{"id":799138,"date":"2025-11-14T14:15:30","date_gmt":"2025-11-14T19:15:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=799138"},"modified":"2025-11-14T14:15:30","modified_gmt":"2025-11-14T19:15:30","slug":"the-arrl-solar-update-8","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=799138","title":{"rendered":"The ARRL Solar Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">11\/14\/2025<\/span><\/p>\n<p>There were two nights of visible aurora throughout the continental<br \/>US and dead HF bands due to a severe geomagnetic storm caused by<br \/>what Space.com calls &#8220;a colossal X5.1 class solar flare&#8221; and<br \/>associated coronal mass ejection (CME) on Tuesday, November 11.<\/p>\n<p>Spaceweather.com for November 14 reports that a NASA model of the<br \/>latest CME suggests that it could deliver a glancing blow to our<br \/>planet&#8217;s magnetic field late on November 16.<br \/>\u00a0 <br \/>Meanwhile, Region 4274 was responsible for multiple low- to<br \/>mid-level C-class flares. The largest was a C4.5\/Sf on November 12.<br \/>Slight decay was observed in Region 4274. Motion along the inversion<br \/>lines was minimal within the group. The rest of the spot groups were<br \/>either stable or in decay. No Earth-directed CMEs were observed.<br \/>\u00a0 <br \/>Solar activity is now forecast to be high, with R1-R2<br \/>(Minor-Moderate) expected and X-class (R3-strong) activity likely on<br \/>November 15, mostly due to the flare potential of Region 4274.<br \/>\u00a0 <br \/>Solar wind parameters continued to reflect persistent negative<br \/>polarity coronal hole high speed stream influences (CH HSS).\u00a0 Solar<br \/>wind speeds were between 450 km\/s and 600 km\/s. Phi was variable<br \/>through the first half of the period before turning mostly negative<br \/>for the second half. The solar wind environment had likely become<br \/>mildly enhanced with CME influences on November 10 as the November 7<br \/>CME passed in close proximity to Earth. Stronger solar wind<br \/>disturbances were likely over November 11-12 due to the anticipated<br \/>arrival of the November 9 asymmetric halo CME.<\/p>\n<p>R1-R2 (Minor-Moderate) radio blackouts are likely, with a chance for<br \/>an isolated R3 (Strong) event, through 16 November primarily due to<br \/>AR4274s past flare history coupled with its current potential.<\/p>\n<p>The geomagnetic field is expected to be quiet to unsettled levels on<br \/>November 15.<\/p>\n<p>Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>Ionosphere, November 13, 2025, by F. K. Janda, OK1HH:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In October, during the last solar rotation, two active regions on<br \/>the Sun: AR4246 and AR4248 were very interesting. Although they were<br \/>not the largest, their magnetic configuration indicated a possible<br \/>further increase in eruptive activity. This was confirmed during the<br \/>following parade on the far side of the Sun, when we could observe<br \/>several more powerful CMEs, especially on the eastern limb of the<br \/>solar disk.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;After their emergence on the disk, the culprit was reliably<br \/>identified as the AR4246 region, now AR4274, which continued to grow<br \/>to three times its October size. Above all, on November 9, 10, and<br \/>11, it produced a series of three large solar flares, each of which<br \/>was significantly more powerful than the previous one, including an<br \/>increase in the energy of the ejected protons by one order of<br \/>magnitude.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The particle cloud from the second flare was faster than the one<br \/>from the first. It caught up with and cannibalized it, reaching<br \/>Earth after midnight UT on November 12 and causing powerful<br \/>geomagnetic disturbances accompanied by auroras visible at<br \/>mid-latitudes. It had the greatest impact on the ionosphere on<br \/>November 12, when MUF values dropped and attenuation increased.<br \/>After that, however, shortwave propagation conditions behaved very<br \/>unusually and interestingly.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A sporadic-E layer appeared, ionospheric waveguides were formed,<br \/>allowing communication with very low transmitter power,<br \/>trans-equatorial routes opened up excellently, and, conversely,<br \/>routes leading through the auroral oval closed. The propagation of<br \/>radio waves through the polar region was further complicated by<br \/>attenuation in the polar cap (PCA).<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Until the AR4274 region fades away in a few days, we can expect<br \/>more similar surprises, although probably not as powerful. Solar<br \/>activity will begin to decline in the coming days, with geomagnetic<br \/>activity likely to decline a little later.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The latest report from Dr. Tamitha Skov, WX6SWW, can be found on<br \/>YouTube at,  .<\/p>\n<p>The Predicted Planetary A Index for November 15 to 21 is 5, 10, 10,<br \/>5, 5, 12, and 10, with a mean of 8.1.\u00a0 Predicted Planetary K index<br \/>is 2, 3, 3, 2, 2, 4, and 3, with a mean of 2.7.\u00a0 Predicted<br \/>10.7-centimeter flux is 170, 165, 170, 165, 160, 155, and 155, with<br \/>a mean of 162.9.<\/p>\n<p>For more information concerning shortwave radio propagation, see<br \/> and the ARRL Technical Information<br \/>Service web page at,  For<br \/>an explanation of numbers used in this bulletin, see<br \/> . Information and<br \/>tutorials on propagation can be found at,  .<\/p>\n<p>Also, check this:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Rc8Njt<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<em>Understanding Solar Indices<\/em>&#8221; from September 2002 <em>QST<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-arrl-solar-update-9?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>11\/14\/2025 There were two nights of visible aurora throughout the continentalUS and dead HF bands due to a severe geomagnetic storm caused bywhat Space.com calls &#8220;a colossal X5.1 class solar&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-799138","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/799138","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=799138"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/799138\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=799138"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=799138"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=799138"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}