA NewAthena<br \/>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>If so, the discovery promises to reshape our understanding of how energy and matter interact in some of the most extreme environments in the Universe, providing a more complete window into the complex mechanisms that shape galaxies and drive cosmic evolution.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe unprecedented resolution of XRISM allows us to investigate these objects \u2013 and many more \u2013 in far greater detail, paving the way for the next-generation, high-resolution X-ray telescope such as NewAthena,\u201d says Camille Diez, ESA Research fellow.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<p><b>Notes for editors<\/b><\/p>\n<p>\u2018Multi-phase winds from a super-Eddington X-ray binary are slower than expected\u2019 by the XRISM collaboration is published in <i>Nature<\/i> https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-025-09495-w<\/p>\n<p>XRISM (pronounced krizz-em) was launched on 7 September 2023. It is a mission led by the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) in partnership with NASA and ESA. It carries two instruments: an X-ray calorimeter called Resolve capable of measuring the energy of individual X-ray photons to produce a spectrum at unprecedented level of \u2018energy resolution\u2019 (the capability of an instrument to distinguish the X-ray \u2018colours\u2019), and a large field-of-view X-ray CCD camera to image the surrounding field called Xtend.<\/p>\n<p>\n<b>Contact:<\/b><br \/>ESA Media relations<br \/>media@esa.int<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<div class=\"share button-group article__block article__item\">\n<p><button id=\"ezsr_26826960_5_5\" class=\"btn ezsr-star-rating-enabled\" title=\"Like\">Like<\/button><\/p>\n<p id=\"ezsr_just_rated_26826960\" class=\"ezsr-just-rated hide\">Thank you for liking<\/p>\n<p id=\"ezsr_has_rated_26826960\" class=\"ezsr-has-rated hide\">You have already liked this page, you can only like it once!<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.esa.int\/Science_Exploration\/Space_Science\/XRISM_uncovers_a_mystery_in_the_cosmic_winds_of_change?rand=771654\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Science &amp; Exploration 17\/09\/2025 34 views 0 likes The X-Ray Imaging and Spectroscopy Mission (XRISM) has revealed an unexpected difference between the powerful winds launching from a disc around a&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":798266,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-798265","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ESA"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/798265","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=798265"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/798265\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/798266"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=798265"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=798265"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=798265"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}