{"id":800485,"date":"2026-02-03T09:37:30","date_gmt":"2026-02-03T14:37:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=800485"},"modified":"2026-02-03T09:37:30","modified_gmt":"2026-02-03T14:37:30","slug":"why-did-spacex-just-apply-to-launch-1-million-satellites","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=800485","title":{"rendered":"Why did SpaceX just apply to launch 1 million satellites?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div xmlns:default=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\" id=\"\">\n<p xmlns:default=\"http:\/\/www.w3.org\/2000\/svg\">\n<figure class=\"ArticleImage\">\n<div class=\"Image__Wrapper\"><\/div><figcaption class=\"ArticleImageCaption\">\n<div class=\"ArticleImageCaption__CaptionWrapper\">\n<p class=\"ArticleImageCaption__Title\">A SpaceX satellite launch at Kennedy Space Center, Florida<\/p>\n<p class=\"ArticleImageCaption__Credit\">Geopix\/Alamy<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019re a month into 2026, yet it\u2019s clear what one of the major space stories of the year is going to be: mega-constellations, and the ongoing attempts to launch thousands of satellites into Earth\u2019s orbit.<\/p>\n<p>The latest development is that SpaceX has asked the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in the US for permission to launch 1 million orbital data centre satellites. The request is unprecedented. The previous largest filing with the FCC, also by SpaceX, was for 42,000 Starlink satellites in 2019.<\/p>\n<p>    <span class=\"js-content-prompt-opportunity\"\/><\/p>\n<p>\u201cThis is beyond what\u2019s been proposed by any constellation,\u201d says Victoria Samson at the Secure World Foundation in the US.<\/p>\n<p>SpaceX already operates the largest fleet of satellites in orbit, the Starlink internet constellation, which makes up about 9500 of the 14,500 satellites in orbit, only 1 per cent of SpaceX\u2019s planned orbital data centre satellites. Those Starlink satellites alone are already making conditions in orbit hazardous, with SpaceX having to dodge 300,000 collisions in 2025.<\/p>\n<p>In the company\u2019s latest filing on 31 January, and also shared in an update written by CEO Elon Musk, SpaceX said it wants to develop vast orbital data centres in space to power AI. \u201cLaunching a constellation of a million satellites that operate as orbital data centres is a first step towards becoming a Kardashev II-level civilization,\u201d Musk wrote, referring to the Kardashev scale, a method proposed by Soviet astronomer Nikolai Kardashev in 1964 to measure the technological prowess of a civilisation.<\/p>\n<section>\n<\/section>\n<p>The idea of launching data centres into space, where they can get uninterrupted sunlight, has grown in popularity over the last few years as energy demands for AI have skyrocketed. In November 2025, the US company Starcloud launched a demonstration data centre into space containing an advanced Nvidia chip, while the European Commission recently conducted a study that said orbital data centres were achievable.<\/p>\n<p>Musk said launching the constellation would be possible using SpaceX\u2019s reusable Starship rocket that is currently under development, the most powerful rocket in history. \u201cWith launches every hour carrying 200 tons per flight, Starship will deliver millions of tons to orbit and beyond per year, enabling an exciting future where humanity is out exploring amongst the stars,\u201d he wrote.<\/p>\n<p>The filing preceded the announcement on 2 February that SpaceX would acquire xAI, another of Musk\u2019s companies that owns the social media site X and the controversial Grok chatbot. \u201cIf AI is what they want the orbital data centres for, then it\u2019s a bit of a bundled package,\u201d says Ruth Pritchard-Kelly, an expert in satellite regulation in the US.<\/p>\n<p>SpaceX is not alone in its ambition to put many more satellites into orbit. On 29 December, China submitted an application with the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), a United Nations body that allocates portions of the radio spectrum in space, to launch 200,000 satellites into orbit. While there is no defined limit on how many satellites can safely be launched, previous studies have suggested it might be possible to operate millions of satellites in orbit, although anything above 100,000 is considered to become extremely hard to manage.<\/p>\n<p>It will take the FCC months to decide whether to approve SpaceX\u2019s request, during which time it will open the application to public comments, while a separate filing will also need to be made with the ITU. If the FCC does approve it, SpaceX would normally be given a deadline of six years to deploy half the constellation \u2013 a requirement usually stipulated by the FCC \u2013 but SpaceX has asked for this requirement to be waived because it argued the satellites would mostly communicate by optical link, and not cause interference in radio.<\/p>\n<p>SpaceX said it would operate the satellites between 500 and 2000 kilometres in altitude on slightly polar orbits, mostly above where Starlink currently operates. The size of each proposed satellite is unknown but, presuming they are similar in size to current Starlink satellites and each Starship could carry about 100 such satellites, it would take 10,000 Starship launches to complete the constellation.<\/p>\n<p>Presuming a launch every hour, as suggested by Musk, it would take just over a year to deploy 1 million satellites. SpaceX says it would preserve the safety of Earth orbit by placing the satellites into \u201cdisposal orbits\u201d at the end of their life either high above Earth, where it would take centuries for them to fall back to the planet, or into an orbit around the sun.<\/p>\n<p>Musk\u2019s proposed mega-constellation would have a significant impact on astronomy. SpaceX said in its application it would \u201ccontinue its long track record of successful collaboration and innovation with the scientific and astronomy community.\u201d However, in December Alejandro Borlaff at NASA Ames Research Centre in California and his colleagues found that adding 500,000 satellites to Earth\u2019s orbit would mean \u201cnearly every single telescope image obtained from the ground or space will be contaminated by satellites,\u201d says Borlaff, impacting scientific discovery.<\/p>\n<p>Orbital data centre satellites might be even brighter than many existing satellites because they would not only require large reflective solar panels to generate power but also large radiators to expel heat into the vacuum of space, like those on the International Space Station.<\/p>\n<p>Whether SpaceX is serious about launching 1 million satellites is another question: it might instead be something of a joke by Musk, says Pritchard-Kelly, given the absurdity of the number. \u201cIt\u2019s gobsmackingly large,\u201d she says. \u201cIt could just be for shock and awe,\u201d with the true number of planned satellites likely to be much lower. SpaceX and the FCC did not reply to a request for comment.<\/p>\n<p><section class=\"SpecialArticleUnit\">\n            <picture class=\"SpecialArticleUnit__ImageWrapper\">\n            <img decoding=\"async\" class=\"Image SpecialArticleUnit__Image\" alt=\"New Scientist. Science news and long reads from expert journalists, covering developments in science, technology, health and the environment on the website and the magazine.\" width=\"2560\" height=\"1707\" src=\"https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/05144907\/shutterstock_2601376011-scaled.jpg\" srcset=\"https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/05144907\/shutterstock_2601376011-scaled.jpg?width=300 300w, https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/05144907\/shutterstock_2601376011-scaled.jpg?width=375 375w, https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/05144907\/shutterstock_2601376011-scaled.jpg?width=500 500w, https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/05144907\/shutterstock_2601376011-scaled.jpg?width=600 600w, https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/05144907\/shutterstock_2601376011-scaled.jpg?width=700 700w, https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/05144907\/shutterstock_2601376011-scaled.jpg?width=750 750w, https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/05144907\/shutterstock_2601376011-scaled.jpg?width=800 800w, https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/05144907\/shutterstock_2601376011-scaled.jpg?width=900 900w, https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/05144907\/shutterstock_2601376011-scaled.jpg?width=1003 1003w, https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/05144907\/shutterstock_2601376011-scaled.jpg?width=1100 1100w, https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/05144907\/shutterstock_2601376011-scaled.jpg?width=1200 1200w, https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/05144907\/shutterstock_2601376011-scaled.jpg?width=1300 1300w, https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/05144907\/shutterstock_2601376011-scaled.jpg?width=1400 1400w, https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/05144907\/shutterstock_2601376011-scaled.jpg?width=1500 1500w, https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/05144907\/shutterstock_2601376011-scaled.jpg?width=1600 1600w, https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/05144907\/shutterstock_2601376011-scaled.jpg?width=1700 1700w, https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/05144907\/shutterstock_2601376011-scaled.jpg?width=1800 1800w, https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/05144907\/shutterstock_2601376011-scaled.jpg?width=1900 1900w, https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/05144907\/shutterstock_2601376011-scaled.jpg?width=2006 2006w\" sizes=\"auto, (min-width: 1277px) 375px, (min-width: 1040px) 26.36vw, 99.44vw\" loading=\"lazy\" data-image-context=\"Special Article Unit\" data-caption=\"\" data-credit=\"Shutterstock\"\/>\n        <\/picture>\n<div class=\"SpecialArticleUnit__CopyWrapper\">\n<h3 class=\"SpecialArticleUnit__Heading\">The history and future of space exploration: US<\/h3>\n<div class=\"SpecialArticleUnit__Copy\">\n<p>Embark on an extraordinary journey through the heart of the US\u2019s space and astronomy landmarks, designed for curious minds and lifelong learners.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"ArticleTopics\" data-component-name=\"article-topics\">\n<p class=\"ArticleTopics__Heading\">Topics:<\/p>\n<\/section><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.newscientist.com\/article\/2514106-why-did-spacex-just-apply-to-launch-1-million-satellites\/?utm_campaign=RSS%7CNSNS&#038;utm_source=NSNS&#038;utm_medium=RSS&#038;utm_content=space&#038;rand=772163\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A SpaceX satellite launch at Kennedy Space Center, Florida Geopix\/Alamy We\u2019re a month into 2026, yet it\u2019s clear what one of the major space stories of the year is going&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":800486,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[39],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-800485","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-new-scientist"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/800485","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=800485"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/800485\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/800486"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=800485"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=800485"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=800485"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}