{"id":800690,"date":"2026-02-13T14:56:30","date_gmt":"2026-02-13T19:56:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=800690"},"modified":"2026-02-13T14:56:30","modified_gmt":"2026-02-13T19:56:30","slug":"the-arrl-solar-update-19","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/?p=800690","title":{"rendered":"The ARRL Solar Update"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<span class=\"date\">02\/13\/2026<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Solar activity reached moderate levels early this week. The<br \/>strongest event was an M1.4 flare observed on February 11 in Region<br \/>4366. This region also produced nine C-class flares.<br \/>\u00a0<br \/>Region 4373 produced a C1.8\/Sf flare on February 11. This region<br \/>displayed some minor area growth. Regions 4369 and 4371 exhibited<br \/>some minor decay. The other spotted regions remained unchanged. New<br \/>Region 4375 was numbered. A small loop structure near S22W80 erupted<br \/>around February 10.<br \/>\u00a0<br \/>Around the same time, a large filament (located near N15W25) lifted<br \/>off and disappeared from GONG H-alpha imagery. Between faint<br \/>features in disk imagery and a data gap in STEREO coronagraph<br \/>imagery, it is difficult to determine whether the filament is<br \/>superimposed over the earlier eruption or largely fell back down to<br \/>the Sun. Analysis of the coronagraph structure indicates there is no<br \/>Earth-directed component. However, there is the potential for<br \/>interaction between the eruption and the co-rotating interaction<br \/>region (CIR) ahead of an anticipated high-speed stream, which may<br \/>cause the CIR to become compressed and arrive later than under<br \/>ambient conditions.<br \/>\u00a0<br \/>Solar activity is expected to be at low levels through February 14.<br \/>Probability for M-class (R1-R2) flares dropped to a slight chance on<br \/>February 14, with a slight chance for X-class (R3 or greater) flares<br \/>on February 12 as Region 4366 continues to rotate behind the western<br \/>limb.<br \/>\u00a0 <br \/>Solar wind parameters continued to reflect waning influence of a<br \/>negative polarity coronal hole high-speed stream (CH HSS) with<br \/>discrete mild disturbances likely associated with embedded transient<br \/>structures. Solar wind speeds remained generally elevated, slowly<br \/>decreasing from approximately 500 km\/s to 400 km\/s by the end of the<br \/>reporting period.<br \/>\u00a0<br \/>On February 14, the wind environment is expected to become more<br \/>enhanced late in the day due to CIR effects from a large positive<br \/>polarity coronal hole high speed stream (CH HSS) coupled with<br \/>possible weak CME effects from the February 11 eruption.<\/p>\n<p>Weekly Commentary on the Sun, the Magnetosphere, and the Earth&#8217;s<br \/>Ionosphere, February 12, 2026, by F. K. Janda, OK1HH:<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The last largest sunspot group, also known as NOAA active region<br \/>4366, which suddenly appeared in the southeast of the solar disk on<br \/>January 30, has now disappeared. Until then, it was the source of a<br \/>long series of energetically significant flares. (This group could<br \/>reappear on the eastern limb of solar disk around February 23.)<br \/>Overall solar activity declined, slowly at first, and more<br \/>significantly after the setting of AR 4366.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The geomagnetic field was mostly quiet to unsettled, with the<br \/>exception of a disturbance on February 5 and calm days on February<br \/>8-9. Due to the absence of major and longer geomagnetic disturbances<br \/>and despite the decline in solar radiation, ionospheric propagation<br \/>conditions for short waves were mostly slightly above average.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A slight increase in solar activity can be expected from<br \/>mid-February, meanwhile it appears that geomagnetic activity could<br \/>also increase slightly at around the same time. Until then,<br \/>ionospheric propagation conditions for short waves are likely to<br \/>remain slightly above average.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;It is not yet possible to predict whether the minor disturbances<br \/>from January 16 to 17 and, in particular, the more significant<br \/>disturbances around January 20 will recur (in the latter case, this<br \/>would be around February 16, when geomagnetic activity is likely to<br \/>increase, but probably only to an &#8216;active&#8217; level).&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The latest solar report from Dr. Tamitha Skov, WX6SWW, can be found<br \/>on YouTube at,  .<\/p>\n<p>Predicted Planetary A Index for February 14 to 20 is 5, 5, 15, 15,<br \/>15, 15, and 15, with a mean of 12.1.\u00a0 Predicated Planetary K Index<br \/>is 2, 2, 4, 4, 4, 4, and 4, with a mean of 3.4.\u00a0 10.7-centimeter<br \/>flux is 140, 150, 160, 170, 180, 175, and 170, with a mean of 163.6.<\/p>\n<p>For more information concerning shortwave radio propagation, see<br \/> and the ARRL Technical Information<br \/>Service web page at,  For<br \/>an explanation of numbers used in this bulletin, see<br \/> . Information and<br \/>tutorials on propagation can be found at,  .<\/p>\n<p>Also, check this:<\/p>\n<p>https:\/\/bit.ly\/3Rc8Njt<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;<em>Understanding Solar Indices<\/em>&#8221; from September 2002 <em>QST<\/em>.<br \/>NNNN<br \/>\/EX<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"http:\/\/www.arrl.org\/news\/view\/the-arrl-solar-update-20?rand=771671\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>02\/13\/2026 Solar activity reached moderate levels early this week. Thestrongest event was an M1.4 flare observed on February 11 in Region4366. This region also produced nine C-class flares.\u00a0Region 4373 produced&hellip; <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":771673,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-800690","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-ARRL"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/800690","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=800690"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/800690\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/771673"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=800690"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=800690"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/spaceweekly.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=800690"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}