{"id":799967,"date":"2026-01-02T13:21:35","date_gmt":"2026-01-02T18:21:35","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=799967"},"modified":"2026-01-02T13:21:35","modified_gmt":"2026-01-02T18:21:35","slug":"the-arrl-solar-update-13","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=799967","title":{"rendered":"The ARRL Solar Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">01\/02\/2026<\/span><\/p>\n<p>The January 2, 2026, report from Spaceweather.com has updated<br \/>details about the Coronal Mass Ejections predicted to hit the Earth<br \/>on January 3 and 4.<\/p>\n<p>Solar wind parameters are expected to be disturbed through January<br \/>4, 2026, due to a combination of Coronal Hole High Speed Stream and<br \/>Coronal Mass Ejection activity. There is the potential for glancing<br \/>influences late into January 3 from CMEs that left the Sun on<br \/>December 28 to 30. Additional enhancements are possible again on<br \/>January 4 with the possible indirect impact of the CME that left the<br \/>Sun on January 2.<\/p>\n<p>By early January 3 the arrival of the December 31 is expected to<br \/>cause unsettled to G1-G2 (Minor-Moderate) storming. Additional<br \/>geomagnetic storming is anticipated on January 4 with the possible<br \/>impact of the January 2 CME.<\/p>\n<p>Solar activity is expected to be predominately low through January<br \/>24, with C-class flares expected throughout the outlook period.<br \/>M-class flares (R1-R2\/Minor-Moderate) range from a chance to likely<br \/>at times as active regions evolve and rotate on\/off the disk.<br \/>X-class flares (R3-Strong or greater) range from a slight chance to<br \/>a chance during periods of enhanced active region complexity.<\/p>\n<p>Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>Ionosphere, January 1, 2026, by F. K. Janda, OK1HH:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In mid-December 2025, we observed a relatively significant decline<br \/>in solar activity within the approximately 27-day fluctuation caused<br \/>by the rotation of the Sun. It seemed that the maximum of the<br \/>eleven-year cycle would end after a period of high activity in<br \/>2024-2025. However, a significant increase in solar activity in the<br \/>second half of December suggests the opposite-solar activity will<br \/>probably remain relatively high in 2026!<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Based on increased flare activity, accompanied by coronal mass<br \/>ejections (CMEs) in the last days of 2025, geomagnetic disturbances<br \/>can be predicted in the first days of 2026. Their probability should<br \/>increase since January 1 (G1 level) until January 3 (when G2 level<br \/>can be expected). Calm days should follow since January 5.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;In the current eleven-year cycle, we have become accustomed to the<br \/>fact that the parameters of the ionosphere differ from those<br \/>measured in previous cycles at the same level of solar activity. For<br \/>example, the critical frequencies of the F2 ionospheric layer are<br \/>significantly lower. This will probably also apply to the rest of<br \/>the cycle. Even so, the forecast of a slower decline in solar<br \/>activity is favorable for the shortwave propagation.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Region 4330 was responsible for two eruptions seen in SUVI imagery.<br \/>The first was associated with a coronal mass ejection (CME), first<br \/>observed in coronagraph imagery December 30, 2025, and was closely<br \/>followed by a second CME from the northeast quadrant, potentially<br \/>from near Region 4324. None of their modeled trajectory indicated<br \/>direct impact near Earth. Further coronagraph images are necessary<br \/>to evaluate whether the second eruption from Region 4330 will result<br \/>in a visible CME. No other Earth-directed CME was observed during<br \/>the period.<br \/>\u00a0<br \/>Solar activity is likely to be moderate with a chance for X-class<br \/>flares through January 2, 2026, due to the current magnetic<br \/>complexity and development of the active regions on the visible<br \/>solar disk.<br \/>\u00a0<br \/>Periods of active conditions are likely on January 9 and 10 and on<br \/>January 12 to 14 due to negative polarity CH HSS influences.\u00a0 <\/p>\n<p>The latest solar report from Dr. Tamitha Skov, WX6SWW, can be found<br \/>on YouTube at:<br \/> .<\/p>\n<p>The Predicted Planetary A Index for January 3, 2026 to January 9 is<br \/>15, 12, 5, 5, 5, 5, and 15, with a mean of 8.9\u00a0 Predicted Planetary<br \/>K Index is 4, 4, 2, 2, 2, 2, and 4, with a mean of 2.9.<br \/>10.7-centimeter flux is 160, 155, 150, 155, 140, 130, and 125, with a<br \/>mean of 145.<\/p>\n<p>For more information concerning shortwave radio propagation, see<br \/> and the ARRL Technical Information<br \/>Service web page at,  For<br \/>an explanation of numbers used in this bulletin, see<br \/> . Information and<br \/>tutorials on propagation can be found at,  .<\/p>\n<p>Also, check this:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Rc8Njt<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<em>Understanding Solar Indices<\/em>&#8221; from September 2002 <em>QST<\/em>.<br \/>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-arrl-solar-update-14?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>01\/02\/2026 The January 2, 2026, report from Spaceweather.com has updateddetails about the Coronal Mass Ejections predicted to hit the Earthon January 3 and 4. Solar wind parameters are expected to&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-799967","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/799967","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=799967"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/799967\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=799967"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=799967"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=799967"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}