\n Illustration of the exoplanet K2-18b<\/p>\n NASA<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/p>\n The planet K2-18b, which drew intense speculation last year due to apparent signs of life, shows no signs of advanced civilisation after a comprehensive search for radio signals from it.<\/p>\n In 2025, Nikku Madhusudhan at the University of Cambridge and his colleagues sensationally claimed that K2-18b, an apparent water world 124 light years away, showed hints in its atmosphere of the molecule dimethyl sulphide (DMS). Significant quantities of this molecule on Earth are produced only by life, so Madhusudhan and his team argued that the signals suggest we may be seeing signs of life from K2-18b, too.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n However, subsequent observations and more rigorous analyses showed that the evidence for DMS could instead have come from other molecules not associated with life. Scientists concluded that the most we could say about the planet is that it is rich in water, either in the form of an ocean or a water-rich atmosphere.<\/p>\n Now, Madhusudhan and other researchers have looked for whether K2-18b might show signs of intelligent life in the form of radio signals blasted out to space, like the signals humans have been transmitting since the 1960s.<\/p>\n They observed K2-18b for several orbits around its star, using the Very Large Array telescope in New Mexico and the MeerKAT radio telescope in South Africa, looking for radio signals in similar frequencies to those emitted on Earth. The search would have picked up any signals from transmitters similar in strength to Arecibo, the now-defunct radio telescope in Puerto Rico.<\/p>\n But after filtering out potential sources of terrestrial interference, they found no signal to suggest that K2-18b had powerful radio transmitters. The researchers declined to speak with New Scientist<\/em> about their work.<\/p>\n \u201cIf there were a continuously transmitting, Arecibo-class beacon directed toward Earth [from K2-18b], they likely would have detected it,\u201d says Michael Garrett at the University of Manchester, UK.<\/p>\n \u201cOf course, a non-detection doesn\u2019t tell us that the system is uninhabited. It simply constrains a very specific and possibly rare class of signals: persistent, relatively narrow-band radio transmitters operating in the observed frequency range and illuminating Earth during the observing windows,\u201d says Garrett. \u201cCivilisations, if they exist, might not use radio in this way at all or might transmit intermittently, directionally or at much lower power levels. On a water world, very low-frequency radio waves might be more prevalent.\u201d<\/p>\n It may be that alien water worlds are suitable for simple life forms, but difficult environments for complex, intelligent life that can develop technology, says Garrett. \u201cWithout exposed landmasses, the pathway toward building complex infrastructure could be quite different from what we experienced on Earth.\u201d<\/p>\n Spend a weekend with some of the brightest minds in science, as you explore the mysteries of the universe in an exciting programme that includes an excursion to see the iconic Lovell Telescope.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/section>\n Topics:<\/p>\n<\/section><\/div>\n![\"Jodrell](\"https:\/\/images.newscientist.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/01\/15113200\/img_6300.jpeg\")
\n <\/picture>\nMysteries of the universe: Cheshire, England<\/h3>\n