{"id":800018,"date":"2026-01-07T11:56:30","date_gmt":"2026-01-07T16:56:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=800018"},"modified":"2026-01-07T11:56:30","modified_gmt":"2026-01-07T16:56:30","slug":"super-low-density-worlds-reveal-how-common-planetary-systems-form","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=800018","title":{"rendered":"Super-low density worlds reveal how common planetary systems form"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div xmlns:default=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" id=\"\">\n<p xmlns:default=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\">\n<figure class=\"ArticleImage\">\n<div class=\"Image__Wrapper\"><\/div><figcaption class=\"ArticleImageCaption\">\n<div class=\"ArticleImageCaption__CaptionWrapper\">\n<p class=\"ArticleImageCaption__Title\">One of the low-density planets compared with Earth<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleImageCaption__Credit\">NASA<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p>\n<p>Four planets orbiting a newly born star in our galaxy are so light that they have the density of polystyrene, and could provide a key missing link in helping us understand how the most common planetary systems form.<\/p>\n<p>This solar system is unusual when compared with most other planetary systems in the Milky Way, which typically contain planets larger than Earth but smaller than Neptune. Astronomers have found hundreds of planetary systems like these, but almost all of them are formed around stars that are billions of years old, making it difficult to explain how they take shape.<\/p>\n<p>Now, Erik Petigura at the University of California, Los Angeles, and his colleagues have identified four tightly clustered planets that appear to have formed recently, given that they orbit a young, 20-million-year-old star called V1298 Tau.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWe are seeing a young version of a type of planetary system we see all over the galaxy,\u201d says Petigura.<\/p>\n<p>V1298 Tau and its four planets were first discovered in 2017, but little was known about the planets themselves. Petigura and his team used telescopes in space and on Earth to observe them for five years, looking for subtle variations in the time it took for each planet to complete an orbit and pass in front of the star due to the gravitational forces of attraction among the four worlds. By measuring these small differences, they could more accurately calculate each planet\u2019s radius and mass.<\/p>\n<section>\n<\/section>\n<p><span class=\"js-content-prompt-opportunity\"\/><\/p>\n<p>However, for this method to work, they needed to know beforehand how long each of the four planets should take to orbit the star in the absence of these gravitational forces. They didn\u2019t have this information for the outermost planet, so had to use educated guesswork \u2013 and if their guess was wrong, then all of their calculations would have failed.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cI thought that this, frankly, was kind of a fool\u2019s errand,\u201d says Petigura. \u201cThere were so many ways in which we could have gotten this wrong\u2026 the first time we recovered [the outermost planet\u2019s] transit, I almost fell out of my chair; it was like somebody getting a hole in one in golf.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Once they had accurately measured all the planets\u2019 orbital periods and calculated their radii and masses, they could then estimate the density of each planet. They found these were among the lowest of any known exoplanet, with radii between five to 10 times Earth\u2019s, but masses only a few times as great.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThese planets have the density of Styrofoam; they\u2019re extremely low-density,\u201d says Petigura.<\/p>\n<p>This is because the planets are in the process of contracting due to gravitational forces to form planets that are around only one to three times Earth\u2019s radius, so-called super-Earths or sub-Neptunes. Petigura and his team simulated how the planets would evolve and found that they would eventually end up as these kinds of planets.<\/p>\n<p>V1298 Tau\u2019s planets are configured in what\u2019s called orbital resonance, which means the planets\u2019 orbital times are multiples of each other. This fits with the picture that astronomers have of how most planetary systems form, including our solar system, says Sean Raymond at the University of Bordeaux in France. They\u00a0begin as crowded systems with neat orbital resonances but then become unstable, in terms of the ratio of their periods.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis discovered system of close-in, lower-mass planets orbiting a very young star represents a potential precursor to a typical sub-Neptune system,\u201d says Raymond. \u201cThis discovery is amazing, in that it is very hard to characterise such young systems.\u201d<\/p>\n<section class=\"ArticleTopics\" data-component-name=\"article-topics\">\n<p class=\"ArticleTopics__Heading\">Topics:<\/p>\n<\/section><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.newscientist.com\/article\/2510539-super-low-density-worlds-reveal-how-common-planetary-systems-form\/?utm_campaign=RSS%7CNSNS&#038;utm_source=NSNS&#038;utm_medium=RSS&#038;utm_content=space&#038;rand=772163\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>One of the low-density planets compared with Earth NASA Four planets orbiting a newly born star in our galaxy are so light that they have the density of polystyrene, and&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":800019,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-800018","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-new-scientist"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/800018","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=800018"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/800018\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/800019"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=800018"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=800018"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=800018"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}