{"id":800566,"date":"2026-02-06T19:15:29","date_gmt":"2026-02-07T00:15:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=800566"},"modified":"2026-02-06T19:15:29","modified_gmt":"2026-02-07T00:15:29","slug":"the-arrl-solar-update-18","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=800566","title":{"rendered":"The ARRL Solar Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">02\/06\/2026<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Solar activity was at high levels for most of the week, dominated by<br \/>Region 4366. The most notable event was an impulsive X4.2 flare from<br \/>that region on February 4. Throughout the period, Region 4366<br \/>continued to exhibit a slight reduction in area and a modest<br \/>simplification of its magnetic complexity. The remaining numbered<br \/>regions on the visible disk remained stable or in a state of slight<br \/>decay.<br \/>\u00a0<br \/>Three eruptions were observed in coronagraph imagery during the<br \/>period. First was a coronal mass ejection (CME) off the southeastern<br \/>limb, first observed in C2 imagery on February 4, and was likely<br \/>associated with flaring near Regions 4370 and 4371. This event was<br \/>followed by post-eruptive arcades also on February 4 at the same<br \/>location, which further confirmed the source region despite flare<br \/>activity being partially obscured by Region 4366. Modeling indicates<br \/>no Earth-directed component.<br \/>\u00a0<br \/>The second was a narrow eruption to the NNW, first seen in C2<br \/>imagery on February 4. While potentially associated with the<br \/>aforementioned X4.2 event, it dissipated quickly and its analysis is<br \/>low confidence. Lastly, there was another narrow eruption noted off<br \/>the NE, first visible in SOHO\/LASCO C2 imagery. This event was<br \/>likely a sympathetic eruption triggered by the X4.2, starting<br \/>between Regions 4366 and 4367.<br \/>\u00a0<br \/>There is a slight potential of minor glancing blows from these<br \/>eruptions early on February 8.<br \/>\u00a0<br \/>Solar wind parameters initially reflected nominal background<br \/>conditions before showing a clear disturbance beginning February 3.<br \/>Solar wind speed remained in a slow-wind regime, gradually<br \/>increasing from about 290 km\/s to a peak near 340 km\/s.<br \/>\u00a0 <br \/>Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>Ionosphere, February 5, 2026, by F. K. Janda, OK1HH:<\/p>\n<p>Solar activity has increased again, so the maximum of the 25th<br \/>eleven-year cycle continues. This time, active region No. 4366 is<br \/>primarily responsible for this. It suddenly emerged on January 30 in<br \/>the southeast of the solar disk in a simple Beta magnetic<br \/>configuration. The next day, it did not grow, but changed its<br \/>configuration to Beta-Gamma-Delta, allowing for larger solar flares.<br \/>Then, on February 1, it increased its area tenfold, while an<br \/>extremely strong proton flare was observed in it, peaking on<br \/>February 2 at 0002 UT.<\/p>\n<p>Until February 4, it had further doubled in size, with the magnetic<br \/>configuration remaining Beta-Gamma-Delta, while the production of<br \/>energetically significant flares continued. One to two X-class<br \/>flares and several M-class flares are recorded daily, while on<br \/>February 4, active region No. 4366 crossed the central meridian.<\/p>\n<p>This further increased the likelihood of the Earth being hit by an<br \/>intensified solar wind and the occurrence of stronger geomagnetic<br \/>disturbances. Their onset was mostly predicted for February 5, with<br \/>the possibility of occurring one or two days earlier. This is what<br \/>happened, with the arrival of the CME recorded on February 4 at 1421<br \/>UT and a G1 (Minor) geomagnetic disturbance developing. It is<br \/>expected to continue until February 6 or possibly February 7. At the<br \/>same time, the production of energetically significant flares could<br \/>continue in active region No. 4366 until February 7. At the same<br \/>time, there will continue a period of slightly increased probability<br \/>of the Earth being hit by proton of solar origin. A decrease in<br \/>solar and geomagnetic activity is expected in the following days.<\/p>\n<p>The Predicted Planetary A Index for February 7 to February 13 is 8,<br \/>8, 10, 8, 8, 5 and 20, with a mean of 9.5. Predicted Planetary K<br \/>Index is 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 2, and 5 with a mean of 3.1. 10.7-centimeter<br \/>flux is 125, 130, 135, 140, 135, 140, and 145, with a mean of 135.7.<\/p>\n<p>For more information concerning shortwave radio propagation, see<br \/> and the ARRL Technical Information<br \/>Service web page at,  For<br \/>an explanation of numbers used in this bulletin, see<br \/> . Information and<br \/>tutorials on propagation can be found at,  .<\/p>\n<p>Also, check this:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Rc8Njt<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<em>Understanding Solar Indices<\/em>&#8221; from September 2002 QST.<br \/>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-arrl-solar-update-19?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>02\/06\/2026 Solar activity was at high levels for most of the week, dominated byRegion 4366. The most notable event was an impulsive X4.2 flare fromthat region on February 4. Throughout&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-800566","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/800566","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=800566"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/800566\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=800566"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=800566"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=800566"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}